RE: Pagani Huayra: Official Pics And Specs

RE: Pagani Huayra: Official Pics And Specs

Author
Discussion

ph123

1,841 posts

219 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
Pure automotive fine art, just like the Zonda.
The work of a genius. Have you seen the factory? Tiny.

silverthorn2151

6,298 posts

180 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
Simply stunning. Looks great from every angle in my view, even the front.

clorenzen

3,676 posts

236 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
Looks like the F458 - just messier.

j123

881 posts

193 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
I can immagine what Pagani could have done if his brief was: make it smaller, more nimble, lighter, with better visibility- and make it naturally aspirated. IT would have been an amazing thing! alas this is none of the above and expensive. j

tonym911

16,554 posts

206 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
How do you pronounce Huayra?

zakelwe

4,449 posts

199 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
tonym911 said:
How do you pronounce Huayra?
According to Autocar, Wirer.

Andy

Johnny

9,652 posts

285 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
tonym911 said:
How do you pronounce Huayra?
Whoareya... wink

RTH

1,057 posts

213 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
At £850,000 , hands up all of you reading who will definitely be buying one? So it will be an object we look at rather than drive.

TrackSlagJames

1 posts

160 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
Looks gash compared to the Zonda

Oelholm

321 posts

186 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
I have a feeling that if the front, eh, bar in the grill (if that makes any sense) was painted in the body colour, it wouldn't look as akward...

Though it must be said that these pictures are immensely better looking than those first posted! Guess it is a tad colour sensitive.

Dr S

4,997 posts

227 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
Single clutch paddle shift does not sound state of the art for a 850k car...

DS240

4,677 posts

219 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
Like it, and it will look better in a different colour. Awful launch pic colour.

Life Saab Itch

37,068 posts

189 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
Meh.

That does nothing for me, just the same as it's predecessor.

KrissJ

202 posts

184 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
I'm a fan of flamboyance in supercars and the Zonda still stands as one of my all-time favourite cars. This, however, is most underwhelming. That front end is awful, like a woman with no chin, and I'm not overly keen on the back end either. I don't even think the gull-wing doors work on that car. What a shame; hopefully it'll be a grower. smile One thing's for sure though, it's going to be immensely quick! It should handle superbly too, going by the Zonda, and it looks like Pagani have kept up their knack for exquisite detailing.

Edited by KrissJ on Wednesday 26th January 08:07

Amizade

284 posts

226 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
looks like its begging for an F430/stratos style bodyshell makeover.

Looks like all that Zonda success has blunted Pagani's eye for design

anniesdad

14,589 posts

239 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
It needs a front splitter......but that's about all.


Agoogy

7,274 posts

249 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
Is the person thats driving it 9? or is it really that massive?

It seems every major supercar maker is following Porsch's'school of design (apart from Ferrari), not altogether appealing evolution over progressive revolution... shame.

PHmember

2,487 posts

172 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
zakelwe said:
How do you close the doors sitting down, they look very high.

Andy
That's the butler's job, you worry too much.

Monty Python

4,812 posts

198 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
Bit too much Koeingsegg going on there with the cab-forward design and long rear deck. However, I guess if you use the same CFD program to do your aerodynamics on you'll probably end up with the same result.

It's a shame that car design is now done more and more by a computer than a real person, but I guess if you need to optimize drag and downforce without sacrificing speed then you need a computer to do it.

chelme

1,353 posts

171 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
£850 for an ugly fish that does 0-60 in 3.5 seconds using a Merc engine? No thanks.The old one at least looked good.