RE: Officially official: BMW 1-series M for 2011

RE: Officially official: BMW 1-series M for 2011

Author
Discussion

havoc

30,073 posts

235 months

Saturday 5th June 2010
quotequote all
NoelWatson said:
havoc said:
Captain Flashman said:
its funny, i love the idea of the R26.R but i could never spend my money on a front drive car, i have the same problem with the mini. the exige is my lotus of choice, a car i actually want but i don't really fit into it.
yes

When looking at that sort of money...well, you can see what I went for, gambling on repair-bills vs depreciation. Ironically the R26.R is probably as quick/quicker point-to-point than my NSX in the hands of anyone except a very skilled driver...but IMHO speed isn't the be-all and end-all of driving.
I think you could have just as much fun in R26.R as in NSX
yes

Which is why I've still got the 'teg - very different cars but both really good fun, albeit in different ways...and I didn't have to pay £20k+ for the 'teg...

haidergill

16 posts

166 months

Saturday 5th June 2010
quotequote all
the-photographer said:
haidergill said:
the-photographer said:
OK, you're lucky it's a quiet afternoon at work...

Audi TTRS 1450 + 75 = 1525 / 335bhp (manual)

Cayman S 1425 kg / 295bhp (manual)

370z 1496 + 75 = 1571 kg / 331bhp (manual)

BMW 135i 1530 kg / 302bhp (manual)

BMW Z4 sDrive35is 1600 kg / 340bhp (7-speed DSG)

Ariel Atom 456 + 75 = 531 kg / 245-300 bhp (manual)

Audi S3 1515 + 75 = 1590 / 261bhp (auto)

BMW 1-M ???? / ???

Should we add any others?


Car Weight KG (inc driver)
Atom 531
Cayman S 1425
Audi TTRS 1525
BMW 135i 1530
370z 1571
S3 1590
BMW Z4 sDrive35is 1600


Note, it's very hard to calculate accurate weights and even harder to compare car to car. For example, looking at the 370z brochure, the optional 19" wheels add another 29kg
what about the Ariel Atom???
Getting a bit silly, but I've added it. To counter this, I've added the S3 5 door sportback after all comments about space!
Caparo T1 689KG kerb weight. 575BHP.

the-photographer

3,486 posts

176 months

Sunday 6th June 2010
quotequote all
Updated, with a couple more favourites

Audi TTRS 1450 + 75 = 1525 / 335bhp (manual)

Cayman S 1425 kg / 295bhp (manual)

370z 1496 + 75 = 1571 kg / 323bhp (manual)

BMW 135i 1530 kg / 302bhp (manual)

BMW Z4 sDrive35is 1600 kg / 340bhp (7-speed DSG)

BWM 335i M Sport 1600kg / 306bhp (manual)

M3 Coupe 1655kg / 420bhp (manual)

Ariel Atom 456 + 75 = 531 kg / 245-300 bhp (manual)

Audi S3 1515 + 75 = 1590 / 261bhp (auto)

Caparo T1 689kg / 575bhp (manual)

BMW 1-M ???? / ???

Should we add any others?


Car Weight KG (inc driver)
Atom 531
Caparo T1 689
Cayman S 1425
Audi TTRS 1525
BMW 135i 1530
370z 1571
S3 1590
BMW Z4 sDrive35is 1600
BMW 335i M Sport 1600
BMW M3 Coupe 1655


Edited by the-photographer on Sunday 6th June 08:35

NoelWatson

11,710 posts

242 months

Sunday 6th June 2010
quotequote all
the-photographer said:
Updated, with a couple more favourites

Audi TTRS 1450 + 75 = 1525 / 335bhp (manual)

Cayman S 1425 kg / 295bhp (manual)

370z 1496 + 75 = 1571 kg / 331bhp (manual)

BMW 135i 1530 kg / 302bhp (manual)

BMW Z4 sDrive35is 1600 kg / 340bhp (7-speed DSG)

BWM 335i M Sport 1600kg / 306bhp (manual)

M3 Coupe 1655kg / 420bhp (manual)

Ariel Atom 456 + 75 = 531 kg / 245-300 bhp (manual)

Audi S3 1515 + 75 = 1590 / 261bhp (auto)

Caparo T1 689kg / 575bhp (manual)

BMW 1-M ???? / ???

Should we add any others?


Car Weight KG (inc driver)
Atom 531
Caparo T1 689
Cayman S 1425
Audi TTRS 1525
BMW 135i 1530
370z 1571
S3 1590
BMW Z4 sDrive35is 1600
BMW 335i M Sport 1600
BMW M3 Coupe 1655
I thought 370z is 324bhp?

http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/news/default.asp?stor...

the-photographer

3,486 posts

176 months

Sunday 6th June 2010
quotequote all
NoelWatson said:
Amended using the brochure figure, to 323

nobodyknows

12,044 posts

169 months

Sunday 6th June 2010
quotequote all
NoelWatson said:
the-photographer said:
NoelWatson said:
the-photographer said:
teamHOLDENracing said:
Are all these weights on the same basis? BMW's published weights normally includes driver & luggage (85kg) and a 90% full fuel tank....
Yes, I looked at brochures and added 75kg where appropriate. I'm happy for you to double check.
I'm not convinced the brochures are that accurate.
OK, I think they have to be reasonably accurate because of EU directive 95/48
I recall several Autocar road tests where the car is >100kg more than claimed. I would like to see a Cayman on a weighbridge, as unofficially I hear it is closer to 1500kg
didn't EVO magazine start weighing cars & rolling roading them to check manufacturers claims when they tested them, don't seem to do it any longer though?

JEMYD

23 posts

201 months

Sunday 6th June 2010
quotequote all
Yep defo has to be a coupe only ..We must be due the 2 serious soon..

haidergill

16 posts

166 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
the-photographer said:
Updated, with a couple more favourites

Audi TTRS 1450 + 75 = 1525 / 335bhp (manual)

Cayman S 1425 kg / 295bhp (manual)

370z 1496 + 75 = 1571 kg / 323bhp (manual)

BMW 135i 1530 kg / 302bhp (manual)

BMW Z4 sDrive35is 1600 kg / 340bhp (7-speed DSG)

BWM 335i M Sport 1600kg / 306bhp (manual)

M3 Coupe 1655kg / 420bhp (manual)

Ariel Atom 456 + 75 = 531 kg / 245-300 bhp (manual)

Audi S3 1515 + 75 = 1590 / 261bhp (auto)

Caparo T1 689kg / 575bhp (manual)

BMW 1-M ???? / ???

Should we add any others?


Car Weight KG (inc driver)
Atom 531
Caparo T1 689
Cayman S 1425
Audi TTRS 1525
BMW 135i 1530
370z 1571
S3 1590
BMW Z4 sDrive35is 1600
BMW 335i M Sport 1600
BMW M3 Coupe 1655


Edited by the-photographer on Sunday 6th June 08:35
Thanks mate. Your table goes to show the progression from a sports car e.g. Atom/T1 to comfy sports cars e.g. Cayman to sporty cars 335i. We should chcuk in an Lotus Exige somewhere as bridge between the two camps.

the-photographer

3,486 posts

176 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Audi TTRS 1450 + 75 = 1525 / 335bhp (manual)

Cayman S 1425 kg / 295bhp (manual)

370z 1496 + 75 = 1571 kg / 323bhp (manual)

BMW 135i 1530 kg / 302bhp (manual)

BMW Z4 sDrive35is 1600 kg / 340bhp (7-speed DSG)

BWM 335i M Sport 1600kg / 306bhp (manual)

M3 Coupe 1655kg / 420bhp (manual)

Ariel Atom 456 + 75 = 531 kg / 245-300 bhp (manual)

Audi S3 1515 + 75 = 1590 / 261bhp (auto)

Caparo T1 689kg / 575bhp (manual)

Lotus Exige S 935 + 75 = 1010kg / 220bhp (manual & ac marked as an option)

Mercedes Benz SLK 350 1505kg / 305hp (auto 7 tronic

Mercedes Benz SLK 55AMG 1575kg / 360hp (auto 7 tronic)

BMW 1-M ???? / ???

Should we add any others?


Car Weight KG (inc driver)
Atom 531
Caparo T1 689
Lotus Exige S 1010
Cayman S 1425
SLK 350 1505
Audi TTRS 1525
BMW 135i 1530
370z 1571
SLK 55AMG 1575
S3 1590
BMW Z4 sDrive35is 1600
BMW 335i M Sport 1600
BMW M3 Coupe 1655



Done, plus a couple of entries from Mercedes Benz, the AMG is pretty good considering the Z4 sDrive35is with auto box is 1600kg.

Edited by the-photographer on Monday 7th June 19:24


Edited by the-photographer on Monday 7th June 19:27

Wolands Advocate

2,495 posts

216 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Not when you consider how small an SLK is!

geoffracing

617 posts

175 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
ooral said:
kambites said:
havoc said:
kambites said:
God, is the 370Z really that heavy? eek
yes

How the hell they've managed to make 2-seat coupes weigh as much as an E46 M3 (or an E34 M5!!!) is beyond me, but both Nissan and BMW have managed it, and without a V8 in sight...
BMW don't currently have a 2 seater coupe in their line-up do they? Or am I forgetting something?
Does the new Z4 count, obv when the roof is up!smile

Edited by ooral on Saturday 5th June 02:03
I have a new Z4, and it has been raining each time I got it out!
Well, it is incredibly rigid, and it really feels like a coupé when closed.
In fact, esthetically, I prefer it closed; I consider it as a coupé you can open when it's nice weather!
I participated in a rally this weekend, and it was delightful!

RobM77

35,349 posts

234 months

Tuesday 15th June 2010
quotequote all
geoffracing said:
ooral said:
kambites said:
havoc said:
kambites said:
God, is the 370Z really that heavy? eek
yes

How the hell they've managed to make 2-seat coupes weigh as much as an E46 M3 (or an E34 M5!!!) is beyond me, but both Nissan and BMW have managed it, and without a V8 in sight...
BMW don't currently have a 2 seater coupe in their line-up do they? Or am I forgetting something?
Does the new Z4 count, obv when the roof is up!smile

Edited by ooral on Saturday 5th June 02:03
I have a new Z4, and it has been raining each time I got it out!
Well, it is incredibly rigid, and it really feels like a coupé when closed.
In fact, esthetically, I prefer it closed; I consider it as a coupé you can open when it's nice weather!
I participated in a rally this weekend, and it was delightful!
Until you consider that the outgoing Z4 Coupé was 1380kg, which is 220kg lighter than the quoted weight above for the new Z4 3.0. Some of that is the roof, and some is the increased size. I'm sure the new Z4 is a great car, and I don't mean to criticise it, but I view it as more of a Merc SL competitor than an SLK (both of which are great cars). It's not a sports car anymore - not at 1600kg when the Cayman and Evora weigh 1350kg.

RobM77

35,349 posts

234 months

Tuesday 15th June 2010
quotequote all
Wolands Advocate said:
Not when you consider how small an SLK is!
Or how big the new Z4 is... As I've said above, the new Z4 is more of an SL type car.

I'm guessing new crash test regs are to blame, with the SLK being a 2004 car and the new Z4 being much newer. After all, it's crazy to think that the SLK55 AMG has a 5.5 V8, doesn't give anything away in terms of comfort or equipment (in fact it has more of both), and is lighter than a BMW Z4 with a 3.0 litre straight 6, which incidentally is the successor to one of the lightest 6 cylinder engines in the world, the BMW 3.0 N52.

ZesPak

24,430 posts

196 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
RobM77 said:
Wolands Advocate said:
Not when you consider how small an SLK is!
Or how big the new Z4 is... As I've said above, the new Z4 is more of an SL type car.

I'm guessing new crash test regs are to blame, with the SLK being a 2004 car and the new Z4 being much newer. After all, it's crazy to think that the SLK55 AMG has a 5.5 V8, doesn't give anything away in terms of comfort or equipment (in fact it has more of both), and is lighter than a BMW Z4 with a 3.0 litre straight 6, which incidentally is the successor to one of the lightest 6 cylinder engines in the world, the BMW 3.0 N52.
could it be a design problem tough? Designing such as a small car to look good is a lot hard (imho) than when you have a lot of room to play with.

RobM77

35,349 posts

234 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
ZesPak said:
RobM77 said:
Wolands Advocate said:
Not when you consider how small an SLK is!
Or how big the new Z4 is... As I've said above, the new Z4 is more of an SL type car.

I'm guessing new crash test regs are to blame, with the SLK being a 2004 car and the new Z4 being much newer. After all, it's crazy to think that the SLK55 AMG has a 5.5 V8, doesn't give anything away in terms of comfort or equipment (in fact it has more of both), and is lighter than a BMW Z4 with a 3.0 litre straight 6, which incidentally is the successor to one of the lightest 6 cylinder engines in the world, the BMW 3.0 N52.
could it be a design problem tough? Designing such as a small car to look good is a lot hard (imho) than when you have a lot of room to play with.
Possibly, but I hope that design doesn't play such a big part in such a complicated engineering creation! The old Z4 is a bit cramped for taller occupants, which explains the size increase. Personally, at only 5'10", I love having a car that fits me, rather than a heavier one that's two sizes too big smile

Mr Whippy

29,042 posts

241 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
RobM77 said:
Wolands Advocate said:
Not when you consider how small an SLK is!
Or how big the new Z4 is... As I've said above, the new Z4 is more of an SL type car.

I'm guessing new crash test regs are to blame, with the SLK being a 2004 car and the new Z4 being much newer. After all, it's crazy to think that the SLK55 AMG has a 5.5 V8, doesn't give anything away in terms of comfort or equipment (in fact it has more of both), and is lighter than a BMW Z4 with a 3.0 litre straight 6, which incidentally is the successor to one of the lightest 6 cylinder engines in the world, the BMW 3.0 N52.
What are these crash test regs?

I keep hearing about them, but do they really inhibit producers that much? BMW are wanting to release a new Z2 anyway, so it's not that a car HAS to be so big or it's not allowed anymore.

BMW just wanted more luxury for the Z4, so a metal roof, which took up so much room they had to make the car bigger to give it a decent ish sized boot, and then it weighs more, so bigger brakes, needs more power, so more engine, and around in circles you go!

They *could* have made it the same size and just refreshed the looks, but that doesn't seem to be 'progress' these days... things have to get bigger for people to see a need to upgrade. Stupid but it seems to work for plenty of stupids. By the next generation Z4 owners will be driving around in what is essentially the 6 series convertible, while the new Z2 is actually what they used to own hehe

Same goes with all cars these days. Cars don't get replaced, they get 'upgraded'

New Astra is old Vectra, new Focus is old Mondeo kinda thing...

Dave

RobM77

35,349 posts

234 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
Mr Whippy said:
RobM77 said:
Wolands Advocate said:
Not when you consider how small an SLK is!
Or how big the new Z4 is... As I've said above, the new Z4 is more of an SL type car.

I'm guessing new crash test regs are to blame, with the SLK being a 2004 car and the new Z4 being much newer. After all, it's crazy to think that the SLK55 AMG has a 5.5 V8, doesn't give anything away in terms of comfort or equipment (in fact it has more of both), and is lighter than a BMW Z4 with a 3.0 litre straight 6, which incidentally is the successor to one of the lightest 6 cylinder engines in the world, the BMW 3.0 N52.
What are these crash test regs?

I keep hearing about them, but do they really inhibit producers that much? BMW are wanting to release a new Z2 anyway, so it's not that a car HAS to be so big or it's not allowed anymore.

BMW just wanted more luxury for the Z4, so a metal roof, which took up so much room they had to make the car bigger to give it a decent ish sized boot, and then it weighs more, so bigger brakes, needs more power, so more engine, and around in circles you go!

They *could* have made it the same size and just refreshed the looks, but that doesn't seem to be 'progress' these days... things have to get bigger for people to see a need to upgrade. Stupid but it seems to work for plenty of stupids. By the next generation Z4 owners will be driving around in what is essentially the 6 series convertible, while the new Z2 is actually what they used to own hehe

Same goes with all cars these days. Cars don't get replaced, they get 'upgraded'

New Astra is old Vectra, new Focus is old Mondeo kinda thing...

Dave
I know crash test regs are getting tougher all the time, although you're probably right, the big developments lately have been pedestrian impact, which mainly affects styling I think.

I've always been amused how the Golf used to be VW's small car; they then moved it upmarket and introduced the Polo. Then they moved both upmarket and introduced the Lupo. Then they moved all three upmarket and introduced the Fox.

In 2020 we're probably going to have entry level cars such as the VW Mouse and a BMW -5 series hehe Meanwhile, the BMW 7 series will probably be converted for use by luxury coach companies.