What would YOU do to change rallying?

What would YOU do to change rallying?

Author
Discussion

davepoth

29,395 posts

199 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
SystemParanoia said:
rallying should have free engine choice.

just use inlet restrictors to level the playing field
Don't even bother with that - restricted tyres to control the grip. More power, more sliding. A simple and winning equation.

FiF

44,050 posts

251 months

Thursday 18th October 2012
quotequote all
PhillipM said:
velocemitch said:
Might do from the inside of it though, it would bring a lot more competitors in.
Would it? You generally find the more regulations a sport has to keep things close to standard the more expensive it becomes as soon as there are proffesional teams involved, because they spend absolute fortunes on R+D for iterative design that the rest of the field can't hope to match.
That is actually a fair point, anecdotal example.

Take the Production class RS2000 in my profile pic. We had two sets of suspension tarmac and forest, both outwardly identical and parts off the shelf. Just that one set of parts were chosen to be at one end of the manufacturing tolerance band, and the others at the opposite end. Sort of best description I can give in a single line.

So on the first day of the RAC, where almost all the stages were spectator stages and tarmac with a couple of very smooth forest, then the tarmac suspension went on. Service halt before the overnight stop, everything changed to the "forest" setup. Still standard, but it made a measurable difference in ride height and performance.

Twincam16

27,646 posts

258 months

Thursday 18th October 2012
quotequote all
davepoth said:
SystemParanoia said:
rallying should have free engine choice.

just use inlet restrictors to level the playing field
Don't even bother with that - restricted tyres to control the grip. More power, more sliding. A simple and winning equation.
The RGT class is power-unlimited but 2WD only, so I guess this balances it out.

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

198 months

Thursday 18th October 2012
quotequote all
Twincam16 said:
davepoth said:
SystemParanoia said:
rallying should have free engine choice.

just use inlet restrictors to level the playing field
Don't even bother with that - restricted tyres to control the grip. More power, more sliding. A simple and winning equation.
The RGT class is power-unlimited but 2WD only, so I guess this balances it out.
close... but RGT is tarmac only frown

Twincam16

27,646 posts

258 months

Thursday 18th October 2012
quotequote all
SystemParanoia said:
Twincam16 said:
davepoth said:
SystemParanoia said:
rallying should have free engine choice.

just use inlet restrictors to level the playing field
Don't even bother with that - restricted tyres to control the grip. More power, more sliding. A simple and winning equation.
The RGT class is power-unlimited but 2WD only, so I guess this balances it out.
close... but RGT is tarmac only frown
I know, but as it picks up in popularity (which, lets face it, it will), I can see the rules being altered so they can compete for their own trophy.

I think the FIA are trying to stop them turning into Group B mentalmobiles, but given that they have to be production-based and 2WD, it'll no doubt rein itself in, plus crowd-control should have a natural restraining effect too.

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

198 months

Thursday 18th October 2012
quotequote all
sounds like good stuff then biggrin

if they can publish spring rates, shock rates, ride-hight and geometry settings for the cars after they finish for the year that would be awesome too, as us mere mortals will have a good starting point for our regular cars to turn them into true B road blasters!


...thats never going to happen is it? hehe