The 996 GT2 "Widowmaker" tag. Time to explode the myth.

The 996 GT2 "Widowmaker" tag. Time to explode the myth.

Author
Discussion

monthefish

20,443 posts

231 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
Slippydiff said:
monthefish said:
Slippydiff said:
You'll appreciate that both incidents had nothing to do with the car, both were "operator error".
Surely that's the point.

Even the most dangerous "widowmaker" car isn't actually going to kill anyone whilst parked up. Add in 'an operator' however...
Precisely my point, intrinsically they're not dangerous widowmakers, and driven by an "operator" with a modicum of care and common sense they're no no more dangerous than the equivalent horsepower 996 Turbo.
The last time this was discussed (or was it the time before, or the time before that perhaps?) I think it was generally agreed that the term widowmaker generally applies to how forgiving or not the car is, and how communicative the car is around the limit. The GT2 (mk1) was reputed to be unforgiving and uncommunicative at the limit, and was reported to have been improved for the mk2, and your own OP suggests that the cars are very sensitive chassis/suspension tweaking.


Fact or fiction? You decide...

"while some fans dismiss the GT2's reputation as the 'widow-maker', I personally know of three people who are no longer here because the 996 GT2 turned out to be way too much"


(911 & Porsche World, June 2008)


996GT2

2,649 posts

210 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
I also know of a fatal accident in a 996, driven by somebody who'd had a range of 911s over the years.

My experience of the 996 was that it was very easy to get along with providing you're not asking too much of it, if you push it it bites and it generally happens at big speeds. I did 25k in mine and drove it on the Nurburgring, Spa, Brands, Thruxton, Bedford - I ran factory geo for most of the time until towards the end of my ownership I had it setup by Parr, it seemed worse if anything. I span it at Spa coming out of the bus stop with too much right foot, stopped next to the barrier just in time, very lucky. I span it on Brands GP coming through Clearways, the front went light over the crest as I turned in and it swapped ends leaving me facing the wrong way on the pit lane - st scary.


I had a healthy level of respect for my 996 but it had none for me hehe



supermono

7,368 posts

248 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all


Owned this since April 2007 and can't really think of that GT2 sized space in the garage being filled with anything else, perhaps a 430 but these cars are just 911s to most people so get no attention anywhere. Try doing that with a Ferrari smile

Slippydiff

Original Poster:

14,830 posts

223 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
996GT2 said:
I did 25k in mine and drove it on the Nurburgring, Spa, Brands, Thruxton, Bedford - I ran factory geo for most of the time until towards the end of my ownership I had it setup by Parr, it seemed worse if anything. I span it at Spa coming out of the bus stop with too much right foot, stopped next to the barrier just in time, very lucky. I span it on Brands GP coming through Clearways, the front went light over the crest as I turned in and it swapped ends leaving me facing the wrong way on the pit lane - st scary.
Parr may have tweaked the geometry Gav, but they didn't adjust the ride heights and/or corner weights. Accordingly the car suffered from the usual 996 GT2 affliction, that being a saggy arse and no rake. Chucking big camber on the front and rear would only have exacerbated the handling issues. But worse still the rear dampers were toast (leaking and thus providing little in the way of damping) not surprising at 66k miles. I can't remember, but my guess is the tyres were probably past their best.

With the Ohlins fitted, the car was an awseome piece of kit, I suspect you'd have really enjoyed driving it on track with the mods I'd done.

996GT2

2,649 posts

210 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
Slippydiff said:
996GT2 said:
I did 25k in mine and drove it on the Nurburgring, Spa, Brands, Thruxton, Bedford - I ran factory geo for most of the time until towards the end of my ownership I had it setup by Parr, it seemed worse if anything. I span it at Spa coming out of the bus stop with too much right foot, stopped next to the barrier just in time, very lucky. I span it on Brands GP coming through Clearways, the front went light over the crest as I turned in and it swapped ends leaving me facing the wrong way on the pit lane - st scary.
Parr may have tweaked the geometry Gav, but they didn't adjust the ride heights and/or corner weights. Accordingly the car suffered from the usual 996 GT2 affliction, that being a saggy arse and no rake. Chucking big camber on the front and rear would only have exacerbated the handling issues. But worse still the rear dampers were toast (leaking and thus providing little in the way of damping) not surprising at 66k miles. I can't remember, but my guess is the tyres were probably past their best.

With the Ohlins fitted, the car was an awseome piece of kit, I suspect you'd have really enjoyed driving it on track with the mods I'd done.
I seem to remember they said they were adjusting the ride height as the adjusters were a real PITA to move. Whatever they did it didn't help much. In hindsight the dampers and everything else should have been replaced as they were no doubt the main issue, by the sounds of it you got the car properly sorted out, would have been great to drive it on that setup.


Don't suppose you know where the car is now do you? If it came up for sale I'd probably have it back again, third time lucky smile


PTT

664 posts

121 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all

Bought my car in April 2008, at first it was a scary car, losts of understeer and all over the place at high speeds. Had the geo done at Snel Motorsports and it changed the car, its on rails at high speeds (Over 330km/h at the Autobahn).
Still after all these years, every mile a smile.

WCZ

10,525 posts

194 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
I know of *my father actually knew them* 3-4 people in the uk who were killed by their 996 gt2's, one was an experienced driver

Slippydiff

Original Poster:

14,830 posts

223 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
996GT2 said:
I seem to remember they said they were adjusting the ride height as the adjusters were a real PITA to move. Whatever they did it didn't help much. In hindsight the dampers and everything else should have been replaced as they were no doubt the main issue, by the sounds of it you got the car properly sorted out, would have been great to drive it on that setup.


Don't suppose you know where the car is now do you? If it came up for sale I'd probably have it back again, third time lucky smile
I've just prepared a secondhand set of dampers for my GT3, it's boderline impossible to do on the car, and even off the car they're a complete PITA to free off (I ended up cutting the majority of spring seats and locking rings off, but managed to save the anti roll bar drop link brackets).
I'd be amazed if Parr removed the dampers do free them off, I'm equally doubtful they freed them off on the car, but without wishing to cast aspersions, my guess is the ride heights and cornerweights wouldn't have been adjusted ......



^ ...... the rear end is lower than the front in the above pic. It did look good though !
I know you weren't a massive fan of the ride height I ran the car at with the Ohlins on Gav, but it's ability to deal with compressions on the road at high speed (and undulating roads generally) was otherwordly. It was a truly an epic car.





Whilst searching through some paperwork yesterday, I found a copy of the original advert I'd printed off when I went to view the car. I really wish I hadn't sold it now frown

I dare say if you speak to Tom or Dan at 911V they might contact the present owner on your behalf.

996GT2

2,649 posts

210 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
Slippydiff said:
Damn I miss that car frown


She does look like she's riding a bit high in the other photo but if that's what it takes to make it work as a better road car then I could live with it.


If the current owner's reading this and wants to sell send me a PM.


hunter 66

3,905 posts

220 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
Original tag applied to the 993 GT2 ........ back in the days when 450 BHP was a lot ....... now F12 has 720 !! but many were boost modified ... so things happened.

SkinnyP

1,419 posts

149 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
I'm going to sound naive but do 996 GT2's have ESP?

unclepezza

789 posts

143 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
yes, your right foot and a LSD, thats all folks.

Xpuffin

9,209 posts

205 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
SkinnyP said:
I'm going to sound naive but do 996 GT2's have ESP?
No.

SkinnyP

1,419 posts

149 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
Xpuffin said:
SkinnyP said:
I'm going to sound naive but do 996 GT2's have ESP?
No.
It was nice knowing you folks.

Cheerio hehe

jackal

11,248 posts

282 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
Always loved the 96 GT2

From that magical epoch where you have modernity and extreme performance but it still feels bespoke and properly simple and racecar derived. Along with the 96 gt3s an end of an era IMO and one to keep IMO.

W1TAK

277 posts

219 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
I'm certainly keeping mine, but, from all the previous and current owners...what is the best suggested suspension set up? I know mine looks like its on original dampers and rusty springs, so i will need to update at some point, is there the ultimate set up ?

meteorgt2

81 posts

142 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
I owned one of these after just turning 24 in back in 2005, I was looking to get into a Turbo at the time until I saw one of these and just fell in love with the looks.

I drove it like an absolute loon and tuned it to over 600bhp, If you were sitting in the passenger seat when it hooked up in second gear it would almost make your vision go blurred.

With a decent suspension set up (cannot praise Chris at CG enough) and once you had found its limits I actually found it quite forgiving, although 100mph+ 4th gear rear end step outs were not uncommon in the rain, However I found you needed lightening fast reactions to really get the most from it.

The PCCB were toilet and these were binned after a couple of months as they pitted quite badly, The only other week spot I found was the gearbox, I think I had mine rebuilt three times in the time I had the car but that is evident in the way it was driven and the power put through it.

I kept this for over 4 years and over 50000 miles without accident and it was an awesome experience, I found it a lot more hard core that the 7GT2 I owned a couple of years after selling it.

supermono

7,368 posts

248 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Suspension wise I had mine serviced by Chris at CG and he removed the shocks for factory refurb plus changed a load of bushes etc and set it up at about 40k which made a world of difference to road manners, just felt so much more stable and predictable though I'm embarrassed to admit no track time at all...

supermono

7,368 posts

248 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Suspension wise I had mine serviced by Chris at CG and he removed the shocks for factory refurb plus changed a load of bushes etc and set it up at about 40k which made a world of difference to road manners, just felt so much more stable and predictable though I'm embarrassed to admit no track time at all...

jfp

514 posts

223 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
W1TAK said:
I'm certainly keeping mine, but, from all the previous and current owners...what is the best suggested suspension set up? I know mine looks like its on original dampers and rusty springs, so i will need to update at some point, is there the ultimate set up ?
I went from standard to Bilstein PSS9, then to the current exe-tc 3 way set up with progressive springs. Cost wise the jump from standard went £2,500 then £8,000 respectivy plus fitting. As slippy has already stated updated toe links and a rebush are also needed, plus of course a decent geo. Most would be more than happy with the PSS9, the exe-tc is a luxury but DOES perform superbly. Easy, relatively........