What F1 TV coverage do you prefer?

What F1 TV coverage do you prefer?

Poll: What F1 TV coverage do you prefer?

Total Members Polled: 329

BBC: 55%
SKY: 33%
I Like Both: 12%
Author
Discussion

Melman Giraffe

Original Poster:

6,759 posts

218 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
So we are well into the season and we have had a chance to watch both sky and the BBC. Which coverage do you prefer?

For me its the BBC. I can't stand the tool who fronts sky!

oyster

12,595 posts

248 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
I don't have Sky but voted for liking both because I have seen 3 live races on Sky and their coverage is not too bad. Plus they do have Brundle, which is their biggest asset.

If EJ and Jake moved to Sky their team would be perfect.

telecat

8,528 posts

241 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
I don't have Sky now but when I did I even preferred the ITV Football coverage to that of Sky's. The Grandiose self importance and trivial content of the coverage produced by them is so annoying.

TheHeretic

73,668 posts

255 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
Both. The BBC has the familiar faces you are used to, which is hard to compete with, but sky has some very good technical programs that Brundle seems to enjoy doing, as well as more historical stuff as well, (old races, the legends segment, and so on). They both get the same feed, so all square on that score.

Commentary, both are OK. I prefer listening to Brundle, than DC, so like sky's commentary, but one is no better than the other.

HustleRussell

24,691 posts

160 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
BBC at the moment but I don't like the direction it's going in... rumours of even more of the crew moving on/defecting to Sky.

Sexual Chocolate

1,583 posts

144 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
I was suitable outraged when Sky picked it up however I am really liking their coverage.

TheHeretic

73,668 posts

255 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
telecat said:
I don't have Sky now but when I did I even preferred the ITV Football coverage to that of Sky's. The Grandiose self importance and trivial content of the coverage produced by them is so annoying.
So you have no base to judge the F1 coverage then? confused

I wonder how many will vote for reasons other than the actual coverage?

PH lurker

1,301 posts

157 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
TheHeretic said:
So you have no base to judge the F1 coverage then? confused

I wonder how many will vote for reasons other than the actual coverage?
I suppose I did really, without thinking about why I was voting for BBC. I'm guilty, sorry. boxedin

MrKipling43

5,788 posts

216 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
Sky coverage is generally pretty pants. Lots of it, but pretty low quality. They just can't hold a candle to BBC production.

Also, Lazenby has no soul. I said as much on Twitter recently, and he followed me. Very weird.

DavRal

11 posts

155 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
BBC is far better for me. Sky has its fancy graphics, but i can't stand Lazenby.

The big worry is who BBC are going to get in for next season to replace Jake Humphrey, cause he's off to host Premiership football on BT.

stemll

4,096 posts

200 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
oyster said:
I don't have Sky but voted for liking both because I have seen 3 live races on Sky and their coverage is not too bad. Plus they do have Brundle, which is their biggest asset.

If EJ and Jake moved to Sky their team would be perfect.
Given that Jake is leaving the BBC to front football on BT Vision that seems unlikely. EJ is the reason I voted Sky.

Nick1point9

3,917 posts

180 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
I prefer the BBC coverage as I think the sky coverage is too "Football Focus" derived for me, its too in your face techy.

But I voted for sky, because poor coverage is better than no coverage, which is the case half the time with the BBC.

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

152 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
In terms of the races I cannot really choose between the two.

Much of the difference in the build up for Sky is just tinsel and shiney things rather than anything of actual substance though.

ETA: Based on watching 3 on Sky, so there may be more I have missed where something amazing did go down.

Podie

46,630 posts

275 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
DavRal said:
BBC is far better for me. Sky has its fancy graphics, but i can't stand Lazenby.

The big worry is who BBC are going to get in for next season to replace Jake Humphrey, cause he's off to host Premiership football on BT.
The graphics are too cheesy. Johnny Herbert and Doris pretend to touch graphics to make them full screen - it's just cringe worthy.

scubadude

2,618 posts

197 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
For me its Sky- because I can see it all live and Brundle is easy on the ear....

That said its not perfect- Lazenby needs to be fired pronto and the shouty twonk with Brundle in commentary can't be far behind him IMO.

If they need more budget the Sky Pad nonsense can go too, the bint isn't bad but serves no real purpose.


Still dissapointed at the beeb for the whole affair- can't blame Sky for picking up a dropped ball, its not perfect but its better than nothing.

oyster

12,595 posts

248 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
stemll said:
oyster said:
I don't have Sky but voted for liking both because I have seen 3 live races on Sky and their coverage is not too bad. Plus they do have Brundle, which is their biggest asset.

If EJ and Jake moved to Sky their team would be perfect.
Given that Jake is leaving the BBC to front football on BT Vision that seems unlikely. EJ is the reason I voted Sky.
I never get why people don't like EJ. What's not to like? He adds an extra dimension in that he's a former team owner, so it's not just ex-drivers presenting as it is on Sky (and Sky employ plenty of ex-managers in their football coverage).

Streps

2,446 posts

166 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
I don't really mind anymore.
I'll watch it on BBC for the HD (I cant get sky F1 HD on virgin media)
But i enjoy the F1 shows on Sky..
And they show season reviews..


Crofty is just too shouty now though frown
His screeching voice is just st!
Shame as he was fantastic on 5live.

TheArchitect

1,238 posts

179 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
Both are fine, I'm still not sold on the sky lead presenter but I certainly don't dislike him. However I would prefer everything to be on BBC so I don't have to go online to watch the F1, and wouldn't have to pay a premium to watch it.

BTW how much motorsport is actually available on sky as when I last looks it all seemed to be on espn etc which would require another subscription!

Nick1point9

3,917 posts

180 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
TheArchitect said:
Both are fine, I'm still not sold on the sky lead presenter but I certainly don't dislike him. However I would prefer everything to be on BBC so I don't have to go online to watch the F1, and wouldn't have to pay a premium to watch it.

BTW how much motorsport is actually available on sky as when I last looks it all seemed to be on espn etc which would require another subscription!
Most of the GP2, GP3 and Porsche Carrera cup is on there, sometimes it need recording at funny hours but I think it may even all be on there

Salom

230 posts

176 months

Thursday 4th October 2012
quotequote all
I haven’t seen any races on SKY so can’t really comment, but I have to say DC is starting to grate a bit, it’s not what he says, it’s how he says it, I tweeted him during the summer break , ‘David, we love you, but why do you commentate as if you’re straining for a st?’