30k budget? 987 cayman s, 981 boxster or A45 amg?

30k budget? 987 cayman s, 981 boxster or A45 amg?

Author
Discussion

DJMC

3,438 posts

103 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
JayK12 said:
Never driven a 987 but spent the last 3 years in gutted out, manual, simple track / race cars, so I know about driver involvement.......the the 981 wasn't involving to drive, i wouldn't be in one.... It could be more involving but your summary is incorrect imo.

I think you mean "IF the 981 wasn't involving to drive, I wouldn't be in one?

Me too. As an RAC competition license holder back in the day, I'm with you. wink

j8bbk

Original Poster:

95 posts

96 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
I think your being a little unfair on the 981. General consensus is it has some very minor shortfalls to make it an overall far superior car. Hope it's not just bling. driving one this weekend!

DavidJG said:
I think I'll just sum up the overall verdict so far:

If you want Bling, but a 981.

If you want driver involvement, buy a 987.

Guess it comes down to personal taste. I've driven a couple of 981s now, and I won't be getting rid of my 987. But then, Bling doesn't interest me.

Onedesi

91 posts

146 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
j8bbk said:
I think your being a little unfair on the 981. General consensus is it has some very minor shortfalls to make it an overall far superior car. Hope it's not just bling. driving one this weekend!

DavidJG said:
I think I'll just sum up the overall verdict so far:

If you want Bling, but a 981.

If you want driver involvement, buy a 987.

Guess it comes down to personal taste. I've driven a couple of 981s now, and I won't be getting rid of my 987. But then, Bling doesn't interest me.
I wouldn't worry I think you'll love the 981, the key thing that jumps out for me in this thread is that if you've not owned s boxster than whatever you drive will be awesome.

Differences between models are minor but because the ownership is so emotive the small things matter to owners.

Now I have a 987 I don't see the urge to get a 981 but if I had bought a 981 I couldn't see myself looking for a 987 if that makes sense.

Whatever you do as long as it grabs you it will be awesome!

HighwayStar

4,259 posts

144 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
j8bbk said:
I think your being a little unfair on the 981. General consensus is it has some very minor shortfalls to make it an overall far superior car. Hope it's not just bling. driving one this weekend!

DavidJG said:
I think I'll just sum up the overall verdict so far:

If you want Bling, but a 981.

If you want driver involvement, buy a 987.

Guess it comes down to personal taste. I've driven a couple of 981s now, and I won't be getting rid of my 987. But then, Bling doesn't interest me.
Compared to what you're driving already, I had a TTS, you've got an A1... you already know what bling is my friend. Yes the 981 is a nice place to be, some nice touches inside etc., but when it comes to the driving experience, you will notice a serious upgrade to what you current steed can serve up. I look forward to your thoughts after the drive.

j8bbk

Original Poster:

95 posts

96 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
I don't get the point that the 981 is just 'bling' though. I'm hoping its more than just cosmetic for the extra £10k outlay - hoping for some dynamic improvements. But at the same time interior finish is high on my list or I would be more keen on a Lotus. Yes, I'm aware what bling is.. but I wouldn't consider a hyper hatch with 4wd that looks like a cooking A1 just bling. If anything it doesn't look 30k worth - a TT is what I would consider 'bling'.


HighwayStar said:
Compared to what you're driving already, I had a TTS, you've got an A1... you already know what bling is my friend. Yes the 981 is a nice place to be, some nice touches inside etc., but when it comes to the driving experience, you will notice a serious upgrade to what you current steed can serve up. I look forward to your thoughts after the drive.
Edited by j8bbk on Friday 2nd September 12:37

HighwayStar

4,259 posts

144 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
j8bbk said:
I'm a little lost at what point your trying to make?

I don't get the point that the 981 is just 'bling'. I'm hoping its more than just that for the extra £10k outlay. But at the same time interior finish is high on my list or I would be more keen on a Lotus. Yes, I'm aware what bling is.. but I wouldn't consider a hyper hatch with 4wd that looks like a cooking A1 just bling. If anything it doesn't look 30k worth - a TT is what I would consider 'bling'.


HighwayStar said:
Compared to what you're driving already, I had a TTS, you've got an A1... you already know what bling is my friend. Yes the 981 is a nice place to be, some nice touches inside etc., but when it comes to the driving experience, you will notice a serious upgrade to what you current steed can serve up. I look forward to your thoughts after the drive.
ok... What I was trying to say is this. Audi do nice interiors, nice place to sit etc.. The generally consensus round these parts are Audi's are bling, nicely present but disconnected from the drive when it comes to the business of drive. Fast yes, but no feedback or involvement. No soul.

The 981 IMO looks great inside, well presented and certainly doesn't look cheap. So, as you've mentioned nice touches inside, it's all good. The Porsche has got that covered.

When you drive it though, that's when it will makes sense to you, even sitting on traffic that flat six adds drama, has a presence that no turbo 4 hot hatch is going serve up. When you press on, the noise is wonderful and the car works with you. You can feel it. Get it on some decent B roads if you can and you'll find out for yourself.

The 981 delivers on interior finish and driving experience.

DJMC

3,438 posts

103 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
In the same way all 911 drivers perhaps believe their chosen model is the best, for their own reasons, I think the same applies to the 986/987/981/718.

When I see a 987 Cayman I think "Oooh look, another Cayman" and not "Ah, poor sod, driving an old model."

They will all become classic cars for differing reasons perhaps but mainly because they're all a great looking, great driving, Porsche.

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

265 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
981 is better in every way ;-)


Bar enjoyment ;-)

DJMC

3,438 posts

103 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
Porsche911R said:
981 is better in every way ;-)


Bar enjoyment ;-)
I drove two 987.2 Caymans, and bought a 981 as the better, more "enjoyable" car.

You did the opposite perhaps? But... we're all different, with differing opinions, requirements, and driving "needs".

It's just down to personal likes and dislikes, as with food, travel, women...


j8bbk

Original Poster:

95 posts

96 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
Ahhh Gotcha... Thanks for explaining HighwayStar.

That 'specialness' is what I'm looking for. If the 981 provides the interior finish and the driving experience it has every box ticked for me. In which case its well worth the premium over a 987. Will report back after a drive!


HighwayStar said:
ok... What I was trying to say is this. Audi do nice interiors, nice place to sit etc.. The generally consensus round these parts are Audi's are bling, nicely present but disconnected from the drive when it comes to the business of drive. Fast yes, but no feedback or involvement. No soul.

The 981 IMO looks great inside, well presented and certainly doesn't look cheap. So, as you've mentioned nice touches inside, it's all good. The Porsche has got that covered.

When you drive it though, that's when it will makes sense to you, even sitting on traffic that flat six adds drama, has a presence that no turbo 4 hot hatch is going serve up. When you press on, the noise is wonderful and the car works with you. You can feel it. Get it on some decent B roads if you can and you'll find out for yourself.

The 981 delivers on interior finish and driving experience.

Klippie

3,153 posts

145 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
A minor one but important if interior quality is your thing....the 987 has better carpets...whistle

J-P

4,350 posts

206 months

Friday 2nd September 2016
quotequote all
I think you should try all the cars you're interested in and then decide.

I love my Cayman R but it wasn't always the case.

Also last year I had the opportunity to drive a base 981, a 981S and 981GTS back to back. I noticed a significant difference between the 3 - all lovely cars though. Got into the R at the end of the day and thought "I've definitely got the better car". No the interior doesn't match up to the 981 but the driving experience is better. I did like all of the 981s I drove, they are great cars but IMHO the 987 R is better.

chriscoates81

482 posts

132 months

Saturday 3rd September 2016
quotequote all
J-P said:
I think you should try all the cars you're interested in and then decide.

I love my Cayman R but it wasn't always the case.

Also last year I had the opportunity to drive a base 981, a 981S and 981GTS back to back. I noticed a significant difference between the 3 - all lovely cars though. Got into the R at the end of the day and thought "I've definitely got the better car". No the interior doesn't match up to the 981 but the driving experience is better. I did like all of the 981s I drove, they are great cars but IMHO the 987 R is better.
Surely the gas is the only one that would be comparable to an R anyway?

J-P

4,350 posts

206 months

Saturday 3rd September 2016
quotequote all
chriscoates81 said:
J-P said:
I think you should try all the cars you're interested in and then decide.

I love my Cayman R but it wasn't always the case.

Also last year I had the opportunity to drive a base 981, a 981S and 981GTS back to back. I noticed a significant difference between the 3 - all lovely cars though. Got into the R at the end of the day and thought "I've definitely got the better car". No the interior doesn't match up to the 981 but the driving experience is better. I did like all of the 981s I drove, they are great cars but IMHO the 987 R is better.
Surely the gas is the only one that would be comparable to an R anyway?
Yes the GTS was closest to the R. What I found most surprising about the 981 was that the base car, the S and the GTS were all quite different from each other. After driving the base car I thought "hmm, nice car, I can see why people like it. When I drove the S I thought "this is more like it, definitely prefer the way this drives over the base car" and in the GTS I thought "wow what have they done? This is a great bit of kit - love it". Then I left the PEC, got back in mine and thought "this is still better". No contrived exhaust noise, no thoughts of 'Audi' when I got in it just simple, honest fun.

chriscoates81

482 posts

132 months

Saturday 3rd September 2016
quotequote all
Glad your realised I meant gts stupid autocorrect on my phone. I drove a base boxster and thought it actually rode better than my 996 turbo. It only had 750 miles on it vs mine having 94000 but it seemed nicer, the pse was a nice change over the muted noise of my car.

gladiac

11 posts

91 months

Saturday 3rd September 2016
quotequote all
I ended up with a 987.2 Cayman S from similar budget/requirements. Also looked at 997.1 S (engine worries put me off) and Lotus Evora S - more of an event/experience to drive, interior quality not quite there, much rarer (both good and bad, if you like the exclusivity/attention but harder to find) and the best part of £10k more though will probably hold that value.

bingles

29 posts

132 months

Saturday 3rd September 2016
quotequote all
Lots of opinion of this subject - I thought I'd add mine! smile

My first Porker was a 987.1 Cayman S in Guards red. I bought it in 2009 and had a blast for nearly 18 months but I had the Neunelfer in my head... So I "invested" in a 997.1 C4S. It was incredible, but really expensive to drive - 6000miles on a set of shoes at £1.5k a time, 18mpg everywhere, servicing was astronomical. It was gone in 9 months. I lost £16k in that period in depreciation... laugh (I bought it for £45k and sold it for £29k) - I swore that I'd never get another porker again. So I went and bought a BMW 335d. That lasted for nearly 2 years and then I gave in and bought my current 987.2S Cayman Black Edition Manual. It really is great, such an analogue experience.
So, I've had it for nearly 3 years and recently I got the 981 bug. So 3 tests drives later I realise that the thing that I *think I want is the updated looks and the interior to match. It turned out those things are not that important to my driving experience. I had a 981S for the weekend a couple of weeks ago, and it left me a bit cold. Yes the looks are better, yes the tech is better, yes it's more refined...

But isn't that the whole thing with a sports car? Doesn't it need imperfections and feel? Shouldn't it be raw, exciting and a little unrefined? That's the reason that I'm keeping my Black Edition. It is raw, it is exciting, its definitely quick enough, and it's got all the kit I need. Yes I'd love a better Nav, I'd also like the updated looks/interior, but not at the expense of the analogue driving experience. Something, in my opinion, the 981 (and probably the 781) doesn't deliver.

Just my two cents... driving

HighwayStar

4,259 posts

144 months

Saturday 3rd September 2016
quotequote all
bingles said:
Lots of opinion of this subject - I thought I'd add mine! smile

My first Porker was a 987.1 Cayman S in Guards red. I bought it in 2009 and had a blast for nearly 18 months but I had the Neunelfer in my head... So I "invested" in a 997.1 C4S. It was incredible, but really expensive to drive - 6000miles on a set of shoes at £1.5k a time, 18mpg everywhere, servicing was astronomical. It was gone in 9 months. I lost £16k in that period in depreciation... laugh (I bought it for £45k and sold it for £29k) - I swore that I'd never get another porker again. So I went and bought a BMW 335d. That lasted for nearly 2 years and then I gave in and bought my current 987.2S Cayman Black Edition Manual. It really is great, such an analogue experience.
So, I've had it for nearly 3 years and recently I got the 981 bug. So 3 tests drives later I realise that the thing that I *think I want is the updated looks and the interior to match. It turned out those things are not that important to my driving experience. I had a 981S for the weekend a couple of weeks ago, and it left me a bit cold. Yes the looks are better, yes the tech is better, yes it's more refined...

But isn't that the whole thing with a sports car? Doesn't it need imperfections and feel? Shouldn't it be raw, exciting and a little unrefined? That's the reason that I'm keeping my Black Edition. It is raw, it is exciting, its definitely quick enough, and it's got all the kit I need. Yes I'd love a better Nav, I'd also like the updated looks/interior, but not at the expense of the analogue driving experience. Something, in my opinion, the 981 (and probably the 781) doesn't deliver.

Just my two cents... driving
I have a 981 CS but what you say makes sense. If I'd have driven the 987 I'd have likely felt the same way. I loved the idea of the 987 when it came out but it always looked a little awkward, not quite right IMO. The 981 nailed it for me but, not that I'm disappointed in anyway, I do sometimes wonder how much better it would be with 'proper' steering. My best mate has a Cayman R so I'll find out soon enough.

J-P

4,350 posts

206 months

Saturday 3rd September 2016
quotequote all
I've got used to the somewhat naff interior of the 987.2. Quite like it now, reminds me that I have it for the way it drives, not the interior.

HighwayStar

4,259 posts

144 months

Saturday 3rd September 2016
quotequote all
J-P said:
I've got used to the somewhat naff interior of the 987.2. Quite like it now, reminds me that I have it for the way it drives, not the interior.
Ooooh... Cheap shot wink. I doubt most on here, me included, have a 981 simply because of the interior. If that was the case I'd be in a MK3 TTS.