RE: BMW M Division Wants A 1-series M

RE: BMW M Division Wants A 1-series M

Author
Discussion

stuckmojo

2,984 posts

189 months

Tuesday 17th November 2009
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
VXR-8, I guess.

RobM77

35,349 posts

235 months

Tuesday 17th November 2009
quotequote all
k-ink said:
You won't get any half decent powered German car with an affordable price. These sort of badge engineering companies are far too greedy these days. Buy a VXR if you want value for money and no BS.
If you want a nicely balanced reasonably light rear drive coupé though (e.g. Cayman) you have to just accept that sort of baggage that comes with a German car, because they're the only people making cars like that. Everyone else just tunes up shopping cars. It's a great shame, but that's the way it is.

aeropilot

34,718 posts

228 months

Tuesday 17th November 2009
quotequote all
stuckmojo said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
VXR-8, I guess.
Only if you can live with the barry-boy looks as well as the potential thirst of that Corvette lump.

Belfast Boy

855 posts

183 months

Tuesday 17th November 2009
quotequote all
the hatch its a good little drift car, the coupe I dont like so much, but I can see the appeal, M1? that was a wedge mobile from the seventies wasn't it?

SunderJimmy

3,239 posts

183 months

Tuesday 17th November 2009
quotequote all
louismchuge said:
slow news day? BMW might build a car? st the bed!
It's better than that post the other year about an existing Audi engine being put in an existing Audi body.

RobM77

35,349 posts

235 months

Tuesday 17th November 2009
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Oops - I forgot that! It stands alone these days though. We used to have all sorts of nice Jap machinery around (200SX, 300ZX, Mazda RX-7, Celica GT4). Having said that, I've driven a 350Z and wouldn't put it in the same category as the Cayman etc. I just found the steering over heavy and devoid of feel, the DBW throttle jumpy and the car just too big and heavy really. Just my opinion mind you! I know I'll be flamed for saying that. A four seater saloon can weigh 1500kg+, but a coupé?!

RobM77

35,349 posts

235 months

Tuesday 17th November 2009
quotequote all
louismchuge said:
slow news day? BMW might build a car? st the bed!
biggrin What other sort of news do we expect on Pistonheads? Besides, I think a new M car is always exciting news! smile

RobM77

35,349 posts

235 months

Tuesday 17th November 2009
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
yes probably, yes. The one I drove was a first release version - Mk1 350Z. Probably just not my sort of car - I like small communicative cars. I've got to say - very cheap interior too.. Something like an EVO VI gets away with it, but in my opinion the 1500kg 350Z is playing the long distance GT game (like the Z4 Coupé), and for that I'd want fewer rattles and flimsy plastic bits.

RacingTeatray

2,495 posts

217 months

Tuesday 17th November 2009
quotequote all
baz1985 said:
They're having a laugh, it's a sign that they are planning an X1 M, and then an X3 M.

But seriously a 1 M with a M-diff, slick manual box and proper brakes, would get me interested.
To be fair then, you're suggesting fitting a 135i with an M-Diff would do the trick?!?

Because it already has a perfectly slick manual box and highly effective 6-pot calipers....commented on in all roadtests as "BMW finally fits fast car with decent brakes".

Personally, I think if they took a 135i, sharpened up the throttle response, fitted the diff, the performance exhaust (quad might be OTT) and slightly flared the arches, they'd be pretty much there with a 1M.

The performance is already pretty epic - only the softish throttle response slightly takes the edge off.

Lil' Joe said:
R66STU said:
I think i get the idea of this car and who its aimed at..youngerish drivers that cant afford to insure/run/buy an M3..
Believe me, young drivers have no hope of insuring a 135i!
Actually the insurance is surprisingly good for a car with north of 300bhp. It's IG17 and my premiums are notably low for this sort of car. Certainly less than I paid for my old Alfa 156 GTA.

Edited by RacingTeatray on Tuesday 17th November 17:36

havoc

30,131 posts

236 months

Tuesday 17th November 2009
quotequote all
RobM77 said:
jamiesim said:
BMW please make this happen...

Make it £25k and you will sell these like hot cakes..

Light, simple and rapid!!! - M1 - LSR - sounds good to me
yes The comfort options can always be on the options list. Practical driver's cars are very thin on the ground. The Integra Type R and Lotus Elise are the only two I can think of, but the Elise isn't as practical as the Integra. I don't like FWD, so ended up with an Elise and then bought a BMW for motorways. A rear drive ITR style car would be amazing as it would cover both bases. Would it sell though?
yes

My ideal car would have characteristics from the ITR, the E46 M3, and probably some NSX in there too...

...and it's about as likely to happen as me winning the lottery (at which point I'd bloody-well MAKE it! biggrin )

baz1985

3,598 posts

246 months

Tuesday 17th November 2009
quotequote all
Racingteatray

^^^^

That is a pertinent assessment.

If I had the capital to spunk, I'd be inclined to add BMW Performance engine tuning kit, silencer system and air intake system. ACS Shortshift/Racing Strut-Brace, KW V3, H&R ARBs, transplant an E46 M3 diff is possible...and Mich PS2 non-run sh!t tyres.

Edited by baz1985 on Tuesday 17th November 17:54


Edited by baz1985 on Tuesday 17th November 18:03

havoc

30,131 posts

236 months

Tuesday 17th November 2009
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
clap

Unfortunately, people like us seem to be in a minority - ALL manufacturers seem to be in either a horsepower war or an emissions war!

Marquis_Rex

7,377 posts

240 months

Tuesday 17th November 2009
quotequote all
It's ugly, and heavy and small.

I'm far happier with my E21 with E36 'M' subframes and brakes and steering rack, Z3 M rear suspension subframes and a carbon fibre front bonnet covering a high revving 3.1 M20.

All in a car that weighs about 1080 Kg (when I'e finished with it).



Edited by Marquis_Rex on Tuesday 17th November 18:37

3ftandclean

357 posts

181 months

Tuesday 17th November 2009
quotequote all
I have a 135i and love it. It's that bit smaller than a 3 series which makes it more nimble and quicker around town, it's just more fun. However, having had E46 M3's in the past I think the 135i could do with being a bit more focused in that direction. An M version with about 330bhp and the same lbs/ft would be just about right I reckon and if they could lighten it up a bit and maybe address the 'challenging' looks I'd be very keen on one indeed.

RobM77

35,349 posts

235 months

Tuesday 17th November 2009
quotequote all
3ftandclean said:
I have a 135i and love it. It's that bit smaller than a 3 series which makes it more nimble and quicker around town, it's just more fun. However, having had E46 M3's in the past I think the 135i could do with being a bit more focused in that direction. An M version with about 330bhp and the same lbs/ft would be just about right I reckon and if they could lighten it up a bit and maybe address the 'challenging' looks I'd be very keen on one indeed.
And remove the throttle delay! That's the single reason why I went for the Z4C instead of the 135i for my practical everyday car.

andyjbrady

7 posts

175 months

Tuesday 17th November 2009
quotequote all
The 135i that was on display at the Pistonheads meet at BMW Bracknell a couple of Sundays ago had what looked like every BMW Performance option and the retail price was ~£48k! Up from what? £32k new. I think that has 330bhp ish. Am not sure how far Evo will go along that line.

aeropilot

34,718 posts

228 months

Tuesday 17th November 2009
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
There's no reason why it can't be pretty good, it's just a matter of getting it right. I've driven a few turbo cars in their sport mode that have acceptably good throttle response.

anonymous said:
[redacted]
Yes. I was intending to get a 130i but that got canned when BMW dropped it for the UK market.

A ///M version of the N52 would be nice, 300hp should be doable with a few tweeks and a serious TB setup for a lovely induction noise and with a nice exhaust, and.....oh wait a minute, that wouldn't be allowed under EU noise and emissions nanny state rules.....

So, sadly, the days of that sort of tuned n/a engine are over, and people will just have to get used to that.


Mr Whippy

29,082 posts

242 months

Tuesday 17th November 2009
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
270bhp is ample anyway with a decent weight car, and being valvetronic can't have tb's or hotter cams per se. As an engine in the z4 it seems to sound ace too, better than the 3.0i m54 IMHO.

It is as M as an engine needs to be, cheaper than s62, lighter, fits all euro bullste, drives better than most other stuff and is a lovely na motor. Just shy on power, BUT, we already agree that isn't so important anyway!

Would have been the 1 coupe I'd have bought, but 2.5 isn't enough IMHO, and the turbo misses the point somewhat for me. Like an n52 3.0 is shy on torque or power already for sub 1400kg. Gah BMW are just stoopid!

aeropilot

34,718 posts

228 months

Wednesday 18th November 2009
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Low run production exemptions.


Mr Whippy

29,082 posts

242 months

Wednesday 18th November 2009
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
The N52 is still preferable, to me, and meets all the silly regs, than a 2.5 turbo piece of crap.

OK, it'll probably make good numbers, and drive ok for what it's worth, but driving an emotive car is about more than paper stats. It's about the way it makes you feel!

I'd rather go buy an older car, and when the M1 is old, I'll just buy an older better car instead.

Encouraging mediocrity by buying this sort of stuff from BMW M is not a good idea imho. M is starting to just mean the most powerful and heavy car in the range, oh, and the most expensive. Down the pan goes the heritage of a quality drivers product!