Tesla Model 3 revealed

Author
Discussion

Leithen

10,909 posts

267 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Tuna said:
Really, no. Take the example of turning the heating up:

With a dial, you reach across (without looking) and feel the dial turn one click. You know you've done it and how much you've done it by without looking.

With a touch screen, you tap at the screen, having had to look at where your finger is relative to the controls (and check it's in the right mode). You then have to look again (or keep looking) to see if the heating's changed by a little or a lot.
Even with physical buttons and knobs, you look at controls. Everyone does.

feef

5,206 posts

183 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Leithen said:
Tuna said:
Really, no. Take the example of turning the heating up:

With a dial, you reach across (without looking) and feel the dial turn one click. You know you've done it and how much you've done it by without looking.

With a touch screen, you tap at the screen, having had to look at where your finger is relative to the controls (and check it's in the right mode). You then have to look again (or keep looking) to see if the heating's changed by a little or a lot.
Even with physical buttons and knobs, you look at controls. Everyone does.
Not always, it depends how intuitive and natural they feel as well as where they are located

noone looks at the indicator stalks, audio controls on a steering wheel column nor cruise control when operating those, as they fall naturally to 'hand' and are in a familiar location.
With other physical buttons, you can get in the general vicinity and feel for them if needs be, that's not something you can do with a touch screen

AnotherClarkey

3,596 posts

189 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
INWB said:
Nobody seems to be talking about voice activation. It has been in cars for a long time but tend to use rubbish engines. The aircon for example could be easy to integrate. What is better than not taking your hands off the wheel at all?
I quite often use it - very easy to just say 'warmer' or 'cooler. Shame I have to hit a button on the steering wheel to activate the system but then it is 10 year old technology.

I think there is a generational aspect to touchscreens. You only have to look at the expression of disbelief on a kid's face as they prod away at a non-touch screen. It is fast becoming a default and expected technology. If the driving situation demands such concentration that I cannot glance at a control I wouldn't be fumbling for a knob or switch either.

Artey

757 posts

106 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Love it, I can see into the future. I predict that we'll eliminate all inputs with tactical feedback and then magically 5 to 10 years after that someone will have an Eureka moment and will invent knobs and buttons and will make a st ton of money on it (it will be patented so 100% protected) plus will get a peace Nobel prize for solving a problem of driver distraction.

AnotherClarkey

3,596 posts

189 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Artey said:
Love it, I can see into the future. I predict that we'll eliminate all inputs with tactical feedback and then magically 5 to 10 years after that someone will have an Eureka moment and will invent knobs and buttons and will make a st ton of money on it (it will be patented so 100% protected) plus will get a peace Nobel prize for solving a problem of driver distraction.
How would somebody patent it now you have put it out in the public domain?

Artey

757 posts

106 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
AnotherClarkey said:
Artey said:
Love it, I can see into the future. I predict that we'll eliminate all inputs with tactical feedback and then magically 5 to 10 years after that someone will have an Eureka moment and will invent knobs and buttons and will make a st ton of money on it (it will be patented so 100% protected) plus will get a peace Nobel prize for solving a problem of driver distraction.
How would somebody patent it now you have put it out in the public domain?
Do you want to start a new thread to discuss this issue (and another one on spelling). We can have a troll off over there. Makes no sense to spam and derail this thread with unrelated BS.

AnotherClarkey

3,596 posts

189 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Artey said:
Do you want to start a new thread to discuss this issue (and another one on spelling). We can have a troll off over there. Makes no sense to spam and derail this thread with unrelated BS.
Are you one of these 'internet hard men' I read about? How jolly. I won't bother with the spelling thread, you don't seem to appreciate help.

Artey

757 posts

106 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
AnotherClarkey said:
Are you one of these 'internet hard men' I read about? How jolly. I won't bother with the spelling thread, you don't seem to appreciate help.
There's a thin line between many things in life, like for example between being helpful and being patronising. Similar to a very thin line between punani and batty.

speedking31

3,556 posts

136 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
AnotherClarkey said:
I quite often use it - very easy to just say 'warmer' or 'cooler. Shame I have to hit a button on the steering wheel to activate the system but then it is 10 year old technology.
Might be useful if the weather man on the radio says "It is going to be warmer tomorrow and even warmer on Thursday" and your heating gets cranked up!

Artey

757 posts

106 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
speedking31 said:
ight be useful if the weather man on the radio says "It is going to be warmer tomorrow and even warmer on Thursday" and your heating gets cranked up!
There's a great twitter feed that covers these fantastic inventions. https://twitter.com/internetofst?lang=en-gb

AnotherClarkey

3,596 posts

189 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Artey said:
AnotherClarkey said:
Are you one of these 'internet hard men' I read about? How jolly. I won't bother with the spelling thread, you don't seem to appreciate help.
There's a thin line between many things in life, like for example between being helpful and being patronising. Similar to a very thin line between punani and batty.
I think I'll leave it there. You seem a bit fragile.

Artey

757 posts

106 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
AnotherClarkey said:
I think I'll leave it there. You seem a bit fragile.
Better fragile than thick don't you think.

feef

5,206 posts

183 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Girls, girls! you're both pretty

Can we get back to the original topic?

INWB

896 posts

107 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Someone needs to get in the lube and get a room.


babatunde

736 posts

190 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
feef said:
if it was me, I'd implement configurable physical buttons, maybe half a dozen at most, alongside a touchscreen

buttons I never use :

any of the HVAC buttons other than the screen clearing and temperature control, so I could relegate the internal/external air circulation, the air direction and AC on/off buttons to touch screen

I could relegate pretty much every audio function to somewhere in the touch screen as all I need is a volume control and link to my iPhone for music. The rest of the controls are available via the audio control stalk on the steering column anyway

Parking sensor on/off : it's always on, the only time I think I've turned it off was going through a car-wash, so it could be relegated to a touch-screen item

I'm sure there are others, but they're the ones that come to mind that I just don't need a physical button for
This is the thing though, I hung onto my blackberry for way too long because I initially found touchscreens very fiddly, and wanted my keyboard, now I wouldn't go back, we have had full touch screen phones around for a decade plus and apart from builders with their Nokia 3310's we have all grown used to them, even my 85 year old dad.

Driving daily the common used controls are the stereo and heating, if you can have controls where you like and as big or small as you like why do you need to look, also bear in mind that even with buttons and knobs we generally glance across when using controls

Tuna

19,930 posts

284 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
babatunde said:
This is the thing though, I hung onto my blackberry for way too long because I initially found touchscreens very fiddly, and wanted my keyboard, now I wouldn't go back, we have had full touch screen phones around for a decade plus and apart from builders with their Nokia 3310's we have all grown used to them, even my 85 year old dad.
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for a touch screen in a car - for functions like sat nav, it's by far the best interface. It's just not quite so good as the only interface. Comparing it with your phone doesn't really allow for the way we use cars where the primary function is driving rather than focusing on radio/satnav/aircon etc. Compare it instead with cameras - where unless you're buying a very cheap model the useful functions are broken out into physical controls that fall easily to hand.

But we're talking round in circles. Tesla has sold their solution as space age and you either believe that or you don't. It'll be interesting what the Model 3 ends up with as so far the rest of the car has appeared very unthreatening and conventional.

Blaster72

10,842 posts

197 months

Wednesday 1st June 2016
quotequote all
Supercharging will not be free for Model 3 owners

http://www.autoblog.com/2016/06/01/supercharging-n...

Some other interesting snippets in that article too.

otolith

56,154 posts

204 months

Wednesday 1st June 2016
quotequote all
Blaster72 said:
Supercharging will not be free bundled for Model 3 owners

Blaster72

10,842 posts

197 months

Wednesday 1st June 2016
quotequote all
Why the misquote?

otolith

56,154 posts

204 months

Wednesday 1st June 2016
quotequote all
No such thing as a free lunch. It isn't free now, it's bundled with the price of a Model S or Model X. They're proposing offering it as a separate option.