Driven: Abarth 500C
Abarth time for Garlick. (And about time too, you might hear it whispered...)
![PHer Garlick's 'scorpion'-styled steed was two-tone....](http://images.pistonheads.com/nimg/22967/500office.jpg)
PHer Garlick's 'scorpion'-styled steed was two-tone....
I'm a fan of small FWD cars and have good memories of my old JCW MINI Cooper S. The Abarth is a similar proposition, with its image being what most drivers will judge before ever giving it a chance dynamically. This being PH Open Season, the 500 we've blagged is the C version, which means it has the almost pram-like opening roof in a style (not dissimilar to the old BMW Baur cars) giving it an open feel. But to be honest, with so much metal around you it's easy to forget it's open at all... Well, compared to my TVR, and our other Open Season drives at least.
For reasons known only to Abarth, the C version is only available with the automated 'Competizione' gearbox, which gives you a few buttons where the gearstick would be and paddles on the steering wheel. Leave it in auto and you have a fairly jerky change, but point it down a B-road, press the Sport button for a faster shift (it artificially weights-up the steering too), lift off slightly as you change gear and you'll be laughing out loud as the 1.4 turbo whisks you down the road at an unexpected lick. On a run from London to Goodwood we had a ball, as the turbo motor left us feeling there wasn't anything we couldn't pass safely. If the handling feels a little skittish at times, it is completely predictable and the rasp from the twin exhausts is addictive - especially with the roof open.
There is a compromise to all of this fun though, and that's down to the 'C' conversion. You really can feel the car twist and shake when pushing on, which is a shame as the roof-down experience really adds to the character of the car. So in spite of the buzz of listening to the turbo spinning and the exhaust popping, as a true PHer I suspect you might want to opt for the metal roof. It's worth mentioning at this point that the Abarth C has a slightly softer suspension set up than the hardtop too (to appeal to women drivers apparently...), so the hardtop is certainly the enthusiasts' choice.
The looks may divide opinion, but we reckon it looks the part in the colour combination we tested. OK, so perhaps it's over-styled in places and some of the design touches are at the detriment of functionality; the good looking steering wheel is too thick and doesn't adjust enough, you can't read the combined speedo and rev-counter at a glance, the rear window needs a wiper and you can't ignore the fact that sitting in traffic with the roof-down is a touch embarrassing. (Garlick, you love it... Ed.)
It's not cheap either, and will set you back over £17,000 as standard. Our car came loaded with options - leather seats, climate control, upgraded hi-fi, two-tone paint and painted 17'' wheels, all pushing the price up further. The 1.4 engine delivers 140bhp which equates to a 0-60 time of 7.8 seconds and a top speed of 127mph, but there is an 'Esseesse' pack available which takes this to 160bhp along with Esseesse badging too.
I really enjoyed this car, but I knew that after a week I would be able to give it back. In reality, if you want the open experience in your 500 you really should choose a lower model with a small engine and buzz around town in style, not noticing the shake and flex.
If you want the full Abarth experience however (and I recommend that you do) then save yourself some money and choose the non-C version. You'll appreciate the solidity only a roof can offer, it gives you the auto/ manual choice, you get better suspension and you'll have a fantastic looking driver's car. It might not be quite as fast or polished as its German MINI rival, but isn't that all part of the Italian charm?
Now if they did a 200bhp example I would be interested and would take it over a mini, A1 maybe not the DS3-R though!
most people get them (non essesse) to the 170 mark (for about 300 quid) unless your name is LargerLout and 300 is more what you were looking for!
I really do think the Abarth 500 SS is the best car in the super mini segment at the moment. Its relatively economical (fuel and insurance,) it looks quirky, sounds great has a fantastic interior (especially when you compare it to the Clio,) and its fast enough to put a grin on your face.
I really do think the Abarth 500 SS is the best car in the super mini segment at the moment. Its relatively economical (fuel and insurance,) it looks quirky, sounds great has a fantastic interior (especially when you compare it to the Clio,) and its fast enough to put a grin on your face.
I second that.I have a Clio 200 and an Abarth 500 135bhp and I love them both.The Clio is more focussed but not as much of an occasion to drive
![hehe](/inc/images/hehe.gif)
![hehe](/inc/images/hehe.gif)
Trying to compare the performance of two different cars when driven by two different people is a waste of time anyway and by now everyone on here should know that too!
One last thought - the Alfa 145 cloverleaf manages to pull 62mph in 8.3s - that is a full 0.5s slower than the Abarth, the 2007 Cooper S is over a second quicker again than the non-esseesse A500. The esseesse version pegs the cooper s pretty much exactly (just a fraction slower). Given how much better both the Mini and the A500 handle compared with the 145 I reckon your little race with a cooper was a long, long way from indicative of the relative performance of the cars. The only thing your 145 has over the A500 is a v-max about 5mph higher...
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff