Looking to buy a 430 in jan.

Looking to buy a 430 in jan.

Author
Discussion

Kyodo

728 posts

124 months

Tuesday 27th January 2015
quotequote all
Hi Aldous. I knew about that but how does it fare when cars have had the TCU upgraded or swapped, whether temporarily or permanent?
I know it's a case of getting it done properly so is it a case of having the tech transfer/re-program in the info from old to new etc… ?

Cerberaherts

1,651 posts

141 months

Tuesday 27th January 2015
quotequote all
If it's a used TCU you will have the previous vehicles distance-per-gear logged. If it's a new TCU it will read zero when fitted. You can also erase the mileage easily with an SD3 unit, or manipulate the mileage by another method but it's fairly easy to tell if the units been tampered with which gives the game away. You can also look deeper into the instrument cluster coding and if you know what to look for it is obvious if somebody has altered it. Many cars I see have mileage discrepancies, it is unfortunately very common.

roygarth

2,673 posts

248 months

Tuesday 27th January 2015
quotequote all
voicey said:
A PPI should include a scan of the TCU (assuming F1) - this will return the km traveled in each gear. Add them up, divide by 1.6 and the answer should match the odometer.

It is difficult to re-program these parameters in the TCU so they are a reliable check of mileage.
Precisely. Take these 'they're all clocked' claims with a very large pinch of salt.

roygarth

2,673 posts

248 months

Tuesday 27th January 2015
quotequote all
Cerberaherts said:
Many cars I see have mileage discrepancies, it is unfortunately very common.
Interesting. Could you be more precise?

Cerberaherts

1,651 posts

141 months

Wednesday 28th January 2015
quotequote all
roygarth said:
Interesting. Could you be more precise?
Certainly. Mostly, any anomalies are thrown up during a PPI, but there are instances where alterations are discovered incidentally during the course of a repair. For example, sometimes jump-starting can cause a voltage spike in the instrument pack, resulting in regional settings to be lost. The ensuing repair operation requires resetting the unit with diagnostic equipment. Part of the procedure accesses imformation regarding mileage, and discrepancies between this algarythm and the displayed mileage can be seen. Altering the mileage in the gearbox TCU is just a case of altering the check-sum of one of the IC's within the unit.It is, of course, impossible to know when any such alteration has taken place. It could be that the vehicle is an ex-rental car coming off fleet while still fairly new, for example. Vehicles equipped with the "Florence architecture" electrical system (so 612 onward vehicles) are much harder to clock as mileage is stored within so many ecu's and "service vouchers" are stored within the NQS unit. Cars at the cheaper end of the market, with odd gaps in histories are usual suspects. It is a horrible practice, and an unfortunate legacy created by the self-propagating Mileage versus value stigma associated with cars that breach the magic 35,000 miles mark. I am not suggesting every, or most, have been altered but more have than you would realise. Of course there are also perfectly innocent explanations, sometimes instrument packs fail and have to be replaced, TCU's are often upgraded. Even fitting aftermarket wheels can in some instances alter the mileage added to the TCU.

Edited by Cerberaherts on Wednesday 28th January 08:02


Edited by Cerberaherts on Wednesday 28th January 08:09

roygarth

2,673 posts

248 months

Wednesday 28th January 2015
quotequote all
Cerberaherts said:
roygarth said:
Interesting. Could you be more precise?
Certainly. Mostly, any anomalies are thrown up during a PPI, but there are instances where alterations are discovered incidentally during the course of a repair. For example, sometimes jump-starting can cause a voltage spike in the instrument pack, resulting in regional settings to be lost. The ensuing repair operation requires resetting the unit with diagnostic equipment. Part of the procedure accesses imformation regarding mileage, and discrepancies between this algarythm and the displayed mileage can be seen. Altering the mileage in the gearbox TCU is just a case of altering the check-sum of one of the IC's within the unit.It is, of course, impossible to know when any such alteration has taken place. It could be that the vehicle is an ex-rental car coming off fleet while still fairly new, for example. Vehicles equipped with the "Florence architecture" electrical system (so 612 onward vehicles) are much harder to clock as mileage is stored within so many ecu's and "service vouchers" are stored within the NQS unit. Cars at the cheaper end of the market, with odd gaps in histories are usual suspects. It is a horrible practice, and an unfortunate legacy created by the self-propagating Mileage versus value stigma associated with cars that breach the magic 35,000 miles mark. I am not suggesting every, or most, have been altered but more have than you would realise. Of course there are also perfectly innocent explanations, sometimes instrument packs fail and have to be replaced, TCU's are often upgraded. Even fitting aftermarket wheels can in some instances alter the mileage added to the TCU.

Edited by Cerberaherts on Wednesday 28th January 08:02


Edited by Cerberaherts on Wednesday 28th January 08:09
Thanks, but I meant more precise in terms of, for example, what percentage of Ferraris with 'checkable TCU' that come to you premises do you check...and what percent of these have been clocked? Roughly speaking of course....

Cerberaherts

1,651 posts

141 months

Wednesday 28th January 2015
quotequote all
I would only specifically check if directed to do so. I would estimate 25%.

dvb247

270 posts

198 months

Sunday 8th February 2015
quotequote all
Despite all the much debated rational reason not to buy I've done the irrational and put a deposit down on a 430 spider, my 1st Ferrari all being well smile)

red_duke

800 posts

181 months

Monday 9th February 2015
quotequote all
dvb247 said:
Despite all the much debated rational reason not to buy I've done the irrational and put a deposit down on a 430 spider, my 1st Ferrari all being well smile)
Congratulations. Can't think of a single reason not to buy a 430.

We need details though!


roygarth

2,673 posts

248 months

Monday 9th February 2015
quotequote all
Cerberaherts said:
I would only specifically check if directed to do so. I would estimate 25%.
Arguably people who ask you to check have an inkling something is not right? Factor in that you are not specifically asked to check all cars and we are none the wiser!

My own view, FWIW, is that a very small percentage of cars being sold in the Main Dealer Network or by Marque Specialists have been clocked. At the end of the day if you get the ECU checked you can buy with relative peace of mind.

dvb247

270 posts

198 months

Monday 9th February 2015
quotequote all
Red_duke, I've posted in the thread next door "only gone and done it" cheers