RE: Ruf Unveils Electric Cayenne

RE: Ruf Unveils Electric Cayenne

Author
Discussion

SR06

749 posts

187 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
We all love the IC engine, but let's face it something has to change. This may not be the alternative but its always going to be a 'work in progress'. I personally can't wait for diesel killing linear torque to hit the showrooms. Batteries will get lighter. However it still isn't the solution.


soad

32,903 posts

177 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
Not exactly practical at the moment, is it? Might be okay for town use.

I do see electric TNT trucks on a daily basis almost.

Agent Orange

2,194 posts

247 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
125 mile range. Ok for a little city car but an SUV? Then again most SUVs spend their time between the house, school and gym so maybe enough.

UncappedTag

2,102 posts

186 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
Says it all in the name 'Ruf'

f111lover

143 posts

194 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
Electric cars are getting there, just need to lose some weight.
(3.5 fat people = 315Kg, there spake an anorexic tt).

Motorrad

6,811 posts

188 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
Not what RuF should be about.

TheRoadWarrior

1,241 posts

179 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
FAIL.

him_over_there

970 posts

207 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
I like it.

I think it looks great in green.


forzaminardi

2,290 posts

188 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
My God, it might save the world but it'll kill anyone unlucky enough to see one in the flesh.

pilchardthecat

7,483 posts

180 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
I think it looks ok.

It's the half a tonne of heavy metals in those batteries, and the zillions of tonnes of coal that will be incinerated to make electricity to move the lardy-arsed lump down the road that bothers me.

kambites

67,580 posts

222 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
Who has given this a high enough PH rating to gets its average to over 3?!?

Johnpidge

588 posts

190 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
Agent Orange said:
125 mile range. Ok for a little city car but an SUV? Then again most SUVs spend their time between the house, school and gym so maybe enough.
Spot on........... pointless except for green yuppies - not for the real world! Oh and all the electricity comes from burning fosil fuels in the uk pretty much and don't even mention the lithium batteries!?!?!?!

Dibby

423 posts

201 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
I wonder about these rechargeable systems - you buy a new cordless drill and it's brilliant, plenty of torque and lasts for ever. 2 years later and it hardly holds enough charge to do up 2 screws in a Mecchano set. The same happens with mobile phones, new ones last for weeks, old ones need charging every day.

Seems as cars will easily last 20+ years and 300k+ miles if you look after them, will be seeing G Whizzes hitting the scrap heaps in huge numbers in a couple of years time because the batteries are nackered? I'm getting the feeling electric cars are becoming disposable items filled with some pretty nasty chemicals you can't just dump ... or have they sorted the problem of degrading battery performance yet?

... but then I suppose G Whizz drivers are London'ites who think a car over 3 years old is past it rather than only just broken in and starting to loosen up.

CooperD

2,870 posts

178 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
What a hideous monstrosity. Quite possibly the ugliest car since the Ford Scorpio.

kambites

67,580 posts

222 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
I think these cars will have very carefully managed recharge cycles which will extend the battery life well beyond a relatively simple device like a phone. I'd be surprised if they can't maintain 80% of their charge after ten years of use.

kma

959 posts

195 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
I'm probably on my own here but i actually think some cayennes look good, that however, is one ugly POS!

As for the electricness, well at the moment i think they pretty much all suck, but they wont get better if they don't keep making them.

Nickellarse

533 posts

190 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
I really think that bio diesel is the way forward in terms of sustainable transport.




Dibby

423 posts

201 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
^^ I'd disagree. I've said for years there is no such thing as sustainable with this many people on the earth. Finally good to see Attenborough making the first sensible stab (apart from the Chinese and the one child policy) at highlighting the problem. The answer isn't hybrids, biodiesel, remewables, carbon footprints. There's simply too many of us, all the other animals on the planet naturally regulate their numbers apart from the humans, we keep thinking ways round our problems and we keep on breeding like rabbits


kambites said:
I think these cars will have very carefully managed recharge cycles which will extend the battery life well beyond a relatively simple device like a phone. I'd be surprised if they can't maintain 80% of their charge after ten years of use.
We'll see in 10-20 years time years but I don't imagine there will be a thriving classic car market of them ... or it will be a static display at least

I'm sure they've managed it better than phones that only last a year or so but I'd take manufacturer's bumph of 80% capacity after 10 years with a huge sack of salt. They know full well you won't go back and hold them to it so they'll claim whatever they like

Edited by Dibby on Thursday 10th December 16:09

E21_Ross

35,093 posts

213 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
that is hideous, it's got the 5 series GT pushed for bad looker on that one i reckon!

kambites

67,580 posts

222 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
Dibby said:
^^ I'd disagree. I've said for years there is no such thing as sustainable with this many people on the earth. Finally good to see Attenborough making the first sensible stab (apart from the Chinese and the one child policy) at highlighting the problem. The answer isn't hybrids, biodiesel, remewables, carbon footprints. There's simply too many of us, all the other animals on the planet naturally regulate their numbers apart from the humans, we keep thinking ways round our problems and we keep on breeding like rabbits


kambites said:
I think these cars will have very carefully managed recharge cycles which will extend the battery life well beyond a relatively simple device like a phone. I'd be surprised if they can't maintain 80% of their charge after ten years of use.
We'll see in 10-20 years time years but I don't imagine there will be a thriving classic car market of them ... or it will be a static display at least

I'm sure they've managed it better than phones that only last a year or so but I'd take manufacturer's bumph of 80% capacity after 10 years with a huge sack of salt. They know full well you won't go back and hold them to it so they'll claim whatever they like
I'm 100% certain that people said the same of the reliability of the internal combustion engine 100 years ago.