2.9l 24V Cosworth in an M-chassis?

2.9l 24V Cosworth in an M-chassis?

Author
Discussion

pelsen

Original Poster:

12 posts

226 months

Wednesday 30th August 2006
quotequote all
I don't think the existing exhaust on the Essex is standard, the manifolds are stainless and looks very nice.
The problem may be the carburation, I changed the pump cam on the Holley 390 yesterday, and that was a step in the right direction. Shall continue testing with a larger pump nozzle today. The Holley sits on a Swaymar inlet.
The gas mileage with the Holley has been very good, but probably too lean on acceleration.

BTW, a Scorpio 24V went for £275 on Ebay yesterday.

davidy

4,459 posts

285 months

Wednesday 30th August 2006
quotequote all
pelsen

The stainless exhaust may 'look' very nice but does it flow well?

Perhaps someone could post some pictures of the Tony Law/Ric Wood exhaust and you will see what we mean. Its a real bunch of bananas affair and very effective.

I no longer have my car and have no pictures of the exhaust

davidy

GAjon

3,737 posts

214 months

Wednesday 30th August 2006
quotequote all
I've got some pictures if you can let me know how to post them or let me have your e-mail address i'll send them.
There's no magic in how these manifolds make a difference, if you are getting your engine to breath in deeper you've got to let it breath out!

John.

adrian@

4,314 posts

283 months

Wednesday 30th August 2006
quotequote all
I'm glad you said that John...(but, I don't know how to attach pictures either)I went to my storage container and found 3 !!! sets but they just look like a piles of bent tubes when they are not attached to the engine.
Adrian



Edited by adrian@ on Wednesday 30th August 12:44

heightswitch

6,318 posts

251 months

Wednesday 30th August 2006
quotequote all
A Holley 390 is a very big carb for a 3.0 essex engine???

N.

GAjon

3,737 posts

214 months

Wednesday 30th August 2006
quotequote all
Just seeing if I can do this



adrian@

4,314 posts

283 months

Wednesday 30th August 2006
quotequote all
Hi John, All, The setup you have are different to my setup as the No1 and No4 bore pipes go down and out through the triangulation of the chassis then join back up with the 3 into one, giving more air space around the oil filter and engine mountings.
John.....give me a call tomorrow, as I have a rear vented disc setup sitting on the bench in the workshop.
Adrian

sybaseian

1,826 posts

276 months

Thursday 31st August 2006
quotequote all
adrian@ said:
I'm glad you said that John...(but, I don't know how to attach pictures either)I went to my storage container and found 3 !!! sets but they just look like a piles of bent tubes when they are not attached to the engine.
Adrian



Edited by adrian@ on Wednesday 30th August 12:44


Adrian,

email the pictures and I'll stick them on here.

Ian

davidy

4,459 posts

285 months

Thursday 31st August 2006
quotequote all
Adrian

Mine was the same as GAjon's (being a copy it would be!) More space around the engine mount (nearside) would be good, as I had to take a small amount off the metal of the engine mount when fitting. I also agree about the oil filter, must 'most' people running this kind of system would have an aditional oil cooler and therefore have the option of a remote filter (which you can mount the right way up, therefore not pissing oil over your lovely clean engine bay at oil change time. I just had a remote filter as my engine always seemed to run quite cool.

Are yours based around the ones in Leon's brown car as that was different to mine/GAjon's ??

davidy

adrian@

4,314 posts

283 months

Thursday 31st August 2006
quotequote all
Yes David, The system impressed me and having seen both I opted to stock the easier fitting version. When I find time I will get some photo's posted...I too saw the photo's for dummy post. Adrian