F1 returning to Paul Ricard, alternating with Spa

F1 returning to Paul Ricard, alternating with Spa

Author
Discussion

Eric Mc

122,010 posts

265 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Sorry, the conversation is now too dumb for words so I'll let you do some research on the subject and perhaps I might re-engage when you post evidence that you know what you are talking about.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Sorry, the conversation is now too dumb for words so I'll let you do some research on the subject and perhaps I might re-engage when you post evidence that you know what you are talking about.
I think you'll find my own post provides the answer already.

Eric Mc

122,010 posts

265 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
djstevec said:
Eric Mc said:
Sorry, the conversation is now too dumb for words so I'll let you do some research on the subject and perhaps I might re-engage when you post evidence that you know what you are talking about.
I think you'll find my own post provides the answer already.
Then why are you acting as Mr Stupid then?

If you know the answer, why don't you just say it.

Wills2

22,804 posts

175 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
djstevec said:
Eric Mc said:
Sorry, the conversation is now too dumb for words so I'll let you do some research on the subject and perhaps I might re-engage when you post evidence that you know what you are talking about.
I think you'll find my own post provides the answer already.
Then why are you acting as Mr Stupid then?

If you know the answer, why don't you just say it.
I don't know the answer either, is that good enough for you to share? smile

I would imagine building the thing would be the biggest cost?

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
djstevec said:
Eric Mc said:
Sorry, the conversation is now too dumb for words so I'll let you do some research on the subject and perhaps I might re-engage when you post evidence that you know what you are talking about.
I think you'll find my own post provides the answer already.
Then why are you acting as Mr Stupid then?

If you know the answer, why don't you just say it.
Because you clearly hadn't read my post before asking me a stupid question. As Bernie say, "What a silly question, I'll give you a silly answer"

FourWheelDrift

88,510 posts

284 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Paul Ricard can apparently create 167 different circuit layouts so I wonder what one they wil use for the race, or will Mr Tilke be let loose to make yet another circuit change.

PDF of the circuit layouts here - http://www.circuitpaulricard.com/views/public/pdf/...

Circuit layout 1A-V2 is my preferred by very unlikely layout.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Paul Ricard can apparently create 167 different circuit layouts so I wonder what one they wil use for the race, or will Mr Tilke be let loose to make yet another circuit change.

PDF of the circuit layouts here - http://www.circuitpaulricard.com/views/public/pdf/...
Yeah I kinda got bored after about layout 8 with one corner different to the one before.

Will Bernie be let loose with the sprinkler switch tho! wink

TheHeretic

73,668 posts

255 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
1A-SC - Has a high speed snake after the start finish and the end of the long straight has a sharp corner, hopefully giving chances for out braking.

Eric Mc

122,010 posts

265 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
Eric Mc said:
djstevec said:
Eric Mc said:
Sorry, the conversation is now too dumb for words so I'll let you do some research on the subject and perhaps I might re-engage when you post evidence that you know what you are talking about.
I think you'll find my own post provides the answer already.
Then why are you acting as Mr Stupid then?

If you know the answer, why don't you just say it.
I don't know the answer either, is that good enough for you to share? smile

I would imagine building the thing would be the biggest cost?
Aha - a sensible person at last.

Spa, as a racing circuit, was "built" almost 80 years ago and has had capital expenditure incurred on various changes over its long life. Capital expenditure is never looked on as a simple cost and is instead amortised over the expected useful life of the capital items purchased. Therefore, capital costs are "depreciated" over time and it is these annual depreciation costs which are offset against annual income - not the full capital costs.

The single biggest expense item which is outside the control of any circuit is the fee CVC choses to charge the venue.

So, when Bernie claims that a circuit canot afford to host a race, that is due to decisions HE has made as to how much he is going to charge them for the privilege of hosting that race.
THAT is the reason why we are seeing a shift to countries where the state is prepared to pay CVC's costs.
And why does CVC need to charge so much? Because it was funded by a reckless loan arrangement which they are struggling to satisfy and have been hovering on the verge of bankruptcy gfor a number of years.
The recent anouncement that F1 was being "floated" is an attempt by CVC to escape from the onerous finacial obligations they are struggling to meet.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Wills2 said:
Eric Mc said:
djstevec said:
Eric Mc said:
Sorry, the conversation is now too dumb for words so I'll let you do some research on the subject and perhaps I might re-engage when you post evidence that you know what you are talking about.
I think you'll find my own post provides the answer already.
Then why are you acting as Mr Stupid then?

If you know the answer, why don't you just say it.
I don't know the answer either, is that good enough for you to share? smile

I would imagine building the thing would be the biggest cost?
Aha - a sensible person at last.

Spa, as a racing circuit, was "built" almost 80 years ago and has had capital expenditure incurred on various changes over its long life. Capital expenditure is never looked on as a simple cost and is instead amortised over the expected useful life of the capital items purchased. Therefore, capital costs are "depreciated" over time and it is these annual depreciation costs which are offset against annual income - not the full capital costs.

The single biggest expense item which is outside the control of any circuit is the fee CVC choses to charge the venue.

So, when Bernie claims that a circuit canot afford to host a race, that is due to decisions HE has made as to how much he is going to charge them for the privilege of hosting that race.
THAT is the reason why we are seeing a shift to countries where the state is prepared to pay CVC's costs.
And why does CVC need to charge so much? Because it was funded by a reckless loan arrangement which they are struggling to satisfy and have been hovering on the verge of bankruptcy gfor a number of years.
The recent anouncement that F1 was being "floated" is an attempt by CVC to escape from the onerous finacial obligations they are struggling to meet.
I'll paraphrase that for you,

"All in all it boils down to BE to reduce race fees,"


Eric Mc

122,010 posts

265 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
That would be nice smile
Sadly, he's trapped by CVC's desparate need to increase its income. If it doesn't, the whole pack of cards comes crashing down.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
That would be nice smile
Sadly, he's trapped by CVC's desparate need to increase its income. If it doesn't, the whole pack of cards comes crashing down.
And (shocker) I agree with you, BUT if this Spa/Ricard deal keeps Spa on a bi-annual basis over no Spa GP at all, then Im as happy as the situation allows.

Eric Mc

122,010 posts

265 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
It's the best of a bad situation - that's all.

I'd prefer one of the nonentity tracks to be dropped to make way for Paul Ricard.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
It's the best of a bad situation - that's all.

I'd prefer one of the nonentity tracks to be dropped to make way for Paul Ricard.
I would prefer it too...Valencia probably isn't going to be around much longer anyway....but Valencia for PR would still mean no Spa at all...that's the whole point.

JonRB

74,539 posts

272 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Well, at least Bernie isn't going to be constantly moaning about the circuit and dissing the owners since he owns the circuit.
Not that this is a conflict of interest or anything.

Pistachio

1,116 posts

190 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Panclan said:
Doesn't Bernie own Paul Ricard?
Yes. He also or rather his wife owned all the refreshment licences at Spa as well.
Pretty track mind with all those lines

Lost soul

8,712 posts

182 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Mark_Karting said:
Bernie Ecclestone has confirmed to L’Équipe that the French Grand Prix will be returning to Formula 1 from 2013 onwards. The race, to be staged at Paul Ricard for the first time since 1990, will be alternating with the Belgian Grand Prix at Spa.

http://www.gpupdate.net/en/f1-news/277769/ecclesto...
What a bummer , Spa is The circuit as far as i am concerned die ecclestone die

Eric Mc

122,010 posts

265 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Lost soul said:
What a bummer , Spa is The circuit as far as i am concerned die ecclestone die
One can but hope.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
"You don't have as much obscure knowledge as me, so I'll call you an idiot."

Another great PH thread turned sour.

- Generic I hate Bernie comment here -

Lost soul

8,712 posts

182 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
MSTRBKR said:
"You don't have as much obscure knowledge as me, so I'll call you an idiot."

Another great PH thread turned sour.

- Generic I hate Bernie comment here -
What the hell are you on about