RE: SOTW: Mitsubishi 3000GT

RE: SOTW: Mitsubishi 3000GT

Author
Discussion

Agent Orange

2,194 posts

247 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
Great shed.

I was looking around the Mitsubishis this week to look for a suitable shed to suggest. Was trying to find a Starion Turbo for £1K but couldn't do it.

Remember a guy coming round to buy a 944 in one of these. Big things and very throaty! May have just been bad luck but most of these I've seen have very badly dulled paint and the seats don't seem to wear well.


Petrolhead_Rich

4,659 posts

193 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
top shedding, I keep looking at these and have a massive soft spot for them ever since my dads friend took us out for a spin in his twin turbo jobby cloud9

Mr Will

13,719 posts

207 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
My dad traded in his RX7 convertible for a 4WD NA GTO Automatic which I drove a few times.

It was pants.

GTO Scott

3,816 posts

225 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
seefarr said:
daytonafan said:
Also IIRC the non-turbo versions of these are front wheel drive!
yes Yup.


http://www.3si.org/wiki/index.php/Mitsubishi_3000G...
Wrong.

The American-spec non-turbo's were front wheel drive, this Japanese-market non-turbo will be all wheel drive.

The auto box will handle 220bhp fine. They do suffer if poorly maintained however. The auto cannot handle the 280bhp TT engine, which is why Mitsubishi never did a factory auto.

By the way, this isn't a 3000GT - as it's JDM-spec it's a GTO.

Awaits more ill-informed comments

Stoatman

592 posts

168 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
Always liked the look of these cars , but at that price and age surely a couple of things go wrong and you could be looking at a bill the size of the cars value pretty easily. Very cheap if its reliable though.

Monsterlime

1,206 posts

167 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
Great Shed!

The more time I spend with my GTO TT, the more I love it.

Agent Orange

2,194 posts

247 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
Mr Will said:
My dad traded in his RX7 convertible for a 4WD NA GTO Automatic which I drove a few times.

It was pants.
Haha...

I've never noticed it but is there a thread/email to send SOTW suggestions to?

GTO Scott

3,816 posts

225 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
Stoatman said:
Always liked the look of these cars , but at that price and age surely a couple of things go wrong and you could be looking at a bill the size of the cars value pretty easily. Very cheap if its reliable though.
Yep, can be very expensive if it's been neglected.

To be honest without seeing the car, and going on the information in the advert, the only thing i'd budget for is a cambelt change (around £650 at a specialist if done properly with tensioners, idlers, water pump etc). Maybe also change the ATF in the autobox.

Otherwise, it's a big simple unstressed cruiser.

thecremeegg

1,964 posts

204 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
Had one of these in Gran Turismo 1, was my favourite car as I could get it up to over 1000BHP biggrin

cml

715 posts

263 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
The interior is so grey. Everything is grey.

Yuch.

Riggers

1,859 posts

179 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
Agent Orange said:
Mr Will said:
My dad traded in his RX7 convertible for a 4WD NA GTO Automatic which I drove a few times.

It was pants.
Haha...

I've never noticed it but is there a thread/email to send SOTW suggestions to?
You can always e-mail me via my profile, or e-mail news@pistonheads.com

Ever-happy to hear SOTW ideas smile

Garlick

40,601 posts

241 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
Riggers said:
Ever-happy to hear SOTW ideas smile
Sometimes you come up with your own suggestions...sometimes tongue out

Johnpidge

588 posts

190 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
Have driven a very luny Turbo one with some form of anti lag device on it which even with 4 wheel/drive/steer blah blah made me st myself. Personally prefer the Twin Turbo Soarer which I had a beautiful one.

johnpeat

5,328 posts

266 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
Stoatman said:
Yep, can be very expensive if it's been neglected.

To be honest without seeing the car, and going on the information in the advert, the only thing i'd budget for is a cambelt change (around £650 at a specialist if done properly with tensioners, idlers, water pump etc). Maybe also change the ATF in the autobox.
This is a brilliant example of someone who doesn't understand 'shedding'.

Shedding isn't about spending £1000 so you can spend ANOTHER £1000 - that's what mugs and idiots do.

What you do is choose something which doesn't NEED £1000 spending on it. You buy a car which has a recent-ish cambelt and doesn't need anything obvious.

Everything else is a gamble - you don't spend £100s on preventative maintenance on a SHED - that's entering cherished car/restoration and it's mugs game at this price level.

As I pointed out on an earlier shed when someone bemoaned spending a fortune on his £1K shed before selling it - the only problem was he bought the car 1 owner too early smile

p.s. auto-electrician mate of mine spent eons under the bonnet of one of these recently - eventual solution was the replacement of something quite cheap which had corroded away BUT it took 3 weeks for the part to arrive. So it's less about parts cost and more about having someone who knows what they're doing (less labour) and patience/another car to use meanwhile!!

Edited by johnpeat on Friday 26th November 13:47

plenty

4,691 posts

187 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
Is this penance for the somewhat questionable PH Zeroes piece a while back?

esvcg

851 posts

186 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
johnpeat said:
GTO Scott said:
Stoatman said:
Yep, can be very expensive if it's been neglected.

To be honest without seeing the car, and going on the information in the advert, the only thing i'd budget for is a cambelt change (around £650 at a specialist if done properly with tensioners, idlers, water pump etc). Maybe also change the ATF in the autobox.
This is a brilliant example of someone who doesn't understand 'shedding'.

Shedding isn't about spending £1000 so you can spend ANOTHER £1000 - that's what mugs and idiots do.

What you do is choose something which doesn't NEED £1000 spending on it. You buy a car which has a recent-ish cambelt and doesn't need anything obvious.

Everything else is a gamble - you don't spend £100s on preventative maintenance on a SHED - that's entering cherished car/restoration and it's mugs game at this price level.

As I pointed out on an earlier shed when someone bemoaned spending a fortune on his £1K shed before selling it - the only problem was he bought the car 1 owner too early smile

p.s. auto-electrician mate of mine spent eons under the bonnet of one of these recently - eventual solution was the replacement of something quite cheap which had corroded away BUT it took 3 weeks for the part to arrive. So it's less about parts cost and more about having someone who knows what they're doing (less labour) and patience/another car to use meanwhile!!
Exactly. I got a 94 Merc W124 E220 for £560 that came with a full 12 months MOT, and it had new brake discs, pads and a service with all fluids done etc. Six months on have only spent £25 in repairs - this is my idea of shed motoring!

hairykrishna

13,169 posts

204 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
I've always fancied one of the turbo ones of these - I nearly bought one last winter. Their reputation for big bills and slightly remote feeling handling has always put me off though. Don't they do 0-60 in ~5 seconds despite weighing as much as the moon?

ellisd82

685 posts

209 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
Good SOTW....for another £500 you can get a newer TT version cool

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/2269691.htm

Or for a small £105 (and some risk) you can have a 65k model

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/2172954.htm



Edited by ellisd82 on Friday 26th November 14:00

jackbarclay

52 posts

179 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
I never really understood where the 3000gt name came from. I always felt that the supra should have been called this as a continuation of the classic 2000gt. Although I suppose this was realised in the TRD 3000gt. Does Mitsubishi have any claim to "3000gt"?

daveco

4,128 posts

208 months

Friday 26th November 2010
quotequote all
jackbarclay said:
I never really understood where the 3000gt name came from. I always felt that the supra should have been called this as a continuation of the classic 2000gt. Although I suppose this was realised in the TRD 3000gt. Does Mitsubishi have any claim to "3000gt"?
Isn't it a 3.0 litre hence the 3000?
This NA version probably takes around 10 seconds to 60; no thanks!