RE: Pic Of The Week: F1's Golden Years

RE: Pic Of The Week: F1's Golden Years

Author
Discussion

freedman

5,417 posts

207 months

Friday 28th January 2011
quotequote all
Kaiser_Wull said:
Ronnie Peterson was indeed killed at the wheel of a Lotus 78, which was his 'T' car. There was a 79 'T' car available that weekend but I can't remember if it was also damaged before the race or if it was reserved for Ronnie's team-mate.

Ronnie was one of the most naturally talented and spectacular drivers in the history of F1. He should have won a world championship, as should Gilles Villeneuve and Stirling Moss.
Technicality maybe, but he had his accident in the 78, but died as a result of complications from surgery on his legs the next day in hospital

Had the accident been ion the UK or Germnay (for instance) I have no doubt he would have survived



abz24

12 posts

178 months

Friday 28th January 2011
quotequote all
DaveShark said:
I'l see your 1978 and raise you:

Call (Hakkinen, MP4/8, Australia 1993)


fatboy69

9,372 posts

187 months

Friday 28th January 2011
quotequote all
JPS Lotus 79 - the most beautiful F1 ever built.

With regards to Ronnies's death in the Lotus 78 there were, if i re-call correctly, only three Lotus 79's at the Italian GP. Ronnie had one, which suffered from mechanical problems hence he qualified the type 78 in 5th place, & Mario had two - his race car & his T-car.

I seem to re-call that the T-car was set up for Mario & there wasnt enough time to change the pedals & the other settings before the start of the GP hence Ronnie started the race in the 78.

Sadly we will never know whether the accident would have occured if Ronnie has been in the 79 or whether he would have died in any other country.

The other 'tragedy' was th blame for the accident being placed, wrongly, on the shoulders of Riccardo Patrese. He didnt cause the accident event though he was involved to a degree. The accident was caused because the track got narrower towards the approach to the first corner, the field bunched up, Patrese & James Hunt touched & the rest, sadly, is history.

It was just a racing accident for which Patrese was wrongly pilloried by many in the F1 fraternity.

No matter what happened it was a tragic waste of great race driver.


Stuartyvilla

128 posts

160 months

Friday 28th January 2011
quotequote all
Amazing pictures, love that CSL!

kiteless

11,711 posts

204 months

Friday 28th January 2011
quotequote all
Now, all of my works laptop wallpapers have been sourced from either here:

Cool Aircraft Pics

Or here:

Cool Motorsport Pics

But that CSL one is being used from Monday onwards cloud9


Dangermouse78

120 posts

173 months

Saturday 29th January 2011
quotequote all
I love how alot of people say that the 79 is the best looking F1 or the best looking Lotus, Surely you can't have forgotten the 49 OR 72? The 79 IS gorgeous however & that pic at brands just looks so right, Mario leading the pack

El Guapo

2,787 posts

190 months

Saturday 29th January 2011
quotequote all
alecbarclay said:
Very, very good................ except for the tobacco sponsorship on many of the teams livery (Gitanes just visible at the back).

dinkel

26,951 posts

258 months

Saturday 29th January 2011
quotequote all

Ronnie vs The Depp.


Ronnie again wink


simonpeter

188 posts

159 months

Monday 31st January 2011
quotequote all
Are there any other geeks that can recognise all 14 cars and drivers in the picture? Was a great time for F1

urquattro

755 posts

186 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all

F1 at Brands Hatch was superb, also the big V8 in Formula Atlantic, Form 5000 etc, that was a time never to return for cars and drivers. Got blown of the hill by incoming helicopter there and lost pocket money grovelling in the grass, !

Kaiser_Wull

149 posts

180 months

Wednesday 2nd February 2011
quotequote all
fatboy69 said:
JPS Lotus 79 - the most beautiful F1 ever built.

The other 'tragedy' was th blame for the accident being placed, wrongly, on the shoulders of Riccardo Patrese. He didnt cause the accident event though he was involved to a degree. The accident was caused because the track got narrower towards the approach to the first corner, the field bunched up, Patrese & James Hunt touched & the rest, sadly, is history.

It was just a racing accident for which Patrese was wrongly pilloried by many in the F1 fraternity.

No matter what happened it was a tragic waste of great race driver.
Hard to disagree re. the Lotus 79 - in JPS colours, that is. It didn't look quite so sharp in the green colour scheme adopted for 1979, though. The Lotus 97T was also a pretty car IMO.

Can't argue re. Patrese, either. It must have been hard for the bloke at the time. Fortunately, people's views of that accident and Patrese changed over time - though James Hunt always seemed to give him a hard time when he was commentating on F1.







Kaiser_Wull

149 posts

180 months

Wednesday 2nd February 2011
quotequote all
freedman said:
Technicality maybe, but he had his accident in the 78, but died as a result of complications from surgery on his legs the next day in hospital

Had the accident been ion the UK or Germnay (for instance) I have no doubt he would have survived
The operation on Ronnie's legs was initially thought to have been a complete success. However, bone marrow seeped into his bloodstream and formed embolisms, which resulted in his death. It's hard to say, not being a medic, whether that was wholly avoidable or not with the surgical tools and procedures in use in 1978.





DJC

23,563 posts

236 months

Wednesday 2nd February 2011
quotequote all
Hunt never forgave Patrese. Simple as that.

Like much with Hunt, right or wrong was irrelevent, once he had made up his mind he couldnt and didnt deviate from it.