New power plant Option
Discussion
Why am i doing this mostly the turbo issues "heat", parts availability for the transmissions, and just overall complexity of the V6 turbo power plant.
The GM LS and the GM F4O transmission are readily available and very reliable.I also felt it would be a great retrofit or new car option if I could figure out how to do it with out modifing the chassis. This is going to be a direct bolt in option.
The main reason, I was told it could not be done. Well that is all it took to push me over the edge
The GM LS and the GM F4O transmission are readily available and very reliable.I also felt it would be a great retrofit or new car option if I could figure out how to do it with out modifing the chassis. This is going to be a direct bolt in option.
The main reason, I was told it could not be done. Well that is all it took to push me over the edge
sundance002 said:
This is a Rossion? Not an M12? The Rossion is 8inch longer than the M12 so be very suprised to see it in the M12, would like to be wrong though
I believe they run the same chassis.... certainly looking at the pics the engine bay and tub looks identical.I read the thread on the american forum and its claimed this LS engine is only 19lbs heavier as a package than the Ford V6 we run.... certainly from the research I have done a large NA V engine should weigh similar to our package.
Of cause the box might be heavier... but we all long for a beefed up box were 5th isn't a concern.
This could be a major step forward in a surprising direction... looking forward to seeing the finished item
andygtt said:
I believe they run the same chassis.... certainly looking at the pics the engine bay and tub looks identical.
I read the thread on the american forum and its claimed this LS engine is only 19lbs heavier as a package than the Ford V6 we run.... certainly from the research I have done a large NA V engine should weigh similar to our package.
Of cause the box might be heavier... but we all long for a beefed up box were 5th isn't a concern.
This could be a major step forward in a surprising direction... looking forward to seeing the finished item
I would like to be wrong but i know im not, they extended the chassis at the rear to make the room for the box to be inline around 8inches and that made a big diff to the way they drive, not as well balanced as M12, they had one at bespoke speak to Skip he will confirm, great idea but it will not fit the M12 with gearbox inline, it was the only way they could get it to fit the rossion, they are chalk and chease in the way they drive completly diff car, sorry to sayI read the thread on the american forum and its claimed this LS engine is only 19lbs heavier as a package than the Ford V6 we run.... certainly from the research I have done a large NA V engine should weigh similar to our package.
Of cause the box might be heavier... but we all long for a beefed up box were 5th isn't a concern.
This could be a major step forward in a surprising direction... looking forward to seeing the finished item
Edited by sundance002 on Thursday 4th December 22:30
sundance002 said:
kenloen said:
You can see from this pic the extended size of the inter cooler housing and the below this it extends to the end of box hence it sits a way behind rear wheelsHence the rear clam is longer than ours
You need to have a look at the OP's picture which has been shoehorned into a standard un-modified chassis.
F.C. said:
sundance002 said:
kenloen said:
You can see from this pic the extended size of the inter cooler housing and the below this it extends to the end of box hence it sits a way behind rear wheelsHence the rear clam is longer than ours
You need to have a look at the OP's picture which has been shoehorned into a standard un-modified chassis.
Gassing Station | Noble | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff