RE: New Lease Of Life For Original TVR Tuscan

RE: New Lease Of Life For Original TVR Tuscan

Author
Discussion

teen_cerbera

7,921 posts

226 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
Examining the photos, and being a Photoshop buff my self, are these images not photoshopped?

The wheels look "oddly" angled, and the front bumper just doesnt seem to sit right.

TC

UncappedTag

2,102 posts

186 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
Starts off nice until they added those chrome side vents and lights that look reminicent of a mk2 Cortina and look horid.

siwebster

387 posts

194 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
jl34 said:
I saw it a race retro and it looks even better than the photos. The Bumper looks good in my opinion whn you see it in the flesh. Think there is a lot of work to turn it from a race car into a fully developed road car with the basic ergonomics we expect though.

Can you imagine the grunt of that thing ?. it weighs bugger all!
Yep, I saw it there too, was pretty impressed, got one of their little brochures somewhere. All the performance figures were untested at the time, but seem really impressive.

Looks like a lot of fun!

G4HKS

2,673 posts

220 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
madrob6 said:
That's lovely but the front bumper ruins it for me.
I totally agree.

Scoobimax

1,892 posts

202 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
Might be out on a limb here but I love the bonnet and front end - i want one for my S3!

Each to their own I suppose!

Cotty

39,642 posts

285 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
King Fisher said:
This is exactly what TVR should have done when the Rover V8 went out of production - stick in a Chevy V8.
Too right, I would be driving a T350 if that was the case.

Shabs

1,866 posts

207 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
perfect perfect perfect, one day the Lotus will get traded in for one of these cloud9

braddo

10,587 posts

189 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
Farkin' awesome. I so hope they manage to produce some.

jayfish

6,795 posts

204 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
'exciting to drive'
likes to swap ends when ethusiam>skill?

norwichphoto

986 posts

225 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
The rear lights on the original Tuscan were Cortina Mk II - the earlier Griffith had Mk I 'ban the bomb' lights.

Curiously it seems more 3000M to me than Tuscan, I recall my fathers Tuscan V8 SE had different door frames - the door window was more vertical at the back edge, hidden door hinges, and I'd prefer to see period alloys as those on the car look awkwardly out of place.

I always thought TVR were daft in creating their own engines - they should have bought in customer engines, either Ford or Chevrolet V8's or BMW / Audi engines. Ford would have historical comparisons - Dad's current Griffith has a Ford 289 Hi-Po, his Tuscan had a Ford 302 V8.

balls-out

3,618 posts

232 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
I used to own a Tuscan V6. It made most others cars look so big. same length as an MG midget, yet masses of leg and head room.
WANT!

rusty1980

291 posts

176 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
I must confess I don't like it.

Garlick

40,601 posts

241 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
rusty1980 said:
I must confess I don't like it.
redcard

Ban imminent.....

Janesy B

2,625 posts

187 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
Those rear lights look awfully like those stuck on the back of MK2 Cortinas.

MSportUK

133 posts

242 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
Fidgits said:
power to weight sounds ambitious.... but lovely if they hit it biggrin
The Tuscan race car which was at Race Retro was, I believe, about 850kg and somewhere in the region of 650bhp, so the 'heavyweight' roadgoing model should be achievable.

norwichphoto said:
Curiously it seems more 3000M to me than Tuscan, I recall my fathers Tuscan V8 SE had different door frames - the door window was more vertical at the back edge, hidden door hinges, and I'd prefer to see period alloys as those on the car look awkwardly out of place.
Based on the widebody LWB jobby...


I think fitting huge brakes to keep all the ponies in check would preclude the use of smaller wheels.

Furyblade_Lee

4,108 posts

225 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
If I was in the market for a £50k sportscar and that drove with a least a smidgin of refinement, that would be on my driveway. Proper old-skool-kool.

GingerNinja

3,961 posts

259 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
jellison is rebuilding a racing one of these - for authenticity, he's using a heavy Ford V8 with a heavy diff and box and is aiming for 950Kg and over 500bhp in race trim.

As the Chevy combo will be much lighter, in elementary road trim, their weights seem achievable - fat tyres too.

Mental.

Johnpidge

588 posts

190 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
980kg - 480BHP woohoowoohoo

GTRene

16,668 posts

225 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
love it! very cool/fast
classic looks and modern tech.

I also love the Griffith 200 with the funny rear, and the Griffith 400 with the nice cortina's
would love to see those back as a replica but then better build and also a LS3<>LS7 engine option.
and ofcorse a nice interior with some nice lightweight race seats.

Mannginger

9,094 posts

258 months

Friday 16th April 2010
quotequote all
Delightful looking car!

cloud9