Stupid things non petrolheads say....

Stupid things non petrolheads say....

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Halmyre

11,204 posts

139 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
iva cosworth said:
The Narrator on "Police Interceptors" who just said.

"This Transit is 51% overweight"

It's a Mercedes Sprinter.

Whoever wrote the script obviously not a vanfan.
Meh. 'Transit' is almost a generic, like 'Hoover' or 'Portakabin' (although Portakabin hate the use of their name as a generic).

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

233 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
I compromise and use around 80% Nitrogen to fill my tyres

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
Flibble said:
CO2 is a larger molecule than N2. However as approximately 0.04% of the air is CO2 that's not a big issue. O2 is the other main component of air (aside from N2) and it is indeed slightly smaller than N2, but the difference is fairly minor in practice.

Likewise the pressure variance difference between O2 and N2 is not worth worrying about in practical terms, the only thing that really makes a difference is how much moisture is in the tyre. Dried air or nitrogen will give a more consistent fill pressure than normal ambient air due to lower water content. Whether you can actually tell the difference on a road car I'm not sure.

As I understand it the whole nitrogen filling thing is a handy money making scheme based on the fact that F1 teams use nitrogen rather than any real difference in performance. Apparently F1 teams use it because they have compressed nitrogen anyway (for the air wrenches) so it simplifies things.
F1 use a lot of different gasses, for example, in 2007 part of the Ferrari/McLaren scandal was over the use of CO2 by Ferrari...

reason to use N2 is as said, down to eradicating H2O, as this will cause significant changes in pressure as the temps change, which for a car that's extremely sensitive to tyre pressures is somewhat fundamental.

Lot of trucking co's run N2 as it's been shown to improve tyre life on their fleets.

xRIEx

8,180 posts

148 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
Flibble said:
Apparently F1 teams use it because they have compressed nitrogen anyway (for the air wrenches) so it simplifies things.
Why do they use nitrogen for the wrenches instead of just compressed air?

forzaminardi

2,290 posts

187 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
Flibble said:
As I understand it the whole nitrogen filling thing is a handy money making scheme based on the fact that F1 teams use nitrogen rather than any real difference in performance. Apparently F1 teams use it because they have compressed nitrogen anyway (for the air wrenches) so it simplifies things.
Na, F1 teams used gasified gold because its expensive.

yellowjack

17,078 posts

166 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
Flibble said:
Apparently F1 teams use it because they have compressed nitrogen anyway (for the air wrenches) so it simplifies things.
Why do they use nitrogen for the wrenches instead of just compressed air?
Dry gas (Nitrogen) means that there is no condensation hanging around inside the tools to cause corrosion when they are out of use, packed for travel between races? I'm no expert, that's just an educated guess, BTW wink

In fire extinguishers, Nitrogen is preferred to CO2 for charging dry powder units because it's simply easier and cheaper to store and use than CO2 which, as a gas, reaches higher pressures, so needs heavier cylinders to contain it, or requires refrigeration to keep it liquified. Nitrogen is useful in it's gaseous state at lower pressures than CO2, meaning thinner cylinder walls and so there's less wasted weight in the logistics chain to supply it.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
Flibble said:
Apparently F1 teams use it because they have compressed nitrogen anyway (for the air wrenches) so it simplifies things.
Why do they use nitrogen for the wrenches instead of just compressed air?
Same reason, no moisture.

If you run air, you need a dryier

scarble

5,277 posts

157 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
Or they might just do like everyone else and add oil to the air that goes in their tools.
If their tools were going to rust from ambient moisture, wouldn't the moisture in the air outside the tool also cause it to rust?

marshalla

15,902 posts

201 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
scarble said:
Or they might just do like everyone else and add oil to the air that goes in their tools.
If their tools were going to rust from ambient moisture, wouldn't the moisture in the air outside the tool also cause it to rust?
F1 - nothing gets added unless a sponsor pays for it.

telecat

8,528 posts

241 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
Dracoro said:
GroundEffect said:
Halmyre said:
Dracoro said:
Same power surely.... But I bet it weighs a lot, the auto box sapping power etc.
That's got me wondering, do automatic transmissions still sap power the way they used to?
Not nearly as much because that's a waste of fuel (i.e. higher CO2, lower MPG). Any decently designed and calibrated auto these days will be locking up the torque converter early and operate basically the same as a manual.
On a Chevy Cruse?

Gearboxes have improved on a lot of cars, however not convinced a Chevy Cruse is particularly aheadwith the game in this respect.
Just swapped My Manual 1.8 Cruze LT. It is as advanced as the current Astra being based on the current GM Delta 2 platform. The 1.8 is a bit blunted by the gearing on the Manual but still is quite quick if you keep the revs up. Personally I liked it. It had a lot of grip and the handling was just the entertaining side of safe. The Auto is one of two GM six speeders and I would not expect it to enhance the performance, I wouldn't expect it from many though.

scarble

5,277 posts

157 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
marshalla said:
F1 - nothing gets added unless a sponsor pays for it.
How many nitrogen companies have sponsorship in F1? tongue out

marshalla

15,902 posts

201 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
scarble said:
How many nitrogen companies have sponsorship in F1? tongue out
Pirelli - and it isn't pure nitrogen.


Rovinghawk

13,300 posts

158 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
CO2 which, as a gas, reaches higher pressures, so needs heavier cylinders to contain it, or requires refrigeration to keep it liquified.
Liquified CO2? Are you sure about this?

thismonkeyhere

10,350 posts

231 months

Friday 12th September 2014
quotequote all
Hugo a Gogo said:
I compromise and use around 80% Nitrogen to fill my tyres
hehe

Me too!

Flibble

6,475 posts

181 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
Why do they use nitrogen for the wrenches instead of just compressed air?
They don't want to run compressors (which break down) so they run nitrogen from tanks. I guess they could use tanks of air, but excluding oxygen has nice safety implications (no fires) and is probably not much different in cost.

hidetheelephants

24,388 posts

193 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
Dry gas (Nitrogen) means that there is no condensation hanging around inside the tools to cause corrosion when they are out of use, packed for travel between races? I'm no expert, that's just an educated guess, BTW wink

In fire extinguishers, Nitrogen is preferred to CO2 for charging dry powder units because it's simply easier and cheaper to store and use than CO2 which, as a gas, reaches higher pressures, so needs heavier cylinders to contain it, or requires refrigeration to keep it liquified. Nitrogen is useful in it's gaseous state at lower pressures than CO2, meaning thinner cylinder walls and so there's less wasted weight in the logistics chain to supply it.
You have this back to front; CO2 can be readily stored as a liquid at room temp whereas nitrogen needs low temperatures or very heavy pressure vessels.

Rovinghawk

13,300 posts

158 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
CO2 can be readily stored as a liquid at room temp .
My understanding is that there's no such thing as liquid CO2- it goes straight from gas to solid.

xRIEx

8,180 posts

148 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
Rovinghawk said:
hidetheelephants said:
CO2 can be readily stored as a liquid at room temp .
My understanding is that there's no such thing as liquid CO2- it goes straight from gas to solid.
"Carbon dioxide has no liquid state at pressures below 5.1 standard atmospheres (520 kPa). At 1 atmosphere (near mean sea level pressure), the gas deposits directly to a solid at temperatures below -78.5 °C (-109.3 °F; 194.7 K) and the solid sublimes directly to a gas above -78.5 °C."

I did not know that, that's my new thing learned for today.

It seems to be liquid at room temperature above about 100 bar.

Blown2CV

28,822 posts

203 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
Fundamentally, someone paying through the nose for pure nitrogen in their tyres without understanding why, or even if it makes a difference, they're a dick.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Saturday 13th September 2014
quotequote all
Blown2CV said:
Fundamentally, someone paying through the nose for pure nitrogen in their tyres without understanding why, or even if it makes a difference, they're a dick.
Come again?

N2 costs bugger all, big bottles are something like £30 a pop, and you can fill a st load of tyres with one bottle.

An yes, it does make a difference.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED