Taxi on my lawn

Author
Discussion

Dixie68

3,091 posts

188 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
Bit of an unfortunate colour of trousers to be wearing after an accident like that wink
A mysterious white van eh? You didn't notice if he was zipping up his flies when he got out of the car did you? scratchchin

SD1992

7,266 posts

159 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
It has always amazed me how taxi drivers never seem to get done for speeding. Not once have I ever been in a taxi going at the limit - always 10 to 20 mph over regardless of the roads or conditions.

Seems strange how the car went through the hedge, across a field, and still managed to not only hit the ditch, but go right over the ditch into your garden? Must have been going hell of a fast.

And these tyres can't be legal. It looks like he has possibly had them re cut? But why do that in the first place?

G350

382 posts

164 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
Greeny said:
...it's dumped in the field still, the lifting strap broke while the fork lift had it 6 feet in the air...
laugh

Great pics!

Any sign of skid marks further up the road?

Do you know who called the cops?

Do you think the airbags went off when the car ripped the tree stump out or seconds later when it smashed into and bounced over that deep ditch?

XDA

2,141 posts

186 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
SD1992 said:
It has always amazed me how taxi drivers never seem to get done for speeding. Not once have I ever been in a taxi going at the limit - always 10 to 20 mph over regardless of the roads or conditions.
Agreed. It seems that the police turn a blind eye to taxi drivers for some reason.

Mr POD

5,153 posts

193 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
XDA said:
Agreed. It seems that the police turn a blind eye to taxi drivers for some reason.
Because they get the pissed people off the streets, and the faster the better so there's less violence perhaps ?

Greeny

Original Poster:

1,421 posts

260 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
G350 said:
laugh

Great pics!

Any sign of skid marks further up the road?

Do you know who called the cops?

Do you think the airbags went off when the car ripped the tree stump out or seconds later when it smashed into and bounced over that deep ditch?
No skid marks on the road, air bags 'deployed on landing', I called the police due to identification 'issues'
ETA, the police said "no one was hurt, and a st car is off the road for good, sort of a result"

Edited by Greeny on Sunday 3rd April 00:00

r11co

6,244 posts

231 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
John D. said:
You think tread on a road tyre would have helped 'cross country'? I doubt it!!
This!

And if the road was dry then the less tread the better. Shows how conditioned some of us are that presented with such a situation all we wonder is why driver wasn't prosecuted for the 'technically illegal' tyres.

'Least of our worries' is correctly what plod was probably thinking.....

Greeny said:
the police said "no one was hurt, and a st car is off the road for good, sort of a result"
Ah yes. Police discretion. Be grateful for it folks - it saves us all money. To many of us have been infected by the zealots....

Edited by r11co on Sunday 3rd April 00:06

caffeine

1,021 posts

191 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
Greeny said:
Are they filming the fifth installment?





mcford

819 posts

175 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
The tyres look perfectly good enough to pass an MOT to me. If the lateral grooves are not cut as deep as the main circumferal grooves to start with, then the area where the lateral grooves are/were is not a valid part of the tyre from which to take a tread depth measurement. As long as there are no cords showing, they're legal.

Whereas the registration plate on one of the background vehicles would fail an MOT.

Edited by mcford on Sunday 3rd April 06:25

Ari

19,353 posts

216 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
Greeny said:
No skid marks on the road, air bags 'deployed on landing', I called the police due to identification 'issues'
ETA, the police said "no one was hurt, and a st car is off the road for good, sort of a result"

Edited by Greeny on Sunday 3rd April 00:00
So they're not prosecuting!!!?

Jasandjules

69,960 posts

230 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
Did anyone get his number? I need to get to Central London quickly on Thursday and I reckon he'll get me there on time.............

The road where he came off, is it straight (looks like it from the picture) - I was expecting there to be a sharp bend but the tarmac looks straight enough!?!? So it could be he's telling the truth and had to swerve to GTFO of the way of something?

I mean, if he was engaged in activities sung about in Sex on Fire, then he'd have gone off the end of a road not sideways off a straight?!

Vieste

10,532 posts

161 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
mcford said:
The tyres look perfectly good enough to pass an MOT to me. If the lateral grooves are not cut as deep as the main circumferal grooves to start with, then the area where the lateral grooves are/were is not a valid part of the tyre from which to take a tread depth measurement. As long as there are no cords showing, they're legal.

Whereas the registration plate on one of the background vehicles would fail an MOT.

Edited by mcford on Sunday 3rd April 06:25
rolleyes

GuinnessMK

1,608 posts

223 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
Impressive!

Did he get a tip?


CO2000

3,177 posts

210 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all

Jasandjules said:
Did anyone get his number? I need to get to Central London quickly on Thursday and I reckon he'll get me there on time.............
If it's a Central London A&E your wanting to go to you're on a winner biggrin

however you may end up in one closer to your start point though!

jake15919

738 posts

166 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
Greeny said:
air bags 'deployed on landing'

Edited by Greeny on Sunday 3rd April 00:00
You have a wonderful way with words. smile

I realise the tyres were dodgy but damp/wet grass has the same friction coefficient as wet ice. Lucky no one got hurt.


Liquid Knight

15,754 posts

184 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
caffeine said:
Are they filming the fifth installment?

Not yet but it's being scripted. Marion Cotillard is being a bit of a diva about it as well. rolleyes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVNzRNZDllI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqSqdTA4TWo

Peugeot have pulled out as well. frown

Liquid Knight

15,754 posts

184 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
Why do the septics have to ruin everything? rolleyes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkHT6ReY-s8

Thank feck they only made one.

busta

4,504 posts

234 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
Vieste said:
mcford said:
The tyres look perfectly good enough to pass an MOT to me. If the lateral grooves are not cut as deep as the main circumferal grooves to start with, then the area where the lateral grooves are/were is not a valid part of the tyre from which to take a tread depth measurement. As long as there are no cords showing, they're legal.

Whereas the registration plate on one of the background vehicles would fail an MOT.

Edited by mcford on Sunday 3rd April 06:25
rolleyes
He does make a valid point. People are getting all high and mighty about these 'illegal tyres' when they may well be perfectly legal. They certainly seem to have enough depth of tread. And when it comes to stopping on mud and grass, nothing short of a Trelleborg TM700 would have made much difference.

Liquid Knight

15,754 posts

184 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
The Police probably aren't pursuing the tyre issue because the "Dangerous Driving" is far more important.


Is it just me or is it because there's a taxi in a field there's a lot of soapbox action? If it were the usual TVR/911/other widow maker in a field it would "bad luck, oil/diesel/ice on the road etc blah-blah-blah spirited drive gone wrong nuns tits". This chap is a pillock who has made a mistake and undoubtedly will be paying for it for a long time to come. How car insurance is for normal drivers at the moment I certainly wouldn't want DD40 and a fine or ban on my licence and single vehicle accident write off plus passenger injury shysters for you claim on my history. I doubte he'll be driving a Taxi again. rolleyes

Jasandjules

69,960 posts

230 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
GuinnessMK said:
Impressive!

Did he get a tip?
I think the OP advised him next time to press the f****ng brake pedal.