£30-40k, two seats, convertible, for trackdays and touring

£30-40k, two seats, convertible, for trackdays and touring

Author
Discussion

C70R

Original Poster:

17,596 posts

105 months

Thursday 14th September 2023
quotequote all
gashead1105 said:
Bloody hell, that spyder is lovely. Seller would probably take 40k also. Surely that's the end of the thread?
It was an auction, and it ended. I'll keep my eyes peeled for another.

braddo

10,522 posts

189 months

Thursday 14th September 2023
quotequote all
Now i am not sure which spyder you are referring to but get a boxster spyder (or most porsches) up on its toes properly and honestly, you will get it (and be annoyed how good they are. Like BMW in the 80s and 90s). biggrin

gashead1105

560 posts

154 months

Friday 15th September 2023
quotequote all
C70R said:
It was an auction, and it ended. I'll keep my eyes peeled for another.
The one on autotrader was an auction? Looked like a private sale from the advert

Royal Jelly

3,688 posts

199 months

Friday 15th September 2023
quotequote all
C70R said:
Crudeoink said:
C70R said:
Ok, let's say for argument's sake that I was to consider a Boxster.

Which one should I look at? Which is the most reliable? Where's the value-for-money sweet spot? Or is it just a case of buying the newest one I can?
I'd be looking at 987 Spyders and 981 GTS.
Looks like the they are both sadly out of budget.

Edited by C70R on Thursday 14th September 08:34
A 981GTS is merely an S with an option pack, which made sense new, but the used prices are a fair gulf apart.

For your budget, you’ll get a nice S, with the options important to you. Reliable, quick, supple, glorious noise etc.


C70R

Original Poster:

17,596 posts

105 months

Friday 15th September 2023
quotequote all
gashead1105 said:
C70R said:
It was an auction, and it ended. I'll keep my eyes peeled for another.
The one on autotrader was an auction? Looked like a private sale from the advert
Sorry, I think we're talking about different things. I was referring to the 4C.

gashead1105

560 posts

154 months

Friday 15th September 2023
quotequote all
Yeah, I was looking at the porsche, which looks spot on to me. You can even get the porsche warranty put back on if you like, though have to do the 111 point check.

C70R

Original Poster:

17,596 posts

105 months

Friday 15th September 2023
quotequote all
This is, unfortunately, how I thought this conversation would end up.

I probably need to go and drive one of these Boxsters to see what the fuss is about, but I just don't find myself lusting after them in the same way that I do an Alfa or Alpine. That plays such a big part of the drive to change for me, that I'd find it tough to sink so much money into something that's 'very competent'.

braddo

10,522 posts

189 months

Friday 15th September 2023
quotequote all
It's interesting that if you compromise on a coupe it opens up 3 great options - 4C, Alpine and Evora. I don't care for convertibles but I defo want a manual box, which I'm always sad about that it rules out the 4C and Alpine. I'm also not a big fan of turbos but I'd compromise on that if these two cars had manual options.

Not sure the 4C will be roomier than an Elise? Might need to check if you haven't already.

Royal Jelly

3,688 posts

199 months

Friday 15th September 2023
quotequote all
C70R said:
This is, unfortunately, how I thought this conversation would end up.

I probably need to go and drive one of these Boxsters to see what the fuss is about, but I just don't find myself lusting after them in the same way that I do an Alfa or Alpine. That plays such a big part of the drive to change for me, that I'd find it tough to sink so much money into something that's 'very competent'.
Yeh you do.

I understand the Alpine - it’s lightweight philosophy and all that, but it isn’t a convertible as you said. It’s not for me for a handful of reasons, but it does what it does well.

The 4C on the other hand, doesn’t do anything as well as either the 981 or the Alpine. Personal opinion, but I found it a hefty led down.

I am biased as a 981 Cayman owner, but a 981 with the right options takes some beating. Yes, it’s ultra competent, but that’s a good thing. Chassis, engine, noise, handling, comfort, practicality… it excels in all of these areas.

I have an S, but there is a compelling argument for a base model, because you can wring it out more.

FYI they’re very sensitive to wheel geometry. A good setup by someone knowledgeable should be one of the first things you do with it.

It made a huge difference when I got mine done. It was good before, but..

SFTWend

847 posts

76 months

Friday 15th September 2023
quotequote all
I had a Boxster 987 S as my daily driver and it really is the right answer. Probably better on track and for touring than the Z4.

However, a purchase with that budget needs to satisfy head and heart. If you dream of the Alfa just wait a few months as sports car prices are on the downturn.

C70R

Original Poster:

17,596 posts

105 months

Saturday 16th September 2023
quotequote all
SFTWend said:
I had a Boxster 987 S as my daily driver and it really is the right answer. Probably better on track and for touring than the Z4.
Surely at 5-6x the cost it absolutely must be!

jamesbilluk

3,703 posts

184 months

Saturday 16th September 2023
quotequote all
I would see what 4C prices do as well,

I used to have a 987 Boxster RS60, a competent car, but it never felt as much as event like the 4C spider did, that looked and felt like a mini super car, and having the carbon on display.



C70R

Original Poster:

17,596 posts

105 months

Saturday 16th September 2023
quotequote all
jamesbilluk said:
I would see what 4C prices do as well,

I used to have a 987 Boxster RS60, a competent car, but it never felt as much as event like the 4C spider did, that looked and felt like a mini super car, and having the carbon on display.
You've encapsulated my feelings perfectly.

coldel

7,899 posts

147 months

Sunday 17th September 2023
quotequote all
C70R said:
SFTWend said:
I had a Boxster 987 S as my daily driver and it really is the right answer. Probably better on track and for touring than the Z4.
Surely at 5-6x the cost it absolutely must be!
Yes I was going to say lol paid just over 5k for my 3.0si E85. And its absolutely solid and reliable. Bang for buck, not much comes close!

But yes give the Boxster a run out, I tried a Cayman 981 and found it a bit meh, but then I was in a VX220T as my fun car at the time which unfortunately the safe comfy 981 isnt going to get close to. I am sure its a great daily option though (as most Porsches are). I guess your reluctance is a bit like mine around Boxsters, is that they are everywhere. I love having something different and quirky that isn't engineered to within an inch of its life.

cerb4.5lee

30,730 posts

181 months

Sunday 17th September 2023
quotequote all
coldel said:
C70R said:
SFTWend said:
I had a Boxster 987 S as my daily driver and it really is the right answer. Probably better on track and for touring than the Z4.
Surely at 5-6x the cost it absolutely must be!
Yes I was going to say lol paid just over 5k for my 3.0si E85. And its absolutely solid and reliable. Bang for buck, not much comes close!

But yes give the Boxster a run out, I tried a Cayman 981 and found it a bit meh, but then I was in a VX220T as my fun car at the time which unfortunately the safe comfy 981 isnt going to get close to. I am sure its a great daily option though (as most Porsches are). I guess your reluctance is a bit like mine around Boxsters, is that they are everywhere. I love having something different and quirky that isn't engineered to within an inch of its life.
I definitely need a go in a Boxster/Cayman, because all I ever read about them is how dull they are to drive. Although I have to admit that I found the 911 C2S(991.2) a bit dull to drive as well. So maybe it is just a Porsche thing perhaps, and they are more about the badge...rather than the way they actually drive?

I do always like seeing them out on the roads though, and I do remember properly lusting after the Cayman when it first came out as well. Everyone does seem to say that if you want fun from a car then generally front engine/rwd is the way to go, because as a general rule mid or rear engine/rwd doesn't offer the same kind of thrills in comparison.

I guess that something like the Cayman/Boxster come into their own on a track in fairness, whereas on the road they probably don't reward/thrill you enough perhaps? I've never driven the Cayman/Boxster though, so I'm just going from what I've read over the years about them that's all.

coldel

7,899 posts

147 months

Sunday 17th September 2023
quotequote all
My old boss she had a 911 and I remember we had a little tear through the countryside after a work event when I had my NA VX220.
She commented how easy it was to drive one even though she isnt by any means a great driver, they are the supercar that your normal folk can jump into a drive fast, because they are so engineered and controlled - whereas my VX was talking all the time giving me brain overload lol she was probably adjusting the radio channel and having a little sing song as she drove along!

SFTWend

847 posts

76 months

Sunday 17th September 2023
quotequote all
coldel said:
C70R said:
SFTWend said:
I had a Boxster 987 S as my daily driver and it really is the right answer. Probably better on track and for touring than the Z4.
Surely at 5-6x the cost it absolutely must be!
Yes I was going to say lol paid just over 5k for my 3.0si E85. And its absolutely solid and reliable. Bang for buck, not much comes close!

But yes give the Boxster a run out, I tried a Cayman 981 and found it a bit meh, but then I was in a VX220T as my fun car at the time which unfortunately the safe comfy 981 isnt going to get close to. I am sure its a great daily option though (as most Porsches are). I guess your reluctance is a bit like mine around Boxsters, is that they are everywhere. I love having something different and quirky that isn't engineered to within an inch of its life.
Budget will buy a newer and faster car, but newer cars are often less fun to drive and certainly wont be 5/6 times better.

Boxster meets the brief very well, but it wont have the character of something Italian.

4C would be great fun, providing the suspension mods have been done, but I don't see it being either a robust track tool or very practical for touring.

I'm not sure there is anything that doesn't require some compromise and maybe keeping the Z4 until it dies makes most sense. Especially in the short term with the way the market is likely to go for sports cars in this budget.

Royal Jelly

3,688 posts

199 months

Sunday 17th September 2023
quotequote all
coldel said:
My old boss she had a 911 and I remember we had a little tear through the countryside after a work event when I had my NA VX220.
She commented how easy it was to drive one even though she isnt by any means a great driver, they are the supercar that your normal folk can jump into a drive fast, because they are so engineered and controlled - whereas my VX was talking all the time giving me brain overload lol she was probably adjusting the radio channel and having a little sing song as she drove along!
rofl

Looks better, sounds better, faster, more practical, more comfortable, more reliable..

Depends what you want, I suppose.

Square Leg

14,703 posts

190 months

Sunday 17th September 2023
quotequote all
I had a 987 Spyder, also had a 4C and 3 Exiges (roadster and 350 sport)

As much as I love the Alfa (now have a Giulia QV, previously had a Stelvio QV), and the Exiges, for the OP’ stated usage the Spyder wins hands down.
I’d have another without a doubt.


coldel

7,899 posts

147 months

Monday 18th September 2023
quotequote all
Royal Jelly said:
coldel said:
My old boss she had a 911 and I remember we had a little tear through the countryside after a work event when I had my NA VX220.
She commented how easy it was to drive one even though she isnt by any means a great driver, they are the supercar that your normal folk can jump into a drive fast, because they are so engineered and controlled - whereas my VX was talking all the time giving me brain overload lol she was probably adjusting the radio channel and having a little sing song as she drove along!
rofl

Looks better, sounds better, faster, more practical, more comfortable, more reliable..

Depends what you want, I suppose.
Hmmm looking better is subjective, I think the slug look of the 911 is a poor design by modern standards. It looks dull and uninteresting. Sounds worse, it sounds like a diesel or there is something wrong with it, listen to a Maserati drive by and you hit cloud nine. My VX at the time had the VSE on it and sounded absolutely amazing. Faster yes, more practical yes yes, more comfy yes yes yes! More reliable? No! The VX220 has a bog standard vauxhall lump in it tried and tested over millions of cars and sits in a lightweight car so very unstressed, if you have something go wrong its a cheap Vauxhall parts bin repair. Ask any 911 owner just how many years off their life they lost when that engine light pops up on the dash. The word Bork was invented with Porsche in mind biglaugh