Cars looking different for the USA market

Cars looking different for the USA market

Author
Discussion

Motorrad

6,811 posts

188 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
Benmac said:
IIRC all this bumper stuff is because the US regs have a requirement for no damage to be suffered in bumps up to a certain speed (10mph?). ]
It's 5mph and I've quoted the federal regulation had you or any else bothered to read the fecking thread.

CampDavid

9,145 posts

199 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
Benmac said:
Yep the Kia version has the US spec nose and different rear lights to both the US and UK versions as by then the REnault lights weren't available (or the french just wouldn't sell them to the koreans!)
Shame Kia never got the Elan right. Could have been a brilliant budget roadster if they'd kept the handling just so like the original.

Still, I guess it means that your one keeps it's value and status so not all bad

wibble cb

3,613 posts

208 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
the headlamp thing was so that you could replace bulbs easily and cheaply, without specialist parts.....why I don't know though, maybe US drivers moaned about headlight part costs.

Bricol

140 posts

168 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
As I understood the lighting thing from working over there, the US DOT only approved certain lamps and so everyone had to fit them. If you wander into a Walmart/K-Mart or Autozone etc, you will see racks of the same lamps - and only a few newer ones. Hence all the European manufacturers had to bodge, sorry, carefully alter their light arrangements to use the same lamps.

US regulations also required a certain percentage of light to be sent upwards to illuminate the road signs - it you look at some of the older interstate overhead signs, they aren't illuminated, but have reflective studs set into them - like our old signs (1930's era) used to do. Which makes driving in fog or falling snow pretty interesting from the refracted light just where you don't want it! If you watch a older US vehicle (say up to late 90's) go past in light falling snow, there is an interesting and pretty effect of two vertical beams of lit up snow flakes above each headlamp - and hopeless for seeing past properly.

I think it wasn't until recently they officially allowed halogen lamps (like in the last 10 / 15 years). Certainly aftermarket HID are distinctly not approved - 5 yrs ago they were slapping $1000 fines on the sellers of the kits per instance - so if they sold a kit for two headlamps, another kit for the two main beams, and maybe a kit for the fog lamps - that was $6000! So they were buying them back pretty quick!

Bri

Mastodon2

13,826 posts

166 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
I have come close to vomiting several times since opening this thread!

Deranged Granny

2,313 posts

169 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
Der Wachauring said:
From the posts so far, I am concluding that the more luxury cars (Mercs, Jags, Rolls and even the Volvo) look better in US spec.
Are you stting me?

Am I the ONLY one who thinks all the US cars, without exception, look far, far worse??

fourwheelsteer

869 posts

253 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
Deranged Granny said:
Der Wachauring said:
From the posts so far, I am concluding that the more luxury cars (Mercs, Jags, Rolls and even the Volvo) look better in US spec.
Are you stting me?

Am I the ONLY one who thinks all the US cars, without exception, look far, far worse??
No you're not - nothing seems to ruin the looks of a car more effectively than the worst efforts of US Federal legislation.

Why is it that rule makers focus on the wrong things, legislating the means rather than the ends and generally fouling up everything they touch?

davepoth

29,395 posts

200 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
They do look worse.



Count the wipers.

This is what happens when small companies adapt cars for the US market on a shoestring.

DrYazz

881 posts

180 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
Mastodon2 said:
I have come close to vomiting several times since opening this thread!
Then hopefully this can finally induce emesis:



The US version of the venerable VW Golf. Judging by the size of the bumpers, it appears to be rhino-proof.

EDLT

15,421 posts

207 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
davepoth said:
They do look worse.



Count the wipers.

This is what happens when small companies adapt cars for the US market on a shoestring.
I don't know, the owner seems to be enjoying it!

Twincam16

27,646 posts

259 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
Deranged Granny said:
Der Wachauring said:
From the posts so far, I am concluding that the more luxury cars (Mercs, Jags, Rolls and even the Volvo) look better in US spec.
Are you stting me?

Am I the ONLY one who thinks all the US cars, without exception, look far, far worse??
No, I agree, especially the Citroens. The only exception is the XJS, simply because round headlights have always been a Jaguar trademark and I think they give the XJS some Jaguar identity, which from many angles it sorely lacks.

It would've looked great without the rear buttresses and with round lights with the bodywork fluted in between them like an X300, come to think of it.

Chiswickboy

549 posts

189 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
Caulkhead said:
Err, no. This is a properly federalised E-Type (or XKE as they were known locally):



Apologies to those who have now gone blind! weeping
I think this makes it look like a stingray. The fish that is, not the car.

davepoth

29,395 posts

200 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
Chiswickboy said:
I think this makes it look like a stingray. The fish that is, not the car.
I thought of this.


Der Wachauring

Original Poster:

14 posts

158 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
Deranged Granny said:
Der Wachauring said:
From the posts so far, I am concluding that the more luxury cars (Mercs, Jags, Rolls and even the Volvo) look better in US spec.
Are you stting me?

Am I the ONLY one who thinks all the US cars, without exception, look far, far worse??
No, I am not stting you. I think the twin circular lamps on the Mercs and Jaguars and twin sqaure lamps on the Rolls really suit the cars well.
Some of the bumper details are a bit fussy, but they are do give these cars a different look, and that is interesting in itself.

Swoxy

2,801 posts

211 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
Wow, thanks USA (more info on the F1 here) ...



























Edited by Swoxy on Saturday 26th March 17:31

Der Wachauring

Original Poster:

14 posts

158 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
Swoxy said:
Wow, thanks USA (more info on the F1 here) ...



























Edited by Swoxy on Saturday 26th March 17:31
Thanks for posting those pictures. They have butchered that McLaren. That is a botch-up of shocking automotive proportions.

The green Golf looks good though.

VeeFour

3,339 posts

163 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
Bricol said:
As I understood the lighting thing from working over there, the US DOT only approved certain lamps and so everyone had to fit them.
That's my understanding - DOT approved sealed beam units. Nasty.

hondafanatic

4,969 posts

202 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
Der Wachauring said:
The green Golf looks good though.
Golf?

43034

2,963 posts

169 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
hondafanatic said:
Golf?
Rabbit, if you really want to be pedantic.

Big Rod

6,200 posts

217 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
Twincam16 said:
Biggest crime of the lot was the US-market Citroen DS and SM:

Sorry, but I think that looks absolutely awesome! First one I've seen that I think looks better in US spec'!


getmecoat