The Official Bahrain GP Thread***SPOILERS***

The Official Bahrain GP Thread***SPOILERS***

Author
Discussion

FourWheelDrift

88,557 posts

285 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
Part of me wants the race disrupted then unable to restart (no one hurt or anything like that) just enough to make Ecclestone look the fool he is. If he's there of course and not watching his new women running in the London marathon as he's promised her, gives him a good excuse to not be about in Bahrain though when the trouble starts.

Eric Mc

122,058 posts

266 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Life Saab Itch said:
I thought it was just money put up to start McLaren Automotive?

I don't think any money has gone to McLaren Racing.
http://www.crash.net/f1/news/57608/1/bahrain_royal...

McLaren have since bought back Daimler (Mercedes) 40% share. Current shares are - Mumtalakat Holding Company currently holding 50%, and Ron Dennis and the TAG Group holding 25% each
And TAG is owned by the Saudi Royal Family. So McLaren is essentially an Islamic/Arabic team. I wonder what dear old Bruce would think?

FourWheelDrift

88,557 posts

285 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
TAG is part owned by Mansour Ojeh (born in France to a Syrian born Saudi father) and French multi-national Louis Vuitton Moët Hennessy. The Saudi Royal Family don't own any of it.

elster

17,517 posts

211 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
y2blade said:
Rich_W said:
My only concern is if some protesters get on the track. Like that idiot did at Silverstone a few years back (who also fked up the Olympic marathon as well. The !)

If a McLaren hit and inevitably killed a protestor on the track (and the driver!) that would be a disaster.

Time will tell.

On a slightly different note.
Qaulifying is on Saturday afternoon at 17:20 to 18:40
Race is on Sunday afternoon at 17:00 to 18:20

1) What chance do I have of avoiding the result that long!
2) Why is the Qualy show the same length as the race!

Edited by Rich_W on Sunday 15th April 17:28
are you sure about the broadcast times?

I've got them showing as lunchtime Sat and Sunday!
Here are the actual times Local


Fri 20 April 2012
Practice 1 10:00 - 11:30
Practice 2 14:00 - 15:30

Sat 21 April 2012
Practice 3 11:00 - 12:00
Qualifying 14:00

Sun 22 April 2012
Race 15:00


and UK Times


Fri 20 April 2012
Practice 1 08:00 - 09:30
Practice 2 12:00 - 13:30

Sat 21 April 2012
Practice 3 09:00 - 10:00

Qualifying 12:00

Sun 22 April 2012
Race 13:00

aryastark

170 posts

150 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
And TAG is owned by the Saudi Royal Family. So McLaren is essentially an Islamic/Arabic team. I wonder what dear old Bruce would think?
He'd probably be grateful as if it had been a british run company, they'd probably be bankrupt by now, just like the rest of the motor industry in the UK.

pingu393

7,824 posts

206 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
Now I know why Sauber are part sponsored by Oerlikon.

Rich_W

12,548 posts

213 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
sleep envy said:
Rich_W said:
If a McLaren hit and inevitably killed a protestor on the track (and the driver!) that would be a disaster.
why only McL?
As an example smile

The gutter press headlines would say "McLaren Mercedes kills protester" a PR disaster for McL and MB. Not what happened of course, but it owuld be too late. You'd potentially see MB dealers around the world getting torched by idiots in "revenge" rolleyes

y2blade said:
are you sure about the broadcast times?

I've got them showing as lunchtime Sat and Sunday!
Talking about poor person TV smile

DanDC5

18,810 posts

168 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
Well seeing a few of the tweets from some F1 journalists tonight the question as to why F1 is going there is only going to be asked again and again this week.

Ian Parkes posted a couple of pics on his arrival and the journalists ended up in the middle of a potential riot with a few people holding petrol bombs, and also ended up with a nice taste of tear gas...

Edited by DanDC5 on Monday 16th April 23:49

K50 DEL

9,237 posts

229 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
The drivers haven't even gone straight there..... most are in Dubai at the moment, not heading to Bahrain until much closer to the race.
Unusual for back to back race weekends.

Life Saab Itch

Original Poster:

37,068 posts

189 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
K50 DEL said:
The drivers haven't even gone straight there..... most are in Dubai at the moment, not heading to Bahrain until much closer to the race.
Unusual for back to back race weekends.
Who plays piano? Last time it was Elio De Angelis and Gilles Villeneuve playing show tunes....

Eric Mc

122,058 posts

266 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
It is and will continue to be a PR disaster for F1 and only bad things can flow from the decision to race.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
It is and will continue to be a PR disaster for F1 and only bad things can flow from the decision to race.
We can only hope. If they need this much security in place to hold the race, its a clear sign that the countries political position is too unstable. At least if the race does go ahead, the protestors can also get some more tv coverage and their opinions will be heard by millions.

I just know that I will see Ecclescake on the telly making light of the whole situation saying something like "oh yes, there are some silly people intent on causing a disrption etc etc" and end up throwing something heavy at the tv as he sits there being wined and dined by the Crown Prince.... Ecclescake saying "i have friends who live there and they say its totally safe" is like Roman Abramovich saying "I have friends in London who say the economy is fine"

good article on TIME blog: http://keepingscore.blogs.time.com/2012/04/17/as-p...

snorkel sucker

2,662 posts

204 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
pablo said:
Ecclescake saying "I have friends who live there and they say its totally safe" is like Roman Abramovich saying "I have friends in London who say the economy is fine"
Spot on. Absolutely.

P-Jay

10,579 posts

192 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
I also have a terrible feeling about this race.

I don't think the teams or fans have anything to fear from the protesters, they're not mindless rioters or western hating terrorists. They’d just quite like some rights in their country.

They haven't and won't get a better opportunity to let the wider world see their protest, so they'll be out in force, and the Bahrainis will do anything to keep them away from the track and TV cameras. I expect bloodshed.


I see someone's put Damon Hill back in his box "everyone should just get on with their lives" apart from the people who were killed and the ones who sit in prison without charge I guess. Go back to strolling around the Sulks and Malls, just try to duck the flying tear gas cans and hope the Saudi Army don't turn up again and start gunning down unarmed protestors.

But as long as we can have a boring race that represents what's wrong with F1 these days.

Edited by P-Jay on Tuesday 17th April 09:48

Fire99

9,844 posts

230 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
Regardless of how safe it is for those involved in F1, F1 is a huge 'machine' with massive worldwide coverage. F1 has the ability to make a standpoint and IMO they should. Bahrain has an awful situation going on and regardless of fault, needs big hitters (non military) from the outside to push for change.

Bahrain GP should not go ahead.

Life Saab Itch

Original Poster:

37,068 posts

189 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
Fire99 said:
Regardless of how safe it is for those involved in F1, F1 is a huge 'machine' with massive worldwide coverage. F1 has the ability to make a standpoint and IMO they should. Bahrain has an awful situation going on and regardless of fault, needs big hitters (non military) from the outside to push for change.

Bahrain GP should not go ahead.
Agreed.

Unfortunately morals etc are not high on Brother Bernard's agenda.


It's getting awfully last minute. I can see everyone turning up and being in a muddle on friday.


To misquote Charlie Brooker: "it'll be a fk-up in a fkery."

Fire99

9,844 posts

230 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
Life Saab Itch said:
Agreed.

Unfortunately morals etc are not high on Brother Bernard's agenda.


It's getting awfully last minute. I can see everyone turning up and being in a muddle on friday.


To misquote Charlie Brooker: "it'll be a fk-up in a fkery."
Agree with this too. frown

Gene Vincent

4,002 posts

159 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
Fire99 said:
Regardless of how safe it is for those involved in F1, F1 is a huge 'machine' with massive worldwide coverage. F1 has the ability to make a standpoint and IMO they should. Bahrain has an awful situation going on and regardless of fault, needs big hitters (non military) from the outside to push for change.

Bahrain GP should not go ahead.
I find Ecclestones persona grating, to say the very least. I disagree with almost every utterance he makes.

Except on this.

On this matter he is right, F1 must not be swayed by Politics, it must be seen as apolitical.

Those calling for the sport to become some vanguard of political unrest or new thinking are effectively pointing the way to the demise of the sport as it comes under the sway of Politics.

Bernie is usually something of a tt, but I find myself agreeing with him this time, bloody annoying.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
Gene Vincent said:
On this matter he is right, F1 must not be swayed by Politics, it must be seen as apolitical.
F1 has always been political. F1 just pick and choose when and to what extent, didnt the powers that be choose to boycott South Africa in the 80s?

If they dont race in Bahrain, F1 is seen as becoming involved in a political situation and many would say they are supporting the protestors, if they do race they are seen as supporting the current rulers....

So whats different form 20011 only there is a lot more money at stake in 2012 and a global reputation for invetors and businesses...

and finally, in how many other countries would Coutnries ruler, in this case the Crown Prince, also be the CEO of a race circuit?..... I hope all Bernie's dealing come back to bite him one day.

StevieBee

12,930 posts

256 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
Gene Vincent said:
I find Ecclestones persona grating, to say the very least. I disagree with almost every utterance he makes.

Except on this.

On this matter he is right, F1 must not be swayed by Politics, it must be seen as apolitical.

Those calling for the sport to become some vanguard of political unrest or new thinking are effectively pointing the way to the demise of the sport as it comes under the sway of Politics.

Bernie is usually something of a tt, but I find myself agreeing with him this time, bloody annoying.
I'm the other way round on this one.

My view is that F1 is an elitist sport. It costs a stupid amount to gain the point at which participation is possible, a very high amount of money to spectate and in some cases, a lot of money to even watch on TV.

Elitism is at the heart of the issue in Bahrain - the fact that there are two classes; the ruling elite and the working class. Unlike in the UK for example where regardless of your birth origin, nothing stands in anyone's way of attaining success, indeed such progression is encouraged and supported (Lewis Hamilton for example), in much of the Arab world, the opposite is the case where any attempt to progress through society is at best; suppressed, but most usually, banned.

The unintended consequence of F1 going to Bahrain is that it is technically supporting the country's dictatorial elite. The lower classes cannot afford to attend the race, let alone have any ideas of their children actually one day participating in it.

I fully support the fact that F1 or any sport should be a-political but to do so, means it cannot be seen to support either side of a political argument. For this reason, far from acting as a galvanising influence, I fear it will create further divide. This, in my opinion demonstrates a lack of social awareness that the sport could well do to avoid.

F1 whilst hugely popular, exists in a world that is increasingly hostile towards it. For many it is seen as an example of wonton consumerism, social inequality and of course the perceived negative environmental impacts it has. Of course the reality is far removed from the perceptions (which themselves are open to much debate) but the strength of influence that those that support these concerns have should never be underestimated. Sometimes, attack is the best form of defence and F1 could do with reviewing its CSR policies before others force them to do so.

I'd not want anyone to think I wear sandals, read The Guardian, live in Islington or eat lentils whilst hugging a tree. I'm simply describing the sad reality of the world we live in.