1983 SL 500 - Tempting?

Author
Discussion

55palfers

Original Poster:

5,909 posts

164 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all

TR4man

5,227 posts

174 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
Are you joking?

PositronicRay

27,012 posts

183 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
If you're going to all the effort of fitting "all new wheels" why fit wheels from the wrong model.

Sparky137

869 posts

181 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
Hmmm..... interesting MoT history. Not on the road between 2007 and 2015, and between that time it seems to have lost quite a lot of miles!!!

One to steer very clear of I think.

andyj007

303 posts

178 months

Friday 23rd September 2016
quotequote all
blooming heck milage out by 90K crooks!!

0a

23,901 posts

194 months

Friday 23rd September 2016
quotequote all
Why do the doors have carpet on them rather than leather?

Parisien

622 posts

162 months

Friday 23rd September 2016
quotequote all
No mentioned of £3k or is it £5k bulkhead repair being done either ....not so much a money pit but a money canyon!


P

Edited by Parisien on Saturday 24th September 09:06

gf15

987 posts

266 months

Saturday 24th September 2016
quotequote all
Wrong seats too!

captaindarling13

38 posts

168 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
The mileage on the .gov MOT checker can't be correct, it really can't have done 60k miles in a fortnight! Still had a bit of shave from the likely genuine 117k though.

Zonergem

1,368 posts

92 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
I'll say this for it - it's more tempting than 30k for a car with a bubbly O/S front wing! (Pic 3)

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2016...

or £125k each for fairly ordinary SLs attached to expensive numberplates

http://www.williamloughran.co.uk/current-stock/Mer...

duka

429 posts

220 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
where does the justification for £125k come from??