Considering New Boxster as only car - 4Cyl Refresh Options?

Considering New Boxster as only car - 4Cyl Refresh Options?

Author
Discussion

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

247 months

Wednesday 29th July 2015
quotequote all
I dare say the single turbo is all about cost to build/selling price at the bottom of the range. A flat 4 is already costlier than an inline 4 (which has far fewer parts and is easier to assemnble).

Same with the base Cayman going cheapest. No expensive convertible top and mechanism to build or install. Good strategy because a cheap base car makes it harder and harder for competitors to enter the game.

ORD

18,120 posts

128 months

Wednesday 29th July 2015
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
I dare say the single turbo is all about cost to build/selling price at the bottom of the range. A flat 4 is already costlier than an inline 4 (which has far fewer parts and is easier to assemnble).

Same with the base Cayman going cheapest. No expensive convertible top and mechanism to build or install. Good strategy because a cheap base car makes it harder and harder for competitors to enter the game.
Yep, unless it devalues the brand. Porsche makes huge margins on its cars - the badge carries a huge premium. I wouldn't risk that with a 4 cyl abomination.

In my view, it's all about emissions. Nothing else.

mollytherocker

14,366 posts

210 months

Wednesday 29th July 2015
quotequote all
They have been testing the 4C at one of the sites I work at. Part of a recall.

Bloody hell, what a ridiculous farty sound! How loud is it!

4's can sound good but all of the 'effort' seems to be towards the exhaust....

ORD

18,120 posts

128 months

Wednesday 29th July 2015
quotequote all
I would be surprised if those numbers are accurate.

I can't believe that the S will have less power than currently? Sure, it'll have more torque; but I doubt Porsche would carry out such a major change and not show an increase in power.

I doubt Porsche wants those headlines!

'4 Cylinder Turbo Porsches! As powerful as a Golf if you go for the S!'

Whether we like it or not, headline power figures matter, and Porsches are usually underpowered relative to similarly priced cars. If you go for turbos, there's no good reason (as regards marketing) not to increase the power and narrow the gap a bit.

(To be clear, I am not a power freak. 300bhp is plenty, and it's more about weight reduction for me smile )

bcr5784

7,120 posts

146 months

Wednesday 29th July 2015
quotequote all
ORD said:
I would be surprised if those numbers are accurate.

I can't believe that the S will have less power than currently? Sure, it'll have more torque; but I doubt Porsche would carry out such a major change and not show an increase in power.

I doubt Porsche wants those headlines!

'4 Cylinder Turbo Porsches! As powerful as a Golf if you go for the S!'

Whether we like it or not, headline power figures matter, and Porsches are usually underpowered relative to similarly priced cars. If you go for turbos, there's no good reason (as regards marketing) not to increase the power and narrow the gap a bit.

(To be clear, I am not a power freak. 300bhp is plenty, and it's more about weight reduction for me smile )
Have to agree - whatever your view of Turbo 4s such low figures don't seem to make marketing sense. (would be good for flat 6 residuals though...)

Krobar

Original Poster:

283 posts

108 months

Wednesday 29th July 2015
quotequote all
Looks like I will be getting a 6 Cylinder Cayman smile

Krobar

Original Poster:

283 posts

108 months

Sunday 9th August 2015
quotequote all
Finalised my spec yesterday, thanks for all the advice everyone. Will post some pics and maybe another question or 2 when the car finally arrives.