RE: Exclusive: Detailed Pics Of 1000hp Venom GT
Discussion
teen_cerbera said:
Jaykaybi said:
Sod internet b
hing and handbag swinging, JH hasn't done you any harm and all these threads are about something from 2001. The facts is the facts and that Venom GT looks like an absolute f*cking riot and I want one. Please.
Ohh thats ok then, as long as he only conned dozens of people for hundreds of thousands of dollars before 2001. hing and handbag swinging, JH hasn't done you any harm and all these threads are about something from 2001. The facts is the facts and that Venom GT looks like an absolute f*cking riot and I want one. Please.
Each to their own, but I would not sign a Cheque for what? £500k+ made out to a guy who has conned tens, if not hundreds of people out of hundreds of thousands of dollars, the attitude of "He hasnt done me any harm" is total non sense? I mean if a business has a bad reputation, you stay clear, even if you have never dealt with them before...
Not you is it JH? Wouldnt be the first time hes done this undercover self defence thing in a public forum
OT: Would love too see this going round a tight track i.e. Top Gear Track.
Super Rare 1000bhp unproven supercar? Ill take one of these:
Yes, I understand the importance of a good reputation.
No, I still don't care if you think my view that 'that is an awesome car and I am 100% taking it on merit alone because if I met it with some keys and a tank of fuel it would be more fun than licking yoghurt off the Olsen twins' is invalid because of the person behind it. For smeg's sake, Axl Rose is an astonishing tool but it doesn't stop me loving Appetite for Destruction.
P.S. And I love the Zenvo too, but as I don't know if Mr Zenvo is a saint I'll refrain from saying so, just in case.
Progressless decadent difference without significant meaningful improvement. Once, cars stayed the same until an advancement of the machine became available. Look at the massive changes that occurred from the early 70s into the late eighties among any new car model, but particularly the s-class. Now do the same analysis from early 90s to today. Over the last twenty years, the ultimate in does-everything conveyances has never stood still, but it's fairly difficult to say that the newest car really advances the talents of the s-class in any way except standing start acceleration. I'm sure someone could point out that 26-point something is far better than the nowhere near 20 mpg of the early 90s s600 or whaTever model you'd care to name, but that's not really all that compelling in the context of a $100k sedan, now is it. Think of the dignity of the Morgan shape or the air-cooled 911s, or the esprit or any other car that skilled out on superficial changes to the parts of the car that always worked while the guts underneath merely kept up with the times by modest advancement. Mercedes has so contorted its models in meaningless ways that it makes you wonder whether resale value would have been higher if the latest motors and tech were strapped under the early 90s bank vault body. Why sell out your clientele's value so much when your cars trade on being a reliably understood set of qualities. It's just a cash grab. By comparison, look at the boxster and nsx. The s55 to s63 to this faux s'63'
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff