RE: RUF Roadster Apes Classic 911 Targa

RE: RUF Roadster Apes Classic 911 Targa

Author
Discussion

mat205125

17,790 posts

213 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
98C4S said:
Looks shiiiite
yes

Exactly like the original Targas did.

KrissJ

202 posts

183 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
barwea said:
r7ehw said:
this is a bonination!
A what?

Urban Dictionary said:
It's when you bone two or more (usually three) of the hottest babes you know, at the same time. A few rules apply 1) You must know or have met all the babes 2) They must be hot as fk 3) A sum of money may be involved to stimulate their participation 4) Video equipment may be utilized for future benification 5) You must literally bone every babe, all at once, for it to be true bonination 6) All the babes must get with eachother too
Hahaha, brilliant. Unlike the car in the article.

zeppelin101

724 posts

192 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
wukfitz said:
wrightman90 said:
From that article "The engine have the V at an angle of 180 degrees".

Correct me if i'm wrong, but thats not a V...

C
There are two forms of horizontally opposed engines, the "proper" one where corresponding pistons are at TDC at the same time, or 180* Vs where corresponding pistons share the same crank pin and don't reach TDC at the same time.

I presume this is the latter.


geoffracing

617 posts

175 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
wukfitz said:
wrightman90 said:
From that article "The engine have the V at an angle of 180 degrees".

Correct me if i'm wrong, but thats not a V...

C
One does see hilarious mistakes!

oagent

1,786 posts

243 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
zeppelin101 said:
wukfitz said:
wrightman90 said:
From that article "The engine have the V at an angle of 180 degrees".

Correct me if i'm wrong, but thats not a V...

C
There are two forms of horizontally opposed engines, the "proper" one where corresponding pistons are at TDC at the same time, or 180* Vs where corresponding pistons share the same crank pin and don't reach TDC at the same time.

I presume this is the latter.
For the sake of completeness there is a third type with two crank shafts and no cylinder heads, where the pistons are literally horizontally opposed.

geoffracing

617 posts

175 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
geoffracing said:
bounce
AT LAAAAST a new version of the 911.
sleep

By now Porsche must have recouped the cost of its moulds...

't would be nice one day to see a new Porsche
that has NOT got the shape of a squashed bug. spin

'Trouble is that the name "Porsche" sounds horrid.
Sort of Germanised feminine of pork. tank

zeppelin101

724 posts

192 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
oagent said:
For the sake of completeness there is a third type with two crank shafts and no cylinder heads, where the pistons are literally horizontally opposed.
That's a proper opposed-piston engine, which is substantially different (mechanically) to a "boxer".

Guvernator

13,158 posts

165 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
Arrggh, ufortunately one can not unsee what has been seen. I never thought I'd ever say this about something out of the RUF stable but dear god, that is ugly.

shamrock

980 posts

190 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all

They'd be better off trying to develop the entry level 911 so it produces 400hp.

thehardman07

147 posts

181 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
inkiboo said:
I agree; it looks as if they stopped designing.
EFA

donteatpeople

831 posts

274 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
r7ehw said:
I agree. I love the original targa shape with the curved glass back window, but this is a bonination! I note how they didn't dare send a picture of its rear view.
Pictures are on their site though, personally I quite like it.






http://www.ruf-automobile.de/en/Roadster.25d90.php

hardmouse1

61 posts

173 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
- I have a feeling that i dont like this........ hurl

kbee540

197 posts

208 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
Crikey, been on my high horse recently lambasting the endless parade of 'special edition' 911's and their comical price tags. As another poster pointed out I seem to have a bee in my bonnet on the subject. But suddenly I almost stand corrected. Ruf (Rough?) has just managed to out-naff the factory. At least the factory tart ups look OK (let's just ignore the Speedsters Sir Mix-A-Lot proportions) and only hike the prices up to slightly stupid levels.

Rumblestripe

2,942 posts

162 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
Let me see if I understand this, they want me to pay MORE for this than a standard 911? Have they looked at the prices of 930 Targas? I mean they've tried to emulate its "style"!

Now, I have a perverse liking for the 930 targa, but I wouldn't pay more for one than a standard coupé.

anything fast

983 posts

164 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
front looks like a snow plow, wheels look like they are from halfords, back spoiler looks odd, roof needs to be black, other than that i quite like it... not

these special edition 911's are getting silly

Herbs

4,916 posts

229 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
What a waste of resources.............. almost as bad as building a Porsche off roader or a 4 door version. Oh wait................ laugh

wukfitz

45 posts

235 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
oagent said:
zeppelin101 said:
wukfitz said:
wrightman90 said:
From that article "The engine have the V at an angle of 180 degrees".

Correct me if i'm wrong, but thats not a V...

C
There are two forms of horizontally opposed engines, the "proper" one where corresponding pistons are at TDC at the same time, or 180* Vs where corresponding pistons share the same crank pin and don't reach TDC at the same time.

I presume this is the latter.
For the sake of completeness there is a third type with two crank shafts and no cylinder heads, where the pistons are literally horizontally opposed.
However, all of the above said. None of the 3 forms is a V.... A V looks like this 'V' and all three variants you speak of look like this '__'




anniesdad

14,589 posts

238 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
From the front 3/4 it looks very....meh.

Rear and side profile are much better, but enough about the Ruf.

Tell us more about the bonination!

Porsche997C4S

160 posts

164 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
Horrible, why ruin a beautiful car?
Hate all the companies that modify porsches like RUF. They make them worse! :'(

Porsche997C4S

160 posts

164 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
what about the 918? :/ or is it too bug like for you?

geoffracing said:
geoffracing said:
bounce
AT LAAAAST a new version of the 911.
sleep

By now Porsche must have recouped the cost of its moulds...

't would be nice one day to see a new Porsche
that has NOT got the shape of a squashed bug. spin

'Trouble is that the name "Porsche" sounds horrid.
Sort of Germanised feminine of pork. tank