Saab 900 T16S "The Exxon Valdez"

Saab 900 T16S "The Exxon Valdez"

Author
Discussion

99t

Original Poster:

1,004 posts

209 months

Friday 3rd May 2013
quotequote all
The Jolly Todger said:
Looks cracking. I miss mine, such a good looking car.

Any news on the test?
Oh yes! biggrin

Few advisories but nothing that wasn't already on the to-do list.

99t

Original Poster:

1,004 posts

209 months

Sunday 2nd February 2014
quotequote all
Bit of an overdue update, although to be fair there hasn't really been much to report - the old girl has been getting used quite infrequently, but has been 100% reliable and remains a joy to chuck around!

Spent a little bit of money in January sorting a couple of niggles:-

Bought this



to replace this which had long since lost its leather covering and even the plastic underneath was wearing smooth!! (the grooves are where the seams in the leather once sat, in case you were wondering, and didn't really add to its comfort in daily use..)



I expecting a fight removing the old knob, "rock and pull" the supplied instructions helpfully suggested, so when it came off stupidly easily whilst I was still applying maximum upward strength, I'm surprised I didn't end up in the back seat with a dislocated shoulder!!


Since the last update, the mid-range boominess resulting from deleting the centre exhaust box had become a steadily increasing source of irritation - and I felt was out of keeping with the overall image of the car, so it was once more out with the axle stands...



Old and new..



Checked the underside whilst up in the air - the old girl is mostly very clean, although there are one or two areas where work will definitely be needed in the not too distant future



And the new downpipe / cente box section fitted - it won't be that shiny for long!!



Result - much quieter, sound like a proper Saab again, rather than some boy-racer special. If the new section is more restrictive, it certainly isn't obvious from the drivers seat - with the cool air today the APC was allowing the boost needle well into the red zone and she was pulling rather well!! smile

NiceCupOfTea

25,289 posts

251 months

Sunday 2nd February 2014
quotequote all
Careful with the centre box - one of the reasons I went with a 3" JT exhaust on mine was the lack of centre box and it was a breath of fresh air being able to get over speed bumps without scraping the exhaust...

99t

Original Poster:

1,004 posts

209 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
Cheers, yes will try to remember, although I don't think it actually hangs particularly low - ground clearance looks fine for all but perhaps the most vicious of speed bumps... (hopefully not famous last words!!)

99t

Original Poster:

1,004 posts

209 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
Boo!! Failed the MOT frown

But only on one of the two number plate lights not working. Garage stuck a new bulb in and it still didn't work.

Hopefully a minor fettle at the weekend will see it right.

Not picked the old girl up yet, but they did comment that there are quite a few advisories that they will go through when I call in!! yikes

ManFromDelmonte

2,742 posts

180 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
99t said:
Boo!! Failed the MOT frown

But only on one of the two number plate lights not working. Garage stuck a new bulb in and it still didn't work.

Hopefully a minor fettle at the weekend will see it right.

Not picked the old girl up yet, but they did comment that there are quite a few advisories that they will go through when I call in!! yikes
I get jealous every time this thread pops up.

Advisories will probably be tyres and brakes (that's my prediction). Keep us updated smile

Truckosaurus

11,287 posts

284 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
On a related note I too owned a Saab name after a crashed oil tanker, it was a 9000 Carlsson known as the Amoco Cadiz.

Atterz

67 posts

144 months

Thursday 15th May 2014
quotequote all
I love it!

99t

Original Poster:

1,004 posts

209 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
Truckosaurus said:
On a related note I too owned a Saab name after a crashed oil tanker, it was a 9000 Carlsson known as the Amoco Cadiz.
biglaugh There must be something about them!!

99t

Original Poster:

1,004 posts

209 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
ManFromDelmonte said:
I get jealous every time this thread pops up.

Advisories will probably be tyres and brakes (that's my prediction). Keep us updated smile
Numberplate light now fixed, was a furry connector on the inside of the light block.

Pretty good guess on those advisories...
  • rear across axle brake pipe slightly corroded
  • offside rear brake hose slight corrosion to ferrules
  • nearside front brake hose slightly deteriorated
  • offside front tyre worn close to legal limit
  • nearside front tyre worn close to legal limit
plus
  • offside rear upper shock absorber slightly worn bush
  • nearside rear upper shock absorber slightly worn bush
  • rear silencer rubber mountings deteriorated
  • fuel filter banjo connections corroded
and it would be the EV without the traditional
  • oil leak!! smile

99t

Original Poster:

1,004 posts

209 months

Tuesday 3rd June 2014
quotequote all
In light of the the "minor" advisories (perished brake hoses, rusty fuel filter connections etc.) I decided to do some bodywork!!

Bottom of the tailgate has had some minor bubbling under the satin black wrap for as long as I've owned EV.



Peeling off the wrap. Note also the dodgy lacquer below the rear spoiler which will be sorted at the same time as it is the only poor paint on the car.



Hmm, pretty much as expected, better start cleaning it back...



yikes ... that may be a tad worse than expected!!





Better start cutting and welding then...



to be continued...

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 3rd June 2014
quotequote all
Eeeek!

Keep the updates coming, love these old Saabs. smile

99t

Original Poster:

1,004 posts

209 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
Ok, so only nine months later, that's actually not a bad update rate for me! paperbag

Removed the "whaletail" spoiler, fortunately not too grotty underneath.



If you've been following my 99 Turbo restoration thread you'll remember how bad these can be under the rear spolier



Anyway, happy that the tailgate wasn't scrap I shaped a repair section for the lower lip



Bit of welding, dressing and a thin skim of filler later..



.. and then I Dynaxed it to death



Started prepping for paint on the upper surface, metal quite wavy



Lots of high build



LOTS more high build



Surely it will flat back level now...? GRRRRRR!!!



Finally though it was ready for colour and lacquer. Waited a while and then flatted back. Came out ok for rattle cans applied outdoors.



Satin black wrap as per the factory on the lower section and re-assemble



Spoiler and badges to refit, plus a damn good clean needed but it is starting to look presentable again.



Repair costs:
Metal (from stock) but say £7
High build 750ml £14
Paint and lacquer £20
Satin wrap £6
Dynax, Electrox and welding wire from stock, say £10
My time, priceless!! smile


95Aero

603 posts

194 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
Looks fantastic, how much power do these have?

ManFromDelmonte

2,742 posts

180 months

Sunday 5th April 2015
quotequote all
Great to see it still going and looking good.

99t

Original Poster:

1,004 posts

209 months

Sunday 5th April 2015
quotequote all
95Aero said:
Looks fantastic, how much power do these have?
The "standard" T16 models were 175bhp from the factory, Carlsson and Ruby special editions had 185bhp. Doesn't sound much by current standards but the 900 isn't an especially heavy car and the mid-range urge is very addictive.

EV has a 185bhp "red box" APC (boost control electronics box). It is a common misconception that all red box APC are 185bhp whereas some are still 175bhp. The part number needs to be cross referenced to discover which variant it actually is.

That said, I am actually running a manual boost controller at the moment, wound out to cap the maximum boost to less than the APC would allow as the clutch had started slipping under maximum load and boost. The clutch is neither old or high miles but maybe it didn't escape contamination completely when I had the gearbox leak / clutch slave failures early on. I do have a new clutch to fit when I get round to it but didn't want to destroy the flywheel before then.








95Aero

603 posts

194 months

Sunday 5th April 2015
quotequote all
99t said:
The "standard" T16 models were 175bhp from the factory, Carlsson and Ruby special editions had 185bhp. Doesn't sound much by current standards but the 900 isn't an especially heavy car and the mid-range urge is very addictive.

EV has a 185bhp "red box" APC (boost control electronics box). It is a common misconception that all red box APC are 185bhp whereas some are still 175bhp. The part number needs to be cross referenced to discover which variant it actually is.

That said, I am actually running a manual boost controller at the moment, wound out to cap the maximum boost to less than the APC would allow as the clutch had started slipping under maximum load and boost. The clutch is neither old or high miles but maybe it didn't escape contamination completely when I had the gearbox leak / clutch slave failures early on. I do have a new clutch to fit when I get round to it but didn't want to destroy the flywheel before then.
Yeh bet it goes well with 185 bhp, guess it only weights 1200ish kg

MrMoonyMan

2,584 posts

211 months

Sunday 5th April 2015
quotequote all
Enjoying the thread 99t.

Great colour for one too.

I have just been out for the first run of the year in my (220hp) one and they are just huge fun.

I'd forgotten how nicely it handles too. Although, I must confess, I am now thinking an LSD would be a nice upgrade this year.

99t

Original Poster:

1,004 posts

209 months

Monday 6th July 2015
quotequote all
I have a good relationship with my local MOT place, they are a good bunch of guys who seem to have two descriptions when discussing the advisories:-

"it's just a little bit of surface rust / perished / tiny bit of play, maybe have a look at it before winter"

and

"it's not a fail but I would definitely sort it sooner rather than later"

which I have always taken to mean the item is hanging on to legality / safety by a thread and it's only that the guys know I do my own maintenance and generally do keep well on top of stuff that they haven't failed it.

EV had quite a few advisories last time around and most fell into the former category but the tester's facial expression when describing the front brake hose being perished meant it definitely fell into the latter category.

To my shame then that 12 months later I hadn't got around to looking at it. Although I've covered less than 1,000 miles in EV since the last test, that's no excuse, must do better.

So the last couple of weekends I have been working through the list of advisories from last time, replacing exhaust rubbers, treating and painting a short and lightly corroded section of brake pipe on the rear axle, cleaning up and treating cosmetic rust on brake and fuel line ferrules etc. Thrilling stuff.

Due to the lack of miles covered the tyres are still close to the limit but legal so they'll keep until I see if the test reveals any major new horrors.

The upper rear shock bushes are still perished and may now be a fail, we'll see. However the upper shock nuts definitely aren't going to undo so replacing the bushes will mean cutting off and replacing the otherwise perfectly serviceable shocks.

The front brake hose wasn't as bad as feared, but it certainly wasn't great.



Good excuse to test out my flare nut spanners, these were recently picked up as B&Q clearance items, so reduced to buttons each. Perfect fit and made the job so much easier, no chance of rounding the connections off.



New hose fitted and brakes bled.



Noted that the potentially troublesome drive shaft tunnel area still looks pleasingly solid



Time to book the MOT now...

99t

Original Poster:

1,004 posts

209 months

Friday 10th July 2015
quotequote all
Another year, another ticket smile

List of advisories has reduced to:-

Front tyres
Rear brake pipe slight corrosion (not sure where but I must have missed cleaning up a bit) and
Oil leak (which is a very slight weep from the cam-cover)

Happy days!! beer