Hyundai IONIQ 5 N - am I mad?

Hyundai IONIQ 5 N - am I mad?

Author
Discussion

SWoll

18,439 posts

259 months

Wednesday 24th April
quotequote all
Familymad said:
£44k to hire a £60k car for 4 years and 40k miles?

The depreciation on new EV's is making leasing/PCP costs utterly ridiculous. I'd leave it to company car/SS drivers and pick one up in a couple of years for half price personally.

Terminator X

15,105 posts

205 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
I like the look of it tbf and good on them for trying to inject a bit of "emotion".

TX.

Tractor Driver

103 posts

31 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
SWoll said:
£44k to hire a £60k car for 4 years and 40k miles?

The depreciation on new EV's is making leasing/PCP costs utterly ridiculous. I'd leave it to company car/SS drivers and pick one up in a couple of years for half price personally.
I agree. Costs are bonkers. Having said that, prices on our sal sac scheme at work are getting daft too. Feels like they’ve increased way in excess of the monthly allowance and only the lease companies are benefitting.

Tempted to just buy an old smoker and potter around in that, except that work have stated that you can’t use the car allowance on anything over seven years old!

cossey

149 posts

190 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
The Tesla cost is heavily impacted by the interest rate. The Model Y is <2% but the Model 3P is nearly 10%.
A few months time once any pent up demand is gone and the cost will drop significantly without them having to mess around with the headline price.

Familymad

673 posts

218 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
cossey said:
The Tesla cost is heavily impacted by the interest rate. The Model Y is <2% but the Model 3P is nearly 10%.
A few months time once any pent up demand is gone and the cost will drop significantly without them having to mess around with the headline price.
Yep agree with that. I swooped in for a Model Y LR at £44670 new and lease is £3k down and £440 inc vat. So less that VAT it’s a cheap hack. It’s always worth checking the a Tesla site weekly as the rates go up and down like his tweets.

ZesPak

24,435 posts

197 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
Friend of mine has a "regular" IONIQ 5, it's a great family car.

MCarpentier1 said:
I *really* like the look of the IONIQ 5 N, even if 650ps in a hatchback is totally ludicrous.
While 650 hp is A LOT, especially EV horsepower, don't confuse this with a Golf. In dimensions it's nearly an exact match of an Audi Q5, but ~200kg heavier.
Don't get me wrong, it'll be painfully fast, but that hp number isn't there just to light up the tires.

Durzel

12,276 posts

169 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
SWoll said:
Familymad said:
£44k to hire a £60k car for 4 years and 40k miles?

The depreciation on new EV's is making leasing/PCP costs utterly ridiculous. I'd leave it to company car/SS drivers and pick one up in a couple of years for half price personally.
You're right, but at the same time you've got a £60k car for 4 years that you can pretend is yours.

You're paying money either way, either in depreciation if you buy outright (my 2020 M3P has lost ~£830/month in value to date, if not more) or to rent it, so I guess what's the difference?

I've never been a fan of finance, always bought outright, but in the case of Tesla (and perhaps new cars generally) I've been punished for it.

To flip your argument on its head - you get to drive a car you might otherwise not be able to buy, and enjoy all of the benefits from it as if it was your own, for £16k less than the asking price.

That being said - 9.6% APR on the new Model 3 Performance is a joke.

fatjon

2,219 posts

214 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
Some questions

How much of that HP is available when you haven’t preheated the batteries for 20-30 minutes before hitting the go pedal?
How much of it is available at 69% battery charge.
How much battery charge does it use to preheat the batteries to full performance mode temperature?

You might find the answers informative.


thisnameistaken

24 posts

29 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
Are you giving me homework?

740EVTORQUES

393 posts

2 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
fatjon said:
Some questions

How much of that HP is available when you haven’t preheated the batteries for 20-30 minutes before hitting the go pedal?
How much of it is available at 69% battery charge.
How much battery charge does it use to preheat the batteries to full performance mode temperature?

You might find the answers informative.
You also have to warm up ICE vehicles before any use, not just high performance, that uses up petrol and takes time you realise?



fatjon

2,219 posts

214 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
thisnameistaken said:
Are you giving me homework?
No, the OP who is about to buy his 601HP IQ5N.

fatjon

2,219 posts

214 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
740EVTORQUES said:
fatjon said:
Some questions

How much of that HP is available when you haven’t preheated the batteries for 20-30 minutes before hitting the go pedal?
How much of it is available at 69% battery charge.
How much battery charge does it use to preheat the batteries to full performance mode temperature?

You might find the answers informative.
You also have to warm up ICE vehicles before any use, not just high performance, that uses up petrol and takes time you realise?
Thanks, very informative. Warming up an ICE car takes a few minutes not 30 minutes plus to not quite get there and 21% of your available charge while doing it.

Taken this morning in advance of your smart arsed comments. I turned on preheat at 10:57, arrived home at 11:24 by which time it had still not reached full power temperature and was limiting to 360Kw (480HP), having burned through 21% of the total energy expended on the journey warming the batteries. I was charged to 90% when I left and 76% when I got home. At less than 70% battery preheat and full power are locked out and you can only get 480HP. Don't get me wrong 480HP is plenty but annoying when you paid for 585HP. If you want full power you need to charge to 100%, spend a good chunk of it heating the batteries and then you have a few miles of full power before it dips below the 70% threshold and even in GT mode you get limited back to about 480HP.
I can live with it but I would have preferred to be told this before I spent my £65k and maybe the OP would like to make an informed decision.


Familymad

673 posts

218 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
Didn’t realise that info. I’m sure Kia won’t want potential buyers to know it either.

Tesla don’t appear to need this to achieve repeatable and full performance. Do Porsches? Intrigued

PetrolHeadInRecovery

72 posts

16 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
Familymad said:
Didn’t realise that info. I’m sure Kia won’t want potential buyers to know it either.

Tesla don’t appear to need this to achieve repeatable and full performance. Do Porsches? Intrigued
IIRC the Ioniq 5N battery is different from other E-GMP ones, more advanced thermal management etc. In any cse, I think KIA EV6 GT was among the first EVs that could do a lap of Nurburgring without going into limp mode. I read a claim that a 5N could do two sub-8 minute laps in a row (TBC, of course).

I don't know if the Ioniq 5N will drop into the 480hp valet mode, too - might still be enough power to get under 8 minutes? At least the KIA EV6 looked pretty lively even towards the end of the lap. The background article (in French) mentions the reasons they had almost given up on taking EVs to the track (one of them an experience with a Tesla, for what it is worth).

All this is just academic interest for me as someone pottering around with a standard 4WD, meekly letting cyclists and faster joggers past...


740EVTORQUES

393 posts

2 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
All EVs need to heat their batteries for peak performance, it’s what ‘ludicrous mode’ does in a Tesla for example

The EV6GT has a remarkable ability to produce full
power without fade , which is also why it can fast charge right up to 80% whereas , for example, a Mach E starts to reduce its charge speed well before this point.

The new Taycan is significantly better as it can charge (and discharge) optimally at 15 degrees, much cooler than the 1st gen.

That means less need to heat the battery (and less power consumed doing it)

But I thought batteries had hardly changed in the last 100 years or so?

By 2030 or 2035 people will look back and wonder why on earth some were doubting that the technology would be in any way inferior to ICE.

fatjon

2,219 posts

214 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all

The EV6GT has a remarkable ability to produce full
power without fade , which is also why it can fast charge right up to 80% whereas , for example, a Mach E starts to reduce its charge speed well before this point.”

within ten minutes of the battery heater shutting down at 69% my car goes from 430kw (584.6hp) to 370kw (475hp). Hardly a remarkable fade free performance. Tested yesterday in an ambient of 11c. It took the best part of an hour to reach optimal temperature and I had to stop and recharge once as it got below 70% before reaching optimal.

By 40% charge it is down to 275kw (380hp).

I like the car just fine but just because I bought one does not mean I’m going to mislead someone looking to buy one. Meet a fully charged one with warmed up batteries in it’s 20 minute sweet spot and it’s silly fast. Half charged and cold, it’s fairly quick and no more.

PetrolHeadInRecovery

72 posts

16 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
fatjon said:


within ten minutes of the battery heater shutting down at 69% my car goes from 430kw (584.6hp) to 370kw (475hp). Hardly a remarkable fade free performance. Tested yesterday in an ambient of 11c. It took the best part of an hour to reach optimal temperature and I had to stop and recharge once as it got below 70% before reaching optimal.

By 40% charge it is down to 275kw (380hp).
I guess the (near) "fade-free" is/was relative to the competition.

Regarding the power figures on different levels of charge: are there published numbers anywhere?


ZesPak

24,435 posts

197 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
PetrolHeadInRecovery said:
I guess the (near) "fade-free" is/was relative to the competition.
Regarding the power figures on different levels of charge: are there published numbers anywhere?
This has been benched on teslas a number of times, from what I can find the difference between 90% and 15% SoC is less than 20% on a TM3.
In accelleration from a standstill there's not much in it as at lower speeds the motors are limited by traction anyway.

This chart for example suggests a ~.5s loss in 0-65mph time.


ChocolateFrog

25,466 posts

174 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
SWoll said:
Familymad said:
£44k to hire a £60k car for 4 years and 40k miles?

The depreciation on new EV's is making leasing/PCP costs utterly ridiculous. I'd leave it to company car/SS drivers and pick one up in a couple of years for half price personally.
Me too, that's outrageous.

Maybe pick up an used EV6 GT or Model S for a couple of years.

ChocolateFrog

25,466 posts

174 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
fatjon said:
Some questions

How much of that HP is available when you haven’t preheated the batteries for 20-30 minutes before hitting the go pedal?
How much of it is available at 69% battery charge.
How much battery charge does it use to preheat the batteries to full performance mode temperature?

You might find the answers informative.
Just give it the beans. Won't take many seconds for the batteries to warm up when they're pumping out a 1000 amps.