996 c4s is this best value Porsche out there right now

996 c4s is this best value Porsche out there right now

Author
Discussion

ktlcyprus

Original Poster:

44 posts

118 months

Saturday 19th July 2014
quotequote all
LordHaveMurci said:
ktlcyprus said:
Gotta b one of best value Porsches though totally agree.
And that is the title of the thread, not 'the C4S is the best looking'.
Yeah but I know what title is but it's not good value if u don't like the look of the car is it ..You need the package..

ktlcyprus

Original Poster:

44 posts

118 months

Saturday 19th July 2014
quotequote all
This thread stupid now everyone just says there car is best which is fair enough cause that's reason they bought it,just makes for a silly debate.il change title to everyone say why there car is best.. Lol

ktlcyprus

Original Poster:

44 posts

118 months

Saturday 19th July 2014
quotequote all
Mario149 said:
My 2p:

If you value looks a lot, 6C4S is probably the best value
If you value driving/performance, a plain jane (as a prev poster put it) 6C2 is the way to go.
Looks and performance combined? I'd throw in a 6C2 with the GT3 aero kit - the pre face lift cars especially look awesome with it IMO. My mate has one, probably worth say £12k on a good day with its 90k miles, drives beautifully, looks fab and with a €400 Carnewal exhaust, also sounds the dogs danglies. If he ever chops it in for a DB9 like he's threatening to do, I'm tempted to have it off him on principle!

ktlcyprus

Original Poster:

44 posts

118 months

Saturday 19th July 2014
quotequote all
Mario149 said:
My 2p:

If you value looks a lot, 6C4S is probably the best value
If you value driving/performance, a plain jane (as a prev poster put it) 6C2 is the way to go.
Looks and performance combined? I'd throw in a 6C2 with the GT3 aero kit - the pre face lift cars especially look awesome with it IMO. My mate has one, probably worth say £12k on a good day with its 90k miles, drives beautifully, looks fab and with a €400 Carnewal exhaust, also sounds the dogs danglies. If he ever chops it in for a DB9 like he's threatening to do, I'm tempted to have it off him on principle!
No way a pre face lift one,come on..

ktlcyprus

Original Poster:

44 posts

118 months

Saturday 19th July 2014
quotequote all
ktlcyprus said:
Mario149 said:
My 2p:

If you value looks a lot, 6C4S is probably the best value
If you value driving/performance, a plain jane (as a prev poster put it) 6C2 is the way to go.
Looks and performance combined? I'd throw in a 6C2 with the GT3 aero kit - the pre face lift cars especially look awesome with it IMO. My mate has one, probably worth say £12k on a good day with its 90k miles, drives beautifully, looks fab and with a €400 Carnewal exhaust, also sounds the dogs danglies. If he ever chops it in for a DB9 like he's threatening to do, I'm tempted to have it off him on principle!
No way a pre face lift one,come on..
The face lift c2 is good shout but not pre face lift

ktlcyprus

Original Poster:

44 posts

118 months

Saturday 19th July 2014
quotequote all
monthefish said:
ktlcyprus said:
ktlcyprus said:
Mario149 said:
My 2p:

If you value looks a lot, 6C4S is probably the best value
If you value driving/performance, a plain jane (as a prev poster put it) 6C2 is the way to go.
Looks and performance combined? I'd throw in a 6C2 with the GT3 aero kit - the pre face lift cars especially look awesome with it IMO. My mate has one, probably worth say £12k on a good day with its 90k miles, drives beautifully, looks fab and with a €400 Carnewal exhaust, also sounds the dogs danglies. If he ever chops it in for a DB9 like he's threatening to do, I'm tempted to have it off him on principle!
No way a pre face lift one,come on..
The face lift c2 is good shout but not pre face lift
As the man says, a 6C2 with aerokit looks awesome.

cloud9
What ever floats your boat guys. We all like different st ...

ktlcyprus

Original Poster:

44 posts

118 months

Saturday 19th July 2014
quotequote all
Mario149 said:
ktlcyprus said:
monthefish said:
ktlcyprus said:
ktlcyprus said:
Mario149 said:
My 2p:

If you value looks a lot, 6C4S is probably the best value
If you value driving/performance, a plain jane (as a prev poster put it) 6C2 is the way to go.
Looks and performance combined? I'd throw in a 6C2 with the GT3 aero kit - the pre face lift cars especially look awesome with it IMO. My mate has one, probably worth say £12k on a good day with its 90k miles, drives beautifully, looks fab and with a €400 Carnewal exhaust, also sounds the dogs danglies. If he ever chops it in for a DB9 like he's threatening to do, I'm tempted to have it off him on principle!
No way a pre face lift one,come on..
The face lift c2 is good shout but not pre face lift
As the man says, a 6C2 with aerokit looks awesome.

cloud9
What ever floats your boat guys. We all like different st ...
I think the pre face lift with aero kit works because it reminds you of the mk1 6GT3, and the mk2 6GT3 with the facelift lights just somehow doesn't look as good to my eye! Conversely, if we were talking regular C2, I think the facelift lights look better! Can't explain why!
Hmm..I def think face lift is better but that's just me,the shared boxster front end just ain't to my liking.A nice 997 C2 is fantastic value and still looks fresh id take that over 996 c2 .There isn't much dif in price as there yo be had around 15k mark

ktlcyprus

Original Poster:

44 posts

118 months

Sunday 20th July 2014
quotequote all
RatBoy M3CSL said:
..Have you tried to find a nice 4S recently..?, there aren't many out there for sale, specially in Seal Grey.. and the prices have firmed up significantly as with a lot of the older stuff..

Bought my 4S in April '11, expecting to change it in 12 months, and here I am 39 months later still enjoying it, they really are a go anywhere use every day car which is exactly why I bought it, nice but not too nice to leave in car parks, go shopping, leave outside the pub etc..

My recent coast runs are returning 29/30 mpg cruise on @ 80mph, still £280 to tax as it's pre March 2006. Is a turbo a better car is entirely subjective, faster yes, but the 4S isn't exactly slow once you get it up in the revs, it's just fine, and it sounds lovely too..

Depreciation is bugger all, I paid £25 for mine 3+ yrs ago, and the dealers are asking £22/23 today for an 04 car..
It's so true I love em,how bloody fast do you need it to go and besides when a car looks this good you wanna go to fast.One of the most sexy 911s ever in my opinion.. My seal grey one is amazing really the guy who services it reakons one of best examples he's seen.Turbo faster but that's it economy and looks kicks it's butt and there cheaper to buy to start with,that's without mentioning the sound of the thing wiith a sports exhaust..class

ktlcyprus

Original Poster:

44 posts

118 months

Sunday 20th July 2014
quotequote all
ktlcyprus said:
RatBoy M3CSL said:
..Have you tried to find a nice 4S recently..?, there aren't many out there for sale, specially in Seal Grey.. and the prices have firmed up significantly as with a lot of the older stuff..

Bought my 4S in April '11, expecting to change it in 12 months, and here I am 39 months later still enjoying it, they really are a go anywhere use every day car which is exactly why I bought it, nice but not too nice to leave in car parks, go shopping, leave outside the pub etc..

My recent coast runs are returning 29/30 mpg cruise on @ 80mph, still £280 to tax as it's pre March 2006. Is a turbo a better car is entirely subjective, faster yes, but the 4S isn't exactly slow once you get it up in the revs, it's just fine, and it sounds lovely too..

Depreciation is bugger all, I paid £25 for mine 3+ yrs ago, and the dealers are asking £22/23 today for an 04 car..
It's so true I love em,how bloody fast do you need it to go and besides when a car looks this good you wanna go to fast.One of the most sexy 911s ever in my opinion.. My seal grey one is amazing really the guy who services it reakons one of best examples he's seen.Turbo faster but that's it economy and looks kicks it's butt and there cheaper to buy to start with,that's without mentioning the sound of the thing wiith a sports exhaust..class
I meant you DONT wanna drive to fast on earlier paragraph..

ktlcyprus

Original Poster:

44 posts

118 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
RatBoy M3CSL said:
..Depreciation is next to bugger as far as I'm concerned, a couple of £K a year, compared to that of a newer car losing £10K a year, or £20K in the first year. It worries me not.., I bought it to drive everyday, which it's ideal for. I thoroughly recommend them as a great bang for your buck all rounder.

If you want a turbo, get one, but don't be surprised that your first service comes in @ £7-8K, with rads/turbo's/MAF/coil packs/boost leaks/clutch etc etc.. they can be hideously expensive for the ill advised or uninformed buyer.
Glad you said that iv had enough of people making out if you buy a turbo there bomb proof and ultra reliable..it's rubbish the more expensive a car to begin the bigger it's repAir bills..Some1 talking a bit of sense..

ktlcyprus

Original Poster:

44 posts

118 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
RatBoy M3CSL said:
..Depreciation is next to bugger as far as I'm concerned, a couple of £K a year, compared to that of a newer car losing £10K a year, or £20K in the first year. It worries me not.., I bought it to drive everyday, which it's ideal for. I thoroughly recommend them as a great bang for your buck all rounder.

If you want a turbo, get one, but don't be surprised that your first service comes in @ £7-8K, with rads/turbo's/MAF/coil packs/boost leaks/clutch etc etc.. they can be hideously expensive for the ill advised or uninformed buyer.
Glad you said that iv had enough of people making out if you buy a turbo there bomb proof and ultra reliable..it's rubbish the more expensive a car to begin the bigger it's repAir bills..Some1 talking a bit of sense..

ktlcyprus

Original Poster:

44 posts

118 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
vinnie83 said:
RatBoy M3CSL said:
If you want a turbo, get one, but don't be surprised that your first service comes in @ £7-8K, with rads/turbo's/MAF/coil packs/boost leaks/clutch etc etc.. they can be hideously expensive for the ill advised or uninformed buyer.

Edited by RatBoy M3CSL on Monday 21st July 22:33
I would be shocked to get a bill that big had I purchased with open eyes and a half decent inspection!

Rads - you can see quite easily if this is going to be an issue.

MAF and coil packs - cause misfires... why would you buy if these items are causing a poor running car?

Boost leaks - drive more than a couple and you will spot a car with a boost leak quickly... do the 996's have boost gauges? if so, you can see here. And a split hose is hardly thousands.

Clutch - how is this any more difficult to spot than on a C4S? They share the same AWD system in 996 guise no? (Someone will correct me if so)..... Not to mention the majority are tip...

Beware those that try to convince you that these cars cost many times over to run vs. the non turbo cars.. this is just not true... Yes, there are potential for bigger bills, but this is in the event of major failure... they don't cost THAT much more to run than the non turbo cars unless a major part fails.

Do your research, use the forums, get an inspection and you won't end up with a first service any more costly than the actual service!
This is the most expensive sounding conversation iv heard on this thread by a long shot..it's like turbo owners talk bout the worst scenarios on other models like there expected to happen but make out only small stuff can happen on there's ,nothing major hmm.. I

ktlcyprus

Original Poster:

44 posts

118 months

Monday 21st July 2014
quotequote all
Oh yeah and a 996 turbo in auto is even less point as the gap is even smaller in performance as it loses half a second..

ktlcyprus

Original Poster:

44 posts

118 months

Tuesday 22nd July 2014
quotequote all
monthefish said:
mollytherocker said:
ktlcyprus said:
Oh yeah and a 996 turbo in auto is even less point as the gap is even smaller in performance as it loses half a second..
Eh? You can get a Carrera auto too.
I think the newbie may be trolling. hehe

The turbo is the only 996 tiptronic I would consider as it has the power/torque to overcome the gearboxes shortcomings.
Hardly trolling is it just saying a manual carrera not much in it compared with auto turbo,if anything better and more involving cause the auto box takes away the performance gains..997 auto faster but 996 turbos no point in my eyes in auto form

ktlcyprus

Original Poster:

44 posts

118 months

Tuesday 22nd July 2014
quotequote all
vinnie83 said:
ktlcyprus said:
This is the most expensive sounding conversation iv heard on this thread by a long shot..it's like turbo owners talk bout the worst scenarios on other models like there expected to happen but make out only small stuff can happen on there's ,nothing major hmm.. I
I didn't mention at all about the worst scenarios on the other models, I stated that it's not true that a turbo is horrendously expensive vs. the non turbo models.

I haven't put down the C4s in this thread at all, so I don't get the defensive response... they're great cars, but I was responding to another post that the turbos cost a fortune to maintain, which isn't true.
Stop being a baby just saying all I hear is rms this ims that but you all make out nothing can go wrong with turbo which is nonsense as iv heard of some insane bills for them..

ktlcyprus

Original Poster:

44 posts

118 months

Tuesday 22nd July 2014
quotequote all
NJH said:
100% agreed on that. We had a 968 with a tip box and it kills it as a sports car compared to the sweet 6 speed manual. The big engined mercs also manage OK due to the massive grunt from those engines.
It's so true people on here going on about stats and zero to sixty times etc and they buy an auto..In the real world not when your down pub chatting with mates an auto is poo,fair enough PDK that's different but the older cars lose all the fun.I

ktlcyprus

Original Poster:

44 posts

118 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
vinnie83 said:
ktlcyprus said:
vinnie83 said:
ktlcyprus said:
This is the most expensive sounding conversation iv heard on this thread by a long shot..it's like turbo owners talk bout the worst scenarios on other models like there expected to happen but make out only small stuff can happen on there's ,nothing major hmm.. I
I didn't mention at all about the worst scenarios on the other models, I stated that it's not true that a turbo is horrendously expensive vs. the non turbo models.

I haven't put down the C4s in this thread at all, so I don't get the defensive response... they're great cars, but I was responding to another post that the turbos cost a fortune to maintain, which isn't true.
Stop being a baby just saying all I hear is rms this ims that but you all make out nothing can go wrong with turbo which is nonsense as iv heard of some insane bills for them..
Seriously, what are you on?

I don't see any turbo owners on here, let alone me, talking about RMS and IMS issues!

You clearly have a chip on your shoulder chap, I simply said the turbo isn't as costly as people make out - I never put your car down - in fact I said the C4s is a great car.

What exactly is your problem? Calm down chap, nobody here is trying to say there's anything wrong with your car nor is there any reason to throw insults.
Sorry didn't realise every1 was this sensitive on this forum..Can't b bothered and didn't want to wind any1 up just saying people talk rubbish on here,I'm bored with it

ktlcyprus

Original Poster:

44 posts

118 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
monthefish said:
Bye then.
wavey
Key board warrior