718 sound...

Author
Discussion

ORD

18,120 posts

128 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
Nope.
They didn't.

NJH

3,021 posts

210 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
Huskyman every turbo car I have been in or owned runs on a bit for a fraction of second, they have nothing like the responsiveness of good N/A engines. This was well known to those who used to race cars like the 944 turbo for example (951) that you really didn't want to be lifting once you had that peddle down, in fact I know a couple of people who have crashed off the road in road going 951s because they got the car a little out of shape and ended up fishtailing off as they couldn't synchronise power and steering.

DaveGB

1,670 posts

182 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
Seems Autocaar aren't fans of the noise http://youtu.be/kon9hlFts94

Rest of the package seems a good improvement however.

Edited by DaveGB on Monday 4th April 20:31

ORD

18,120 posts

128 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
Not sure about that. I like M Prior.

If you are watching his face and body language and listening to his tone, it's clear that he thinks the engine is terrible and largely ruins the car.

Mario149

7,758 posts

179 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
DaveGB said:
Seems Autocaar aren't fans of the noise http://youtu.be/kon9hlFts94

Rest of the package seems a good improvement however.

Edited by DaveGB on Monday 4th April 20:31
I think that's called damning with faint praise frown Never heard anyone talk about a car saying that it was still a class leader sound more depressed as they were delivering the words.

Think this might be the straw that broke the came's back. I think even the most die hard air-cooled fans eventually got on board with watercooling as while you lost some of the air cooled noise, you fundamentally got a better sportscar engine: higher revving, good sound if a bit different etc.

Arguably the 996.1 3.4 litre unit was the best non-Mezger one until the 997.2/991.1 ones - the former still needed revving hard to get the best with peak torque coming quite late like a 993 lump and the latter producing nicely over 100 bhp/litre. I'm just not sure there's any way to dress up a flat 4 turbo as a better sportcar engine than what came before it, even when we will have 10 years worth of hindsight frown

Mario149

7,758 posts

179 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
ORD said:
If you are watching his face and body language and listening to his tone, it's clear that he thinks the engine is terrible and largely ruins the car.
This^^. He's desperately trying to hide his disappointment. The words to camera say one thing, his tone of voice is screaming the opposite.

ORD

18,120 posts

128 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
It's a dogst engine from what I have seen and heard. Not materially better than an inline 4 in a fast turbo shopping car. A45 or whatever.

NJH

3,021 posts

210 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
I was just about to post that as well as the Autocar vid popped out in my Youtube stream. One of most luke warm new car presentations I can remember.

Also on the previous point about drifting and turbos well they prove my point. When driving fast on track the one thing we are trying not to do is drift the car under power as this is slow, you also need to keep a fairly surprising amount of power in to keep the rear wheels spinning which is why drift cars are huge power monsters, makes it much easier to drift at high speed.

What I and I think many others who care about these things want is the opposite, using your right foot to accurately control how much traction the car has is one of the greatest feelings you can have on 4 wheels. I haven't done it more than a handful of times in the dry but my god you feel like a super hero when you get it right, get a bit of angle on the car whilst still sling shooting out of the corner after carrying more speed in than you dare. Strange we sacrifice so much to get a few seconds of pure vehicular ecstasy but if not for that what else.

mollytherocker

14,366 posts

210 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
I am genuinely gutted watching that Autocar video.

He was really holding back and trying to be as subtle as possible. Trying to accept what had to happen. But it was clear. Its crap.

ags11

569 posts

141 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
I was just about to put a link to this up.
Depressing video to put it mildly, he couldn't hide the disappointment, it was palpable!
Can it still be the best drivers car with that engine?? I know handling/feedback is hugely important, but the engine has to be at least as relevant?

tyrrell

1,670 posts

209 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
Yes he says one thing, but the tone of his voice betrays what his heart is telling him it sounds dreadful frown

DJMC

3,438 posts

104 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
Auto Express seem to love it. No really!...

https://youtu.be/4vU7CncEUlg

ags11

569 posts

141 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
I wonder what the sound's like without the sports exhaust? I can't believe they charge for it now, you have to pay to make your car sound "less s**t".

cowboyengineer

1,411 posts

115 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
And then you compare it to this video!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=y1LhUzL3qdU

ags11

569 posts

141 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
cowboyengineer said:
And then you compare it to this video!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=y1LhUzL3qdU
Was thinking of this too....enuf said!

cowboyengineer

1,411 posts

115 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
And the video that made me buy a Cayman GTS

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2MkpTyMNV8E

mollytherocker

14,366 posts

210 months

Monday 4th April 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Come back Jeremy Clarkson?

Sustenpass

100 posts

98 months

Tuesday 5th April 2016
quotequote all
After reading many of the comments, watching the video I didn't find him nearly as weaselly as suggested; I think the PH audience can pretty easily translate when he uses words like "slightly" and "a little bit" to describe the loss of character, he actually means "a crapload."

There are barely any superlatives in the review, which is the norm for these first drive videos.

But the general Autocar audience may struggle to separate that from all the objective stats that have 'improved', and read it has him being bhy and unfair.

As he says, the car world is being forced to find efficiency by regulation, and it seems turbo is currently the easiest/cheapest path.

Longer term, I would hope that some sort of 918-style hybrid system could be implemented. Let's say a small flat six, with battery power for stop start traffic and motorway coasting. Limited or no intervention when pushing on. The combustion engine could be tuned to be quite top end focused in this scenario.

I guess the weight of the batteries is the elephant in the boot...

Edited by Sustenpass on Tuesday 5th April 04:03

Sustenpass

100 posts

98 months

Tuesday 5th April 2016
quotequote all
Having said all that, the Evo review also moans extensively about the engine, but it still rates 4.5 stars. To only penalise it half a star given what they have to say about it, is disappointing from Evo, who tell us they're about the thrill of driving. I guess declining readership is a factor.

What in a car could be more specifically thrilling than a great engine?

bcr5784

7,118 posts

146 months

Tuesday 5th April 2016
quotequote all
Sustenpass said:
What in a car could be more specifically thrilling than a great engine?
Great handling - and by a big margin in my view. Hence the appeal of Caterhams, Radicals et al.