Tesla Model 3 revealed

Author
Discussion

otolith

56,289 posts

205 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Can't they just install more chargers?

Quickmoose

4,499 posts

124 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Zoon said:
The infrastructure may do, but the example I gave of the throughput of a charger will not.
You can fill x number of cars up with petrol in 30 minutes.
You cannot charge a large number of cars up in 30 minutes.
[post office] charger number FOUR pleeaaase [/post office queue]

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

235 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
God that looks crap.

I really don't see the appeal but I am no doubt not their target market.

98elise

26,696 posts

162 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
otolith said:
Can't they just install more chargers?
Tesla are doubling the number in the next year alone.

Edited by 98elise on Friday 1st April 15:11

HB2K

82 posts

107 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Mr Will said:
HB2K said:
Chap I briefly knew at work had an IT company that did this - never actually made a net profit but expanded pretty quickly and then sold out to Microsoft, netting a cool £25m in the process. That's not really Mr Musk's game though - at some point he's going to have to actually start making some money. Early days, though.
I remember reading that his long-term game plan is to make money selling the batteries to other car manufacturers. The cars are a means to bring EVs in to the mass market and force the hand of established manufacturers. Once the big names have make the switch, he can rake in the money providing all the batteries they will need without having to compete with them directly. It's same reason he has "open sourced" all of Tesla's patents - he actively wants other companies using his technology.
Now that is smart. It explains the massive investment in battery manufacture. He's not a fool, is he?

AH33

2,066 posts

136 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Zoon said:
That's the problem I see, lets say the chargers you planned to use on your route are in use, you not only have to wait for your charge you have to wait for theirs as well. Add another couple of cars into the mix and you could either be waiting 2 hours to charge or running out of juice.
Exactly. Nightmare scenario if you actually need to, you know, be somewhere?

HB2K

82 posts

107 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Zoon said:
otolith said:
You don't expect that infrastructure capacity will increase in line with demand then?
The infrastructure may do, but the example I gave of the throughput of a charger will not.
You can fill x number of cars up with petrol in 30 minutes.
You cannot charge a large number of cars up in 30 minutes.

That's the problem I see, lets say the chargers you planned to use on your route are in use, you not only have to wait for your charge you have to wait for theirs as well. Add another couple of cars into the mix and you could either be waiting 2 hours to charge or running out of juice.
I honestly think overnight home charging removes a lot of this as an issue. You're then only left with long-distance drivers doing 200+ miles in one go, some of whom will be catered for by motorway service station hook-ups. Anyone who uses Oxford services will have seen the large number there already.

0a

23,902 posts

195 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Zoon said:
The infrastructure may do, but the example I gave of the throughput of a charger will not.
You can fill x number of cars up with petrol in 30 minutes.
You cannot charge a large number of cars up in 30 minutes.

That's the problem I see, lets say the chargers you planned to use on your route are in use, you not only have to wait for your charge you have to wait for theirs as well. Add another couple of cars into the mix and you could either be waiting 2 hours to charge or running out of juice.
Yes but the difference is that I cannot have a petrol station installed at my house, but I'm £1k away from having an electric charging station there. For most people this might entirely resolve their fuelling requirements.

feef

5,206 posts

184 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Zoon said:
otolith said:
You don't expect that infrastructure capacity will increase in line with demand then?
The infrastructure may do, but the example I gave of the throughput of a charger will not.
You can fill x number of cars up with petrol in 30 minutes.
You cannot charge a large number of cars up in 30 minutes.

That's the problem I see, lets say the chargers you planned to use on your route are in use, you not only have to wait for your charge you have to wait for theirs as well. Add another couple of cars into the mix and you could either be waiting 2 hours to charge or running out of juice.
Tesla also have their domestic battery power supply system, and I could envisage those being deployed into the workings of the superchargers so the load of charging a vehicle is evened out over the day.

That would help the power infrastructure cope with the load of multiple vehicles charging at once with an increased in number of charging stations

Zoon

6,718 posts

122 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
0a said:
Yes but the difference is that I cannot have a petrol station installed at my house, but I'm £1k away from having an electric charging station there. For most people this might entirely resolve their fuelling requirements.
The difference is that you don't need a petrol station at home.
Home charging will resolve most motoring but not all. If the number of chargers increase in line with sales then I see the issue being addressed which can only be a good thing.

tadaah

214 posts

212 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
HB2K said:
Mr Will said:
HB2K said:
Chap I briefly knew at work had an IT company that did this - never actually made a net profit but expanded pretty quickly and then sold out to Microsoft, netting a cool £25m in the process. That's not really Mr Musk's game though - at some point he's going to have to actually start making some money. Early days, though.
I remember reading that his long-term game plan is to make money selling the batteries to other car manufacturers. The cars are a means to bring EVs in to the mass market and force the hand of established manufacturers. Once the big names have make the switch, he can rake in the money providing all the batteries they will need without having to compete with them directly. It's same reason he has "open sourced" all of Tesla's patents - he actively wants other companies using his technology.
Now that is smart. It explains the massive investment in battery manufacture. He's not a fool, is he?
Billionaires usually aren't! (Except Mr Trump wink )

chandrew

979 posts

210 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
-Z- said:
smilo996 said:
Compared to the BMW i3 which really is revolutionary, Tesla cars are like 70's Caddy.
rofl

i3, revolutionary? Expensive, slow and crap range on pure electric power. Honestly the T3 wipes the floor with it in every way.
I have an i3, a battery only one, but this is a big way forward from the i3. We bought the i3 because (a) it was cheap and could do 80% + of what we would have used a model S for (b) we reckoned that the Model 3 would be 3 years from being on the streets, hence the BMW was a stop gap.

The i3 is good in terms of how they've used materials. It's basically all plastic but as an old Lotus owner they are light years ahead of how Lotus is using plastic. It feels typically BMW solid - you'd never know all the panels were plastic if you weren't told. It's also light which benefits handling though obviously the tyres are the limiting factor.

That being said anything software-related feels prehistoric in the i3 after time in a Tesla. And the iDrive controller basically has a User Interface which combines a gen 1 iPod with a Palm Pilot. I worried about the Tesla's touch only display but spend a few hours in it and it feels like the only sensible solution.

The i3 isn't really slow, though obviously not Tesla fast. The instant torque makes it surprisingly fun in the twisties.

georgeq

110 posts

127 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
I do wonder what it takes for regular car manufacturers to wake up and see what's happening here. Maybe they are too busy fighting over Nordschleife lap times.

I'm currently in the market for a zippy car that slips under the radar in day to day life. I rarely drive more than 60 miles per day, never drive on a track and have a handful of classic cars to enjoy on weekends.

Audi S3, Golf R, BMW M2/M4 — all of these look like vulgar, overpriced and soon to be outdated toys now. The Model 3 completely wiped out all interest I had in them. I'm not sure what I'll buy for the next 3 years until the delivery of the Model 3. Maybe a 991.1 GTS to celebrate the end of an era, but that's not really "under the radar".

George111

6,930 posts

252 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
HB2K said:
Mr Will said:
HB2K said:
Chap I briefly knew at work had an IT company that did this - never actually made a net profit but expanded pretty quickly and then sold out to Microsoft, netting a cool £25m in the process. That's not really Mr Musk's game though - at some point he's going to have to actually start making some money. Early days, though.
I remember reading that his long-term game plan is to make money selling the batteries to other car manufacturers. The cars are a means to bring EVs in to the mass market and force the hand of established manufacturers. Once the big names have make the switch, he can rake in the money providing all the batteries they will need without having to compete with them directly. It's same reason he has "open sourced" all of Tesla's patents - he actively wants other companies using his technology.
Now that is smart. It explains the massive investment in battery manufacture. He's not a fool, is he?
Not a fool but a gambler ! Why would BMW/VAG/Mercedes want to buy his batteries ? By the time EVs are popular enough for VAG to be selling an EV in place of the Golf, they will be buying vast amounts from China. What's the incentive to buy Musk batteries, apart from the comical name ?

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

171 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
feef said:
Tesla also have their domestic battery power supply system, and I could envisage those being deployed into the workings of the superchargers so the load of charging a vehicle is evened out over the day.

That would help the power infrastructure cope with the load of multiple vehicles charging at once with an increased in number of charging stations
They've already discontinued the higher capacity 'powerwall'. And the other will follow soon, it makes no environmental or economic sense whatsoever.

At least when the Model 3 fails to shift the required units we'll finally see the end of this pointless subsidy-addicted company, and hopefully people will realise how stupid the idea of mass use of electric cars is.

~2% of UK primary power came from renewables (inc. hydro) last year, and for at least the next 4/5 years the UK grid will be on a knife-edge each winter. That 2% is already costing every household ~£300 on their bills and more through general taxation etc.

Renewables/electric cars are incapable of replacing hydrocarbon fuels at scale.

danrst171

103 posts

101 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Nothing to stop you hiring a diesel car for the day to drive over 200 miles.

Innowaybored

896 posts

108 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Is anyone else waiting longer than 2 hours for the confirmation email? I have placed my deposit at a pop up store but still not got the email.

They reort that have "sold" 35 in the last 24 hours. Not bad for a guy standing next to a model S in a shopping centre in solihull !

V8LM

5,174 posts

210 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Noticeable that they ask for a card and no PayPal option.

0000

13,812 posts

192 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
Is it? Wouldn't they have to give Paypal a percentage then?

Guvernator

13,170 posts

166 months

Friday 1st April 2016
quotequote all
I really really wanted to like this. As a daily driver it sounded superb. 95% of our journeys are short and we probably do less than 200 mile a week. We also have a large drive so this would have suited our usage profile perfectly and the money saved on fuel, tax etc would mean I can spend more on the fun car.

Unfortunately it looks woeful. People saying it looks nice are obviously looking at different pictures. Being said to look like a BMW 5 series GT is NOT a good thing! That interior with the stuck on ipad also looks half finished.

Shame I was really interested but they've lost me at the last hurdle.