996 GT3 FS

Author
Discussion

Singh911

956 posts

242 months

Wednesday 8th April 2015
quotequote all
Question is, where is the cross over point? - six figures?

But what could/would replace it for sensible money? Nothing as far as i can see. Nothing that offers such character, speed and heritage in one bullet proof package.


LaSource

2,622 posts

209 months

Wednesday 8th April 2015
quotequote all
Singh911 said:
Question is, where is the cross over point? - six figures?

But what could/would replace it for sensible money? Nothing as far as i can see. Nothing that offers such character, speed and heritage in one bullet proof package.
My guess is even before that. If they get into 80s say then the future trajectory is even clearer...so many will want to store away their future potential £.
...it could make track usage a guilty pleasure for most.

...I know, it's sad to write this when most of us like to think that driving pleasure comes first before values. However, in the real world people have various financial priorities and needs and therefore it will happen.

I was at the ring last week and a few people commented on why I was using a 996 GT3 on track...likewise a number of 997.2 RS owners were also beginning to feel sensitive to using their rising cars on track.

I for one do not necessarily like the idea of the GT3 cars rising so much. It increases insurance excesses on track, cost of additional cover, reduces lap times, etc

Harris_I

3,228 posts

260 months

Wednesday 8th April 2015
quotequote all
LaSource said:
I for one do not necessarily like the idea of the GT3 cars rising so much. It increases insurance excesses on track, cost of additional cover, reduces lap times, etc
Amen to that. There's nothing like a potential 5 to 6 figure bill in the back of your mind to prevent you taking that tightening radius off camber high speed corner less than flat out...

Here's hoping prices (across the board) fall dramatically soon.

ClarkPB

818 posts

201 months

Wednesday 8th April 2015
quotequote all
A Guards Red 996.2 Club Sport that I know of with 20k miles sold for £65k privately last week.

Edited by ClarkPB on Wednesday 8th April 19:16

Scooty100

1,469 posts

117 months

Wednesday 8th April 2015
quotequote all
ClarkPB said:
A Guards Red 996.2 Club Sport that I know of with 20k miles sold for £65k privately last week.

Edited by ClarkPB on Wednesday 8th April 19:16
I find this v interesting sadly. had been thinking of selling my 997.1 CS 18.5K miles. Maybe I should keep it??

EricNL

5 posts

109 months

Wednesday 8th April 2015
quotequote all
Cheburator mk2 said:
If it sells, it makes my Fully Manthey-ed/Manthey owned 28k miles LHD CS worth what???
40K. Max. In euro's. And only when it comes with all the original parts.






biggrin




















mischaRS

83 posts

125 months

Wednesday 8th April 2015
quotequote all
Every year, in many differing posts, we complain abour car prices rising, in effect saying its b*llocks/ unfair/ scam etc etc... !!

It happens with Ferraris, Astons, AMG's. McLarens and certain Porsche models

Every week, every year !!

The Dealers get togethetr and yank up the prices

That is why they make money, and we gain by owning one of the lucky few !!!

99% of cars lose money every fricking minute !!!

We gain !!!!!!!

Cheburator mk2

2,996 posts

200 months

Wednesday 8th April 2015
quotequote all
EricNL said:
40K. Max. In euro's. And only when it comes with all the original parts.






biggrin


















If only you had included a packet of dry roasted or perhaps Cool Original Doritos, you may have had a deal here biggrin

boxsey

3,575 posts

211 months

Thursday 9th April 2015
quotequote all
LaSource said:
I for one do not necessarily like the idea of the GT3 cars rising so much. It increases insurance excesses on track, cost of additional cover, reduces lap times, etc
and you have to consider that as the values rise higher and higher the cars become economical to repair in the event of a big off on track i.e. the insurers are no longer going to write it off and give out a cheque for the insured value when it's going to cost less to repair it. It's for this reason that a number of friends have retired their RS/GT cars from track duty and have set about building 996 track cars to use instead.

DiscoColin

3,328 posts

215 months

Thursday 9th April 2015
quotequote all
boxsey said:
LaSource said:
I for one do not necessarily like the idea of the GT3 cars rising so much. It increases insurance excesses on track, cost of additional cover, reduces lap times, etc
and you have to consider that as the values rise higher and higher the cars become economical to repair in the event of a big off on track i.e. the insurers are no longer going to write it off and give out a cheque for the insured value when it's going to cost less to repair it. It's for this reason that a number of friends have retired their RS/GT cars from track duty and have set about building 996 track cars to use instead.
Personally I think that the greater problem isn't what they will repair, but more that the nature of spiralling prices is indicative of it being very difficult to replace a car. I wrote off my first GT3 on track almost 4 years ago, but at the time I had an open choice on the market of any GT3 to replace it. All slowly depreciating, there was a choice on the market of any model (from 996 comforts all the way up to 4 litre 997 RSs) and replacement was just a matter of whether you wanted the same again or to kick in some money for a more recent one. Now - you are kind of screwed if you break it. In the event of a total loss now you are almost at the point where even with a car fully paid out you might still not be able to actually source a decent replacement anyway.

Then there is the excess. I was much happier with the situation 4 years ago than I am now. Part of what will drive them off of the circuits is that with the excess typically being 10% of the car in an on track claim - the risk exposure is getting pretty serious now. With a 996 you are now into about £7k of damage before an insurance company puts anything in (thus an accident will be significant before the possibility of a claim is even on the table). RS drivers are already at the point where they could write off an early Cayman and walk away, yet be less out of pocket than an accident in their car (despite having to pay £200-£500 per day on top of their usual insurance if at a track day in Europe).

When cars hit 6 figures and you are on the hook for £10k+ in the event of a talent shortfall (or indeed - being hit by an over-zealous overseas driver who didn't pay attention in the briefing or arrive at a corner unexpectedly covered in hail), trust me : you start considering cheaper cars to track. The irony is that until last year, the 996 GT3 was a viable place to go to for that from the newer and more expensive flavours of pork. Now, it really isn't.

Edited by DiscoColin on Thursday 9th April 17:44

squirejo

794 posts

244 months

Thursday 9th April 2015
quotequote all
Sorry don't get it. Insurance value is up to date, excess is a fixed amount = drive car as see fit. I don't have plastic over my carpet or not live in my house cod it's worth a lot more. Anyone at Brands on 28th April?

keep it lit

3,388 posts

168 months

Thursday 9th April 2015
quotequote all
squirejo said:
Sorry don't get it. Insurance value is up to date, excess is a fixed amount = drive car as see fit. I don't have plastic over my carpet or not live in my house cod it's worth a lot more. Anyone at Brands on 28th April?
Would love to but I'm at Oulton park on that tuesday...


smile

Cheburator mk2

2,996 posts

200 months

Friday 10th April 2015
quotequote all
squirejo said:
Sorry don't get it. Insurance value is up to date, excess is a fixed amount = drive car as see fit. I don't have plastic over my carpet or not live in my house cod it's worth a lot more. Anyone at Brands on 28th April?
Would love to, but at the Ring with Circuit Days on the Monday... Brands is my local track - 15mins door to door...

rallyeman

540 posts

176 months

Friday 10th April 2015
quotequote all
Cheburator mk2 said:
squirejo said:
Sorry don't get it. Insurance value is up to date, excess is a fixed amount = drive car as see fit. I don't have plastic over my carpet or not live in my house cod it's worth a lot more. Anyone at Brands on 28th April?
Would love to, but at the Ring with Circuit Days on the Monday... Brands is my local track - 15mins door to door...
Would love to do Brands GP, but won't pass the 101db noise level frown

LaSource

2,622 posts

209 months

Friday 10th April 2015
quotequote all
rallyeman said:
Would love to do Brands GP, but won't pass the 101db noise level frown
Maybe that's driveby?

jackwood

2,617 posts

209 months

Friday 10th April 2015
quotequote all
rallyeman said:
Would love to do Brands GP, but won't pass the 101db noise level frown
Stock exhaust? You should be fine. I've got on there before. MSV locations do seems to understand that the static on a GT3 is always high and that most (with stock exhaust) are fine once on track and tested on drive-by.

squirejo

794 posts

244 months

Friday 10th April 2015
quotequote all
it's 102 db and my car will pass that

siheb

149 posts

186 months

Friday 10th April 2015
quotequote all
Mine failed a 105db static at Brands with a stock exhaust. But they let me on and it was fine all day.

Since then I've had a Hayward & Scott 1 1/4" bypass fitted and haven't bothered going back as it would be a certain no.

rallyeman

540 posts

176 months

Friday 10th April 2015
quotequote all
jackwood said:
rallyeman said:
Would love to do Brands GP, but won't pass the 101db noise level frown
Stock exhaust? You should be fine. I've got on there before. MSV locations do seems to understand that the static on a GT3 is always high and that most (with stock exhaust) are fine once on track and tested on drive-by.
My stock exhaust failed Bedford. Now I have 100 cel cats

DiscoColin

3,328 posts

215 months

Friday 10th April 2015
quotequote all
squirejo said:
Sorry don't get it. Insurance value is up to date, excess is a fixed amount = drive car as see fit.
Excess is a fixed amount for road use, but not for on track coverage. When used on circuits with insurance policies which extend cover to non-competitive circuit use (which to be direct: most policies don't anyway), the insurance excess applied is increased to 10% of the value of the car (depending upon the insurer this can be plus the normal road excess as well). So as the value of the car increases, the on-track excess increases accordingly (while the road excess stays constant). So for a £100k car, if you have an accident on the road your excess may be around £500. However if you crashed on a track day your excess would be £10k (or £10500 with some providers). When 996 GT3s could be had for £40k, the worst case scenario for an accident on track was £4k. It isn't any more.

As a footnote - most cars are actually insured for market value, thus religiously telling your insurer to amend it is not necessary - if you prang it then a loss assessor will appraise it there and then and if you disagree you will have to argue it out with them against market examples. It is only worth updating the insurance value if you have an agreed value policy.

Does that better explain it for you?