Would you buy a car with high miles?

Would you buy a car with high miles?

Author
Discussion

M3333

2,264 posts

215 months

Saturday 23rd April 2011
quotequote all
I would rather take a vehicle that had completed 100k on the motorway than one that had completed 50k in town/city Traffic.

A vehicle with high mileage still has loads of life left if it has a good documented history and has spent most of its life as a motorway mile muncher.

Nothing worse than a low mileage vehicle that has always done short runs, never getting to a decent operating temperature, had loads of gear changes and never really been used properley.

The e39 has been mentioned a few times on this thread, amazing vehicles even with galactic miles.

icepop

1,177 posts

208 months

Saturday 23rd April 2011
quotequote all
Well I've learnt my lesson with my last car, a VW 1.9 TDI, where everyone said, "the engines will run to 250k with very little problems", and yes they might well do. But the bits that make the engine go, i.e injectors/turbo/fuel pump, and in the case of the 1.9 VW engine, cams, don't.

So. if you are picking up a 100k diesel engine,(and to some extent) a turbo petrol engine, then, there's a good chance you are possibly going to see, as i did, within the next 30k miles;

£1200 for a new turbo
£600 x 4 for the injectors = £2400
£300 for the tandem fuel pump + extra for the lift pump.
+ numerous other little diagnostic checks around the above, they all add up.

So after my last diesel, I've gone back to petrol......nope, the savings in fuel are still way better than petrol for me, but I'm putting £2k away a year to allow me to change my SEAT sport, after 4 years and less than 100k miles, before I get into the same catch 22 situation I was in with my last motor, not knowing whether to repair or replace the car.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Saturday 23rd April 2011
quotequote all
I've done 320,000 miles in my 2004 Mondy TDci and it's running like a new car. Always run on BP.

MondeoMan1981

2,357 posts

184 months

Saturday 23rd April 2011
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
I've done 320,000 miles in my 2004 Mondy TDci and it's running like a new car. Always run on BP.
Original clutch and dmf ?

Robatr0n

12,362 posts

217 months

Sunday 24th April 2011
quotequote all
In a word, yes. yes

I bought my 2.0 Audi Coupe when it was sitting on 130k miles. I sold it when it was sat on 174k miles. I had 44k miles of motoring bliss and I'm 100% certain it would have lasted another 170k if it wasn't for the prat who bought it and killed it on the journey home. cry

The S2 was sat on 133k miles when I bought it 5 years ago and it's now covered 163k miles (and for sale.. frown) but it's in fantastic condition and really feels quite rapid, even by today's standards. I'm certainly going to miss it.

The 540i I've recently bought is sat on 124k miles and feels fairly tight and has lost all of 3bhp since 1996 when it rolled off the production line. I suspect this will last me a long while yet!

icepop

1,177 posts

208 months

Sunday 24th April 2011
quotequote all
That's the problem with reported high mileage motors, they're like Triggers Broom, Iknow, I owned one, they don't tell of the amount of work and cost to get them to those miles. I'm certain people own cars that have gone big miles, and cost them little, but I'd wager they are in the minority, and lets face it even the specialists, not dealers, say that at 150k you are looking at new injectors on the VAG PD engines, cheapest I saw them at was £450 each.

There's alot of talk and reports coming in lately from different forums, club sites, directed at the cost of the long term maintenance of modern performance diesels, like the PD/TDCI/D's, due to the costs of the injectors/turbos/high pressure pumps/DM flywheels etc, these engines are now starting to hit those high mileages, before that they were just the good old fashioned low performance diesels, and the cracks are starting to show, case of, fine when they are running, but potential money pits, for the private owner when they a not. Of course alot of this issue is covered over by the fact that the majority are run by companies and fleets and, they used to pay whatever the cost, but as the strings start to get pulled tighter, maybe this feature of modern diesels might be highlighted more, I've certainly seen it mentioned on one or two sites, and magazines.

Edited by icepop on Sunday 24th April 00:41

Robatr0n

12,362 posts

217 months

Sunday 24th April 2011
quotequote all
icepop said:
That's the problem with reported high mileage motors, they're like Triggers Broom, Iknow, I owned one, they don't tell of the amount of work and cost to get them to those miles. I'm certain people own cars that have gone big miles, and cost them little, but I'd wager they are in the minority, and lets face it even the specialists, not dealers, say that at 150k you are looking at new injectors on the VAG PD engines, cheapest I saw them at was £450 each.
To an extent, you're right I guess.

My S2 still has all the original running gear, original turbo, original and unmolested engine and the original gearbox which is pretty impressive after 160k miles and 20 years! The only things changed/upgraded is the brakes (originals were good until you used them heavily more than four times in quick succession), suspension, air-intake (replaced with RS2 air-intake) and a re-map.

If you do your homework, you can find a decent car with sensible upgrades for sensible money. Older cars often go through consumables a little more often but then again, they're just that, consumables.

When I'm sat in a slightly better situation, I'll be on the hunt for an E39 M5 that has been well maintained and looked after regardless of how many miles it has covered.

ambuletz

10,754 posts

182 months

Sunday 24th April 2011
quotequote all
miles seem to matter little to e46 coupe owners (or maybe they're delusional?). I seem to see 100k-150k cars vary anywhere from £1500-5000

ensignia

921 posts

236 months

Sunday 24th April 2011
quotequote all
The only high-mileage car I wouldn't even consider would be an RX-8. Every other car is fair game if everything else checks out.

Blue Oval84

5,276 posts

162 months

Sunday 24th April 2011
quotequote all
Just bought a 141K BMW 530i Auto. The only bit that I'm particularly nervous about is the autobox, the suspension also feels a little tired, but overall, she's wearing her miles well. smile

ShayneJ

1,073 posts

180 months

Sunday 24th April 2011
quotequote all
Rotary powered motors aside.

Miles do not matter its how they were done that matters.

Buy on condition and history.

icepop

1,177 posts

208 months

Sunday 24th April 2011
quotequote all
Robatr0n said:
icepop said:
That's the problem with reported high mileage motors, they're like Triggers Broom, Iknow, I owned one, they don't tell of the amount of work and cost to get them to those miles. I'm certain people own cars that have gone big miles, and cost them little, but I'd wager they are in the minority, and lets face it even the specialists, not dealers, say that at 150k you are looking at new injectors on the VAG PD engines, cheapest I saw them at was £450 each.
To an extent, you're right I guess.

My S2 still has all the original running gear, original turbo, original and unmolested engine and the original gearbox which is pretty impressive after 160k miles and 20 years! The only things changed/upgraded is the brakes (originals were good until you used them heavily more than four times in quick succession), suspension, air-intake (replaced with RS2 air-intake) and a re-map.

If you do your homework, you can find a decent car with sensible upgrades for sensible money. Older cars often go through consumables a little more often but then again, they're just that, consumables.

When I'm sat in a slightly better situation, I'll be on the hunt for an E39 M5 that has been well maintained and looked after regardless of how many miles it has covered.
It's an interesting thought perhaps that, at the same mileage and full dealer history, but only after 10 years, my car was starting to bring in the big bills. Maybe it's a combination of total miles and time taken to cover said mileage.

Pappa Lurve

3,827 posts

283 months

Sunday 24th April 2011
quotequote all
S8, 241k on clock when i bought her a few weeks back. 2k in and she is returning better than spec MPG, pulls like a train and handles great. Only clue as to the mileage is an occasionally rough change from neutral to reverse. Great car and any car with a decent sized engine that has been well looked after should go on for a huge milage without too much of a problem.

billzeebub

3,865 posts

200 months

Sunday 24th April 2011
quotequote all
I have always owned quality marques. Usually high milers with full service history and receipts, low total owners and try to buy from a well heeled sort. There are a great many middle class professional people who keep their cars for several years..those are the ones I go for..and try to research original factory specs and go for one of those..never had a problem following these rules..and never needed to hpi or had any hidden problems

as long as modern cars are well serviced they should keep going..particularly the premium brands..though some modern cars do rely rather heavily on technology/electrics and I wonder what the long term cost of fettling all these gizmos will be!!?

Robatr0n

12,362 posts

217 months

Sunday 24th April 2011
quotequote all
icepop said:
Robatr0n said:
icepop said:
That's the problem with reported high mileage motors, they're like Triggers Broom, Iknow, I owned one, they don't tell of the amount of work and cost to get them to those miles. I'm certain people own cars that have gone big miles, and cost them little, but I'd wager they are in the minority, and lets face it even the specialists, not dealers, say that at 150k you are looking at new injectors on the VAG PD engines, cheapest I saw them at was £450 each.
To an extent, you're right I guess.

My S2 still has all the original running gear, original turbo, original and unmolested engine and the original gearbox which is pretty impressive after 160k miles and 20 years! The only things changed/upgraded is the brakes (originals were good until you used them heavily more than four times in quick succession), suspension, air-intake (replaced with RS2 air-intake) and a re-map.

If you do your homework, you can find a decent car with sensible upgrades for sensible money. Older cars often go through consumables a little more often but then again, they're just that, consumables.

When I'm sat in a slightly better situation, I'll be on the hunt for an E39 M5 that has been well maintained and looked after regardless of how many miles it has covered.
It's an interesting thought perhaps that, at the same mileage and full dealer history, but only after 10 years, my car was starting to bring in the big bills. Maybe it's a combination of total miles and time taken to cover said mileage.
Perhaps!

But we have to remember that buying second hand is always an unknown quantity. As it happens, I'd rather have a car that has been owned by an enthusiast rather than full having full service history. Why? Well, some dealerships don't seem to know their arse from their elbow.

Twice now I've taken the S2 to an Audi dealership and have been told that they've never made an S2 and I must mean the A2 FSi. rolleyes

Maybe some cars are just screwed together better than others regardless of marques? If that is the case then I've certainly been lucky over the years. smile


icepop

1,177 posts

208 months

Sunday 24th April 2011
quotequote all
Robatr0n said:
Perhaps!

But we have to remember that buying second hand is always an unknown quantity. As it happens, I'd rather have a car that has been owned by an enthusiast rather than full having full service history. Why? Well, some dealerships don't seem to know their arse from their elbow.

Twice now I've taken the S2 to an Audi dealership and have been told that they've never made an S2 and I must mean the A2 FSi. rolleyes

Maybe some cars are just screwed together better than others regardless of marques? If that is the case then I've certainly been lucky over the years. smile

That is amazing, you should ask, as the car does not exsist, that it's serviced for free.

ex vtskid

347 posts

177 months

Sunday 24th April 2011
quotequote all
I had a 181k mile 2001 330i and it felt tight and ran well. Fair enough I only had it for 6 months but when I looked at the (extensive) service history there weren't any eye-popping bills - it was still on the original clutch for instance. You could tell it wasn't new but was more than good enough for a daily.

parapaul

2,828 posts

199 months

Sunday 24th April 2011
quotequote all
Just have done smile 2007 330d with 82k on it. Fully serviced, obviously maintained, and drives like the 4 year old car it is, not the 80k car it could be.

Kiltox

14,621 posts

159 months

Sunday 24th April 2011
quotequote all
parapaul said:
Just have done smile 2007 330d with 82k on it. Fully serviced, obviously maintained, and drives like the 4 year old car it is, not the 80k car it could be.
It's hardly high mileage for a diesel BMW anyway is it? Seen ex fleet examples well into 150k miles at that age biggrin

Enjoy it spin

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

205 months

Sunday 24th April 2011
quotequote all
Acheron said:
hornetrider said:
Your fuel bill is killing you but you're spending 10k on a new car? silly
Well, the part ex value obviously comes into it. Im fed up of constantly filling up, im doing more miles now, and im a bit fed up of the mondeo.
Sounds good only losing a few grand a year in depreciation but saving £500 a year on fuel