MNR reverse kits?

MNR reverse kits?

Author
Discussion

colin 82

Original Poster:

235 posts

203 months

Friday 19th March 2010
quotequote all
Hi guys.....well, after searching the net for some months now it looks like i have secured a MNR VORTEX, powered by an R1 engine.
The car does not have a revers and was hoping you helpful lot could help me. I hear MNR do there own eletric reverse......anyone on here fitted or used on?? price ets??

thanks in advance

colin

singlecoil

33,768 posts

247 months

Friday 19th March 2010
quotequote all
I had a feeling that MNR, or maybe it was somebody else, did an actual reverse gearbox rather than electric. I know MK do an electric kit.

I expect MNR will be able to tell you about prices (and which type they do)

rdodger

1,088 posts

204 months

Friday 19th March 2010
quotequote all
MNR's reverse solution is a inline gearbox similar to the Quaife.



£587 I believe.

There was a feature in CKC's last issue I think on bike reverse kits.



Edited by rdodger on Friday 19th March 12:24

gtmdriver

333 posts

174 months

Friday 19th March 2010
quotequote all
Here's one example of an electric reverse gear.

I took this photo at Stoneleigh last year.

I though this was quite a neat solution.



The toothed wheel is sandwiched between the propshaft and diff flanges and is driven by a pre-engaged starter motor.

If only I could remember what car it was fitted to.

spdpug98

1,551 posts

223 months

Friday 19th March 2010
quotequote all
If you want to fit either the MNR or Quaife reverse box, you will also require 2 new prop shafts to enable it to fit, I have the Quaife reverse box on my MNR

Not sure how the electric / starter motor system works but I beileve it may be MK who make it

Edited: for my usual terrible speellling!

Edited by spdpug98 on Friday 19th March 18:47

Stubby Pete

2,488 posts

247 months

Saturday 20th March 2010
quotequote all
gtmdriver said:
Here's one example of an electric reverse gear.

I took this photo at Stoneleigh last year.

I though this was quite a neat solution.



The toothed wheel is sandwiched between the propshaft and diff flanges and is driven by a pre-engaged starter motor.

If only I could remember what car it was fitted to.
To take this one level further and to reduce the drag when not in use, the starter motor can be fitted to a cradle which is engaged by pulling a cable tight.

singlecoil

33,768 posts

247 months

Sunday 21st March 2010
quotequote all
Stubby Pete said:
To take this one level further and to reduce the drag when not in use, the starter motor can be fitted to a cradle which is engaged by pulling a cable tight.
I'm not following that. What would the source of drag be when the motor is not being used?

OwenK

3,472 posts

196 months

Sunday 21st March 2010
quotequote all
singlecoil said:
Stubby Pete said:
To take this one level further and to reduce the drag when not in use, the starter motor can be fitted to a cradle which is engaged by pulling a cable tight.
I'm not following that. What would the source of drag be when the motor is not being used?
The motor turning backward creates electricity from the rotation (working as a dynamo) which will add a load to the engine. Not much, but still...

Ferg

15,242 posts

258 months

Sunday 21st March 2010
quotequote all
OwenK said:
singlecoil said:
Stubby Pete said:
To take this one level further and to reduce the drag when not in use, the starter motor can be fitted to a cradle which is engaged by pulling a cable tight.
I'm not following that. What would the source of drag be when the motor is not being used?
The motor turning backward creates electricity from the rotation (working as a dynamo) which will add a load to the engine. Not much, but still...
But it's engaged by a solenoid. It isn't connected unless it's being used...

Colin 1985

1,921 posts

171 months

Sunday 21st March 2010
quotequote all
Ferg said:
But it's engaged by a solenoid. It isn't connected unless it's being used...
This^^^^



Sorry for the poor picture, but on a chain drive car the reverse I use consists of a starter motor which, when engaged throws a cog onto a toothed fly wheel bolted to the diff. Its not a great solution because it is geared too high so struggles to turn the wheels (could do with a better battery maybe or a slower turning motor) but if done properly an electric reverse has its advantages. For example my fathers BEC used a quaife reverse box and it seemed to sap quite a bit of power and also required its own oil supply which when hot would expand, with a reverse box you also have more rotational inertia so will slow you down by more than you might expect.

I think zcars have a solution give them a ring.

Also a quick google: http://www.westgarage.co.uk/contact/contact1.html

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

199 months

Sunday 21st March 2010
quotequote all
Reverse transfer boxes are a PITA IMO. Having had a mech box on my BEC (later removed) I would go for the the electric reverse option.

My experience of them was:

  • Bloody heavy
  • Power sapping
  • Can cause severe vibrations at speed - the reason why I took mine off.
  • Makes gear change very clunky - torque tube centre bearing PS gives a much better change.
  • Expensive compared to electric

gtmdriver

333 posts

174 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
As Ferg pointed out the whole point of using the starter motor is that it's not engaged when it's not in use.
The drive gear retracts once it's switched off in exactly the same way as it does when it's connected to the engine.

spdpug98

1,551 posts

223 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
Just to add a bit to my previous post, I believe that the starter motor reverse is not really a full time solution; if you think that you will need to use it on a regular basis for reversing (if that makes sense), more of a solution to pass the IVA etc

It will not get the car up an incline, whereas the Quaife and MNR box will. I needed a proper reverse box as my drive slopes down towards the garage and I would never get the car out with a starter motor reverse - or so people with them have told me

Or someone with one will be along in a minute to tell me - I am talking a load of tosh!

singlecoil

33,768 posts

247 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
spdpug98 said:
Or someone with one will be along in a minute to tell me - I am talking a load of tosh!
Not tosh, in your situation you do need the gearbox solution. Most people will be ok with the electric version though.

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

199 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
spdpug98 said:
Just to add a bit to my previous post, I believe that the starter motor reverse is not really a full time solution; if you think that you will need to use it on a regular basis for reversing (if that makes sense), more of a solution to pass the IVA etc

It will not get the car up an incline, whereas the Quaife and MNR box will. I needed a proper reverse box as my drive slopes down towards the garage and I would never get the car out with a starter motor reverse - or so people with them have told me

Or someone with one will be along in a minute to tell me - I am talking a load of tosh!
I'd call someone who fits them such as the KC workshop or z-cars and get a first hand response. The ones I've seen are very strong with a lot of grunt - the limit being how long the battery lasts (which is ages). If you think how a starter motor will pull a car weighing 1.5 tons along until the battery dies, then I'm sure it'll cope with a 450kg KC. As I said though, speak to someone who fits them into their kits.

Personally I would never have a mech box in a BEC after the problems I had with mine.