Is the 2.5 Boxster too risky and too slow a purchase?

Is the 2.5 Boxster too risky and too slow a purchase?

Author
Discussion

GreenArrow

Original Poster:

3,592 posts

117 months

Sunday 7th June 2015
quotequote all
ok, I may have the opportunity of buying a "toy" in the next 6-12 months and I have to express a soft spot for the original Boxster. I think (and this sounds crazy) its partly due to playing that Porsche challenge game on the playstation when they came out, I was 27 when the released it and along with the original Elise, its the one sports car I always said I would buy one day. I also think the original 2.5 looks very dainty and pure on its small wheels and it has that zingy revvy engine. However, two things bother me. 1) all the buying guides go on about the intermediate shaft bearing and the original 2.5 Boxster was the first oil cooled flat 6, I believe and 2) are they simply too slow in 2015?

I should qualify that second statement by saying that I own a bog standard 2 litre Mazda 6 and fiesta ST mk1 (with my wife) so even a 2.5 Boxster will feel quicker and that I am not particularly bothered by straight line grunt, my favourite cars have usually been those that felt the nimblest and sweetest to steer, rather than the outright fastest.

..thoughts?

GreenArrow

Original Poster:

3,592 posts

117 months

Monday 8th June 2015
quotequote all
Thanks for the replies. I saw what looked like a nice one on Autotrader with 70,000 miles and 2 owners I think, for £5995 and thought "what a lovely car, that surely will not go down in value".....

Off topic...3.4 Cayman S is another car that interests me, not now, but in 3 years time when I come into a bit of money....are they generally reliable?

wjb

5,100 posts

131 months

Monday 8th June 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Does what you said about the 2.5 apply to the 2.7 as well?

wjb

5,100 posts

131 months

Tuesday 9th June 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Cheers for the info, I'd written a boxster off my list due to the horror stories. Looks like you can get a lot of car for the money that 2.5's change hands at. It pays to be informed eh? smile

tr7v8

7,192 posts

228 months

Tuesday 9th June 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
But boring silver & no decent interior shots. Is the interior knackered?

tr7v8

7,192 posts

228 months

Tuesday 9th June 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
No not at all, when we were looking for ours didn't want black or silver. Arena or one of the metallic blues were on the list, possibly yellow or guards. Ours is actually Estoril blue a BMW colour which as a PTS option was £3500!
I would assume no interior pics means it is a mess, mine had no rips but was scratched & marked. Brooklands Kent have just reconnolised the whole interior & it now looks great.

GreenArrow

Original Poster:

3,592 posts

117 months

Tuesday 9th June 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Interesting, did you see the 35,000 miler in London, for £6000? I'd probably rather spend a bit more to secure a low mileage example as it wont be driven every day, so its more likely to appreciate in value in the future. I suspect early 2.5s will become quite sought after in time, as they look the most classic and are probably the most "pure".

GreenArrow

Original Poster:

3,592 posts

117 months

Wednesday 10th June 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201506084134414

I am not good with links...but its £6K and 35,000 miles.

Hugh74

83 posts

164 months

Saturday 13th June 2015
quotequote all
I've got a 2.7 Cayman (987.1) but now looking at 2.5 986's!

GreenArrow

Original Poster:

3,592 posts

117 months

Saturday 13th June 2015
quotequote all
..the more I look around the used car market, the more a Boxster makes sense. There are several sub 40,000 milers out there for £6K or less. You just cant pick up M3s, S2000s or Elise's (my other prospective purchases) for that money with those miles. In fact the Elise is right up for me, I have always wanted one, but even £10K doesn't seem to buy you anything with less than 70K on it.

Anyway, another question...is the 3.2 engined model one of the dodgy ones? My brother in law had a 987 3.2S between 2005-08 and I drove it and rated it very highly. Perhaps a bit too "smooth" for my tastes, but wanted to know if the 3.2 engine ( I assume its the same engine that is in the 986) is known for the aforementioned IMS or scoring problems.

Adam B

27,247 posts

254 months

Saturday 13th June 2015
quotequote all
RMS also, went on my 986 S, £800 bill to swap a £30 part

edc

9,235 posts

251 months

Saturday 13th June 2015
quotequote all
Adam B said:
RMS also, went on my 986 S, £800 bill to swap a £30 part
Where did you get that done? You can get a clutch and RMS for that sort of money and for a not much more a new IMS at the same time. Seems like you were short changed!

GreenArrow

Original Poster:

3,592 posts

117 months

Sunday 14th June 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Did a bit of research yesterday and the Honest John site says that bore scoring IS an issue on 986..in fact the list of potential problems is huge, much bigger than for the 987. Bit confused now! However, definitely all articles say the 3.4 engine has major issues!

BTW, could I have your opinion on the 1999 17,000 mile Boxster 2.5 for sale on this site...its in blue and Hampshire, which is local to me, for £7500. Is a really, really low mileage one actually a good idea? Some commentators say that cars which aren't driven regularly can be worse than some that are!

http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/p...

Edited by GreenArrow on Sunday 14th June 13:26

tr7v8

7,192 posts

228 months

Sunday 14th June 2015
quotequote all
GreenArrow said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Did a bit of research yesterday and the Honest John site says that bore scoring IS an issue on 986..in fact the list of potential problems is huge, much bigger than for the 987. Bit confused now! However, definitely all articles say the 3.4 engine has major issues!

BTW, could I have your opinion on the 1999 17,000 mile Boxster 2.5 for sale on this site...its in blue and Hampshire, which is local to me, for £7500. Is a really, really low mileage one actually a good idea? Some commentators say that cars which aren't driven regularly can be worse than some that are!

http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/p...

Edited by GreenArrow on Sunday 14th June 13:26
Not a great lover of low miles cars, they can be a pain with oil leaks & other issues. Is it on 1999 tyres? Concerned at his 2 year comment on servicing. They should really get a service every year. A car that has only done 1000ish miles a year will have issues.

edc

9,235 posts

251 months

Sunday 14th June 2015
quotequote all
Only the later 986 has a 2 year service interval.

tr7v8

7,192 posts

228 months

Sunday 14th June 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Simple lack of use, my 944 gave less issues when being used as my co. car doing 38K in 18 months than when it went on a classic policy & did 2k per year. Slow windows, poor running, sticky instruments, stuck on brakes.
1000 miles a year equates to 3 miles a day, unlikely to get warmed through & if living in surburbia then likely to be slow speed & not up to full temp either. So cold acid laden oil.

griffter

3,983 posts

255 months

Tuesday 16th June 2015
quotequote all
I'm a fan of low mileage cars too, but look at the wear on that steering wheel...

boxsey

3,574 posts

210 months

Tuesday 16th June 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
For your info we found bore scoring on my 2.7 986 (MY01). It was just coming up to 120,000 miles. Felt strong as an ox and wasn't using any significant amounts of oil between services. The only symptoms were that it was taking longer to fire up from cold. We then discovered oily plugs at a service so put a borescope in and found the scoring.

GreenArrow

Original Poster:

3,592 posts

117 months

Tuesday 16th June 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Fantastic! I am not actually ready to buy anything yet tbh...but I hope its a good 'un. I take on board your comments re the 986 and the Honest John site too....I must admit though, I am torn between Boxster/Elise and S2000. Had a business trip to Eastbourne yesterday, from my home near Bournemouth and saw several Boxsters and S2000s en route. Something very appealing about both those cars!

Beanoir

1,327 posts

195 months

Tuesday 16th June 2015
quotequote all
The S2000 becomes a chore as an everyday car too.