RE: SOTW: Rover 216 Vitesse EFI

RE: SOTW: Rover 216 Vitesse EFI

Author
Discussion

Goodfella 555

199 posts

169 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
DS3R said:
He fishtailed for about 200 yds before slamming in to the central reservation... Tortoise & hare!?
Excellent. It reminds me of a time when i was a small fella and a 2.8 Capri tried to race my dad in his E28 528i, i saw in the mirror smoke pouring out of the ford and it retiring to the hard shoulder, we felt a bit sorry for him for about half a second then both burst out laughing...

6potdave

2,310 posts

214 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
Funnily enough saw one of these the other day in really good condition. Had me reminiscing back to the 80's when I was driven to school in one by a friends mum a few times.

Would never buy one, they look like 3 various sized TV boxes stuck together and painted, but for someone who likes them what a cracking buy!

RPastry

357 posts

191 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
like it! quality leftfield shedding. nice to see anything that old in such good nick. couple more years and it'll be a proper cool retro ride as the 40mph everywhere bunch have long since moved on.

davidjpowell

17,841 posts

185 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
My dad had bought one of these in the early 90's to do up - it was in a bit of a state (rot).

I remember changing all four doors. He took it to a garage for an exhaust, who pointed out the whole underneath was rotten. Next trip was to the breakers, who were confused by the good condition of the doors compared to the rest of the car, along with the fact that they were a different colour...

turboman786

1,067 posts

188 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
Got to be one of the worst cars ever.... 2nd perhaps to its sibling the mighty Maestro....

Gizmo!

18,150 posts

210 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
Anyone slagging these off clearly hasn't driven one. Compared to the Mk3 Escort/Orion and the contemporary Astra/Belmont they were quiet, comfortable, and reliable - and the gearshift is exactly what you'd expect from a Honda too, very good indeed.

I put 20,000 miles on my 213 without anything other than normal servicing and a new ICV (I remember being quite disturbed when it started revving its tits off as soon as I started it up!).

And look how much space there is on that back seat. Ahhh, memories. biggrin

Justayellowbadge

37,057 posts

243 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
It will surprise no one that I had one of these.

Far nicer than contempory Escorts and the like.

billzeebub

3,864 posts

200 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
'Richard'.....very Hyacinth Bucket..bet the cars in such good condition cos the fella who owned it was out fettling & polishing it every day to get away from the Trouble!..

Balmoral Green

40,939 posts

249 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
turboman786 said:
Got to be one of the worst cars ever.... 2nd perhaps to its sibling the mighty Maestro....
hehe Obvious troll is, well, obvious.










As well as being factually incorrect.

B'stard Child

28,441 posts

247 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
My Dad had one of the 216 VDP ones brand new in 1987 (E plate in burgundy and grey leather trim) as a company car - 3 years and 60,000 mile later he handed it back with the original tyres and brakes still not worn out........... (this may reveal a lot about his driving style rather than long life tyres and brakes - you wouldn't want to be caught behind him on a single track road)

Never missed a beat, nothing fell off - everything worked from day one to day 1095 - must have been a Wednesday car.

Ferried the family and all Dad's boating tat around in a nice comfortable (if a smidge wallowy) fashion - and funnily enough was the first car he got since a Rover P6 from a long while back that treated our backsides to leather rather than vinyl, cloth or velour.

Great find - hope someone gets it and looks after it for another 25 years so there can at least be one left

Podie

46,630 posts

276 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
B'stard Child said:
My Dad had one of the 216 VDP ones brand new in 1987 (E plate in burgundy and grey leather trim) as a company car - 3 years and 60,000 mile later he handed it back with the original tyres and brakes still not worn out........... (this may reveal a lot about his driving style rather than long life tyres and brakes - you wouldn't want to be caught behind him on a single track road)

Never missed a beat, nothing fell off - everything worked from day one to day 1095 - must have been a Wednesday car.

Ferried the family and all Dad's boating tat around in a nice comfortable (if a smidge wallowy) fashion - and funnily enough was the first car he got since a Rover P6 from a long while back that treated our backsides to leather rather than vinyl, cloth or velour.

Great find - hope someone gets it and looks after it for another 25 years so there can at least be one left
My old man had one as a company car too. E-reg, black 216 SE!

Again, never missed a beat and nothing fell off. Worked faultlessly until the point the company replaced it with a Peugeot 605.

hairyblokedude

4 posts

179 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
Hmmm...anyone remember the 80's tv 'sitcom' Keeping up Appearances..?..Very Hyacinth Bucket...lol...urgh..I remember these new having worked at a Leyland dealer, the Vitesse badge promised much, but failed to deliver..But then it was a Honda. Trilby and tarten picnic blanket optional extras?

Cheers Alfarich156

dbdb

4,326 posts

174 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
Balmoral Green said:
turboman786 said:
Got to be one of the worst cars ever.... 2nd perhaps to its sibling the mighty Maestro....
hehe Obvious troll is, well, obvious.










As well as being factually incorrect.
So true on both counts... hehe

I remember these as being well regarded in their day - comfortable, fast and well put together. They were seen as very luxurious cars for the money and were much better than any of their opposition inside.

This particular car is one for an enthusiast rather than a run-of-the-mill punter, and is priced accordingly.

BigBen

11,648 posts

231 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
hairyblokedude said:
Hmmm...anyone remember the 80's tv 'sitcom' Keeping up Appearances..?..Very Hyacinth Bucket...lol...urgh..I remember these new having worked at a Leyland dealer, the Vitesse badge promised much, but failed to deliver..But then it was a Honda. Trilby and tarten picnic blanket optional extras?

Cheers Alfarich156
I think you are the only one or several others would surely have mentioned it earlier in the thread.

Bobdenero

187 posts

196 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
Why would you buy this, when as demonstrated week after week there is a huge choice of interesting and desirable cars on offer for your £1000

IOM Q

45 posts

166 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
I'd love this and would happily pay £900 for it but the lack of rear seatbelts would mean that fitting the baby seat might be a bit of a problem!

Mark-C

5,138 posts

206 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
Liking this as a shed choice - not my cup of tea but definitely out of the left field. Would make someone a great first car instead of the usual Saxo\106\whatever.

Martin 480 Turbo

602 posts

188 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
What a great find! The dad of my british pen pal (long before the net)
used to have one in that colour, but it was a 213 as a company car.
That one let him down a lot, due to the carburettor, which were among
the sole british parts on that jap car, as he pointed out.

The 216 were much better balanced in engine and suspension terms and
this particular car is a prime example (the only one?) and a great SOTW.

At least for me.

Martin 480 Turb

Goodfella 555

199 posts

169 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
(i was being a chicken and waiting for someone else to do it but they haven't);

i owned an Orion Ghia 1.6i and it was a really good car, far better than a Rover 216 so much so i'm surprised they are even being compared. It was much better built, had a cracking engine, a computer, rear headrests (a real luxury in those days), fantastic pepperpot alloys and a snazzy red line around the bumper (iirc). It used to suffer terrible lift at the front at speeds over 110 which had a bad impact on the steering (and general look of the car i'd imagine!) but it was a good car which could carry 7 fellas (two in the large boot) at high speeds with minimal risk of breakdowns, in fact it never let me down once. At the time it had a better image than an XR2 or XR3i too.

shoot




MarJay

2,173 posts

176 months

Friday 6th May 2011
quotequote all
mnkiboy said:
Finding it hard to get excited about this weeks SOTW. It just shouts 'Richard Bucket' at me.
My Great Aunt and Uncle were exactly like Hyacinth and Richard Bucket from Keeping Up Appearances. Right down to the Rover 216... although it was a "Sprint" special edition rather than a "Vitesse". My Aunt even wore those awful floral dresses that Mrs Bucket wore...

On this basis this shed is a complete FAIL. Come on PH, you can do better! Next you'll be shedding with a Daewoo Matiz auto... rolleyes