Adding turbo's to high cam lift engines

Adding turbo's to high cam lift engines

Author
Discussion

TotalControl

Original Poster:

8,056 posts

198 months

Thursday 4th February 2016
quotequote all
I'm not going to pretend I know a lot about the ins and outs but curiosity got the best of me.

Lets take 2 engines that are relatively the same. Say, for example, the Celica Gen 7 140 and 190 engines (1ZZ-FE & 2ZZ-GE if memory serves me). If one had to be chosen to turbo charge, which would be more effective? Also, which could be pushed further? Would the VVTLi in the 190 allow for the turbo to kick in and the lift after, or would the lift be made redundant?

Educate me.

Other examples of the same type of engine could be used by you guys who are a lot more knowledgeable as examples, but none spring to my mind right now.

TotalControl

Original Poster:

8,056 posts

198 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
I should have just kept this to myself. hehe

DrTre

12,955 posts

232 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
Better off posting in engines and drivetrains

DS197

992 posts

106 months

Friday 5th February 2016
quotequote all
Interesting question which I'm keen on knowing the answer for. Not sure if it's relevant but on the low boost conversion for the Clio 197, a reprofiled cam is used iirc

TotalControl

Original Poster:

8,056 posts

198 months

Saturday 6th February 2016
quotequote all
I posted here in the hope it would receive a wider audience. Not been in the other sub forum yet.

talksthetorque

10,815 posts

135 months

Saturday 6th February 2016
quotequote all
Not a turbo, but Toyota added a supercharger to a Corolla to create the compressor.
They used the 2ZZ-GE 190 engine.
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/t...

DrTre

12,955 posts

232 months

Saturday 6th February 2016
quotequote all
Not saying you won't get expert opinion here (MT seems to be knocking about right now) but the E&D place seems to be where a few hang out who tend not to venture in here IYSWIM.

rich85uk

3,367 posts

179 months

Saturday 6th February 2016
quotequote all
you will be better off searching in Type R forums, companies like TDI North offer a turbo and supercharger conversion for the Type R engine and its fairly popular. Its not something i have really looked into myself however judging from a few videos i have seen the engine behaves the same with VTEC/LIFT etc just with the benefit of much more low down power

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

246 months

Saturday 6th February 2016
quotequote all
Well, take a look at some supercharged Toyo-Lotuses and you should get the picture. So far as I'm aware the only car they turbocharged was the Esprit, which didn't have VVT.

rigga

8,730 posts

201 months

Saturday 6th February 2016
quotequote all
As far as I know lift isn't a limiting factor when turbochargers are added, as the idea is to get as much air as possible into what is effectively just a pump, but overlap where both the inlet and exhausts are open needs to be limited as obviously anything that goes in can be lost straight out again.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

246 months

Saturday 6th February 2016
quotequote all
^^^ Precisely. Hence if the engine goes "high lift" at the same time "boost" kicks in things will get rather lively. Modern electronics can help soften the transition but it still needs a sound mechanical basis.

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 6th February 2016
quotequote all
rigga said:
As far as I know lift isn't a limiting factor when turbochargers are added, as the idea is to get as much air as possible into what is effectively just a pump, but overlap where both the inlet and exhausts are open needs to be limited as obviously anything that goes in can be lost straight out again.
Correct, intake isn't important, in fact smaller is more emissions and idle friendly. However, exhaust lift and duration is important to expel the extra burnt gasses. You should also go for small or negative overlap.

Lower static compression works better generally as it enables a bigger window for tuning. Mine's 10:1 which is a bit high but only because I'm limited by the size of the supercharger that fits under the bonnet. Still manages over 800hp though which is enough.



aka_kerrly

12,418 posts

210 months

Saturday 6th February 2016
quotequote all
When it comes to turbo or supercharging an engine it's about selecting the right equipment for th engine.

In the Op's example you could use a turbo that makes boost later in the Rev range an continues making boost at the redline on the higher reving 2zz.than on the 1zz.

I've a friend with a CTR fitted with a rotrex c32 supercharger making >350hp. The charger compliments the vtec perfectly by making linear boost all the way to the >8500rpm rev limit.

Fitting a Turbo which makes max boost low in the Rev range an runs out of puff by 5000rpm is quite common on modern turbo cars to give good midrange , eg the kkk ko3 fitted to Vag cars. Simply swapping to a larger ko4 or Garret Gt /holset etc gives large gains an transforms the power delivery at the top end.


Edited by aka_kerrly on Saturday 6th February 20:38

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 6th February 2016
quotequote all
I think the only goal for a road car is a flat torque curve. That's why I like PD superchargers so much.

996TT02

3,308 posts

140 months

Saturday 6th February 2016
quotequote all
Dunno, but the 996 has variable valve lift AND turbocharging so neither are redundant.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

246 months

Saturday 6th February 2016
quotequote all
996TT02 said:
Dunno, but the 996 has variable valve lift AND turbocharging so neither are redundant.
Which brings us back to "electronic control". Unpopular with PH driving gods but who cares about them in their slow, old cars?