More hype and plain silliness
Discussion
355Chris355 said:
There are signs at this auction that the buyers were only willing to back the Blue Chip investment grade supercars.
Sensible buyers IMO. Having said that no matter how rare a GT2, GT3 RS or GT2 RS is I'd still have a Lambo or a Fezza over them any day. They're never £160k to £300k cars just no way based on the experience. They're just 911 after all.There was a point where it looked like a GT3 RS 4.0 was more than or equal to the value of Carrera GT. Thats just daft based on what they both actually are. May still happen mind in terms of certain 911's surpassing CGTs
anonymous said:
[redacted]
A 16V version of the 328 (The very slow version) was 4 years ago up for sale for ages for £16K. Now how much are they worth ...... yet some complain about prices of old vanilla 911s that would be twice as good and twice as quick.... our old 911s are rightly or wrongly just playing catch-up.
you`d be surprised how peppy alot of the ferraries are. Seen some very impressive dynos in relation to factory numbers...
You can slate the italians for many things, but the engines arent one of them in my experience.
Ferrari engines are great!
As old Enzo used to say. "You pay for the engine, the rest is for free"
You can slate the italians for many things, but the engines arent one of them in my experience.
Ferrari engines are great!
As old Enzo used to say. "You pay for the engine, the rest is for free"
Axel987 said:
you`d be surprised how peppy alot of the ferraries are. Seen some very impressive dynos in relation to factory numbers...
You can slate the italians for many things, but the engines arent one of them in my experience.
They need miles on them, (some say 20k before they're fully run in) A quick look will show that a fair percentage of cars on the market have less than that mileage despite being 10, 20 ,30 years old and having been polished to within an inch of their lives, when in reality they need thrashing to within an inch of their lives.You can slate the italians for many things, but the engines arent one of them in my experience.
IMIA said:
g7jhp said:
IMIA said:
Good spot!
Great looking car. Do you prefer your 964 to the 3.2 from a driving perspective?
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I find it amazing that people are trying to invest in certain cars at present because the ship has sailed on the true classics.It's a bit like the ripple effect and buying in an area a few miles from a prime location.
I think the E46 would be a better buy than the E36. Looks better IMO, well received, newer and has the CSL and CS as halo models.
Again it's all greed, buy cars to drive and enjoy - any upside is a bonus offset v running costs.
Edited by g7jhp on Saturday 4th April 08:31
P50 said:
IMIA said:
g7jhp said:
IMIA said:
Good spot!
Great looking car. Do you prefer your 964 to the 3.2 from a driving perspective?
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/p...
When this is £500k albeit very rare car etc I know the real deal 3.2C air-cooled experience is cheap by comparison at £80k and if someone knows anything about driving the better car. Also the long hoods are average to drive by comparison unless you have a 2.7 RS!
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/p...
Hexagon also have a few well priced 3.2C in guards. Ones a targa but the best of the lot condition.
I'm off for a morning drive in a mo in one of them with the kids!
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/p...
Well this has been for sale for well over a year.
Would suggest based on the silly prices at the moment, that in relative terms if you got it for 40k and based on the very low miles its a reasonable price. I certainly wouldn't pay an extra 20k to be sat on the right.
Well this has been for sale for well over a year.
Would suggest based on the silly prices at the moment, that in relative terms if you got it for 40k and based on the very low miles its a reasonable price. I certainly wouldn't pay an extra 20k to be sat on the right.
Gassing Station | Porsche Classics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff