Discussion
Had to drop some parts off at the paint shop this morning so grabbed some quick snaps whilst there!
Hopefully all the paint work will be done in the next few weeks and then the job of converting to M3 running gear will commence.
Hopefully all the paint work will be done in the next few weeks and then the job of converting to M3 running gear will commence.
Edited by E91M3 on Monday 23 December 13:32
Edited by E91M3 on Monday 23 December 20:54
Edited by E91M3 on Tuesday 24th December 17:43
E91M3 said:
I think the 260m are a great design and it took me some time to find a perfect set.
The graphite finish really goes well with Jerez Black.
yeah pretty rare to find now..... i managed to find a really good set and shoe horn them onto my z4m, only really worked due to my agreesive track setup vehicle ( these offsets are pretty agressive for the z4m, the front particularly...... they look awesome.... good choice!!The graphite finish really goes well with Jerez Black.
Captainawesome said:
This is (going to be) awesome. Good work. I have seen one completed before and it looked amazing.
Thanks for the feedback. Whilst the car is still away in the bodyshop I have been trying to source a suitable engine to go with the DCT gearbox I acquired last year. I decided to buy the following from a well known BMW breakers in the south west (who's service was superb by the way).
Anyway here are some photo's taken from the advert for the engine and poor M3 that it was sourced from (which was a 2011 car). The engine is practically new judging by the condition its in.
I will post some more photo's shortly of the other mechanical bits
Thanks
Noticed this car in my feed too - I wonder what happened to it, poor car
Very interesting project and love following the progress! Can't wait for more updates.
Very interesting project and love following the progress! Can't wait for more updates.
E91M3 said:
Thanks for the feedback.
Whilst the car is still away in the bodyshop I have been trying to source a suitable engine to go with the DCT gearbox I acquired last year. I decided to buy the following from a well known BMW breakers in the south west (who's service was superb by the way).
Anyway here are some photo's taken from the advert for the engine and poor M3 that it was sourced from (which was a 2011 car). The engine is practically new judging by the condition its in.
I will post some more photo's shortly of the other mechanical bits
Thanks
Whilst the car is still away in the bodyshop I have been trying to source a suitable engine to go with the DCT gearbox I acquired last year. I decided to buy the following from a well known BMW breakers in the south west (who's service was superb by the way).
Anyway here are some photo's taken from the advert for the engine and poor M3 that it was sourced from (which was a 2011 car). The engine is practically new judging by the condition its in.
I will post some more photo's shortly of the other mechanical bits
Thanks
Max_Torque said:
I'd assume, given the lack of impact damage, that the M3 was stolen recovered, and subsequently had it's chassis chopped to ensure (to the satisfaction of the insurance company) that the bodyshell could never be re-used (ie. break for parts only)
Why would you ruin a good shell regardless? Seems a total waste to mestuart-b said:
Why would you ruin a good shell regardless? Seems a total waste to me
You need to learn about your write-off categories...Category A: scrap only – Cat A cars should not be allowed back on the road, but their parts can be sold for recycling.
Category B: break for parts – Cat B cars are not allowed back on the road, but there will be some parts that can be removed and sold as spares. Its shell (the main component of the car) must be crushed.
Category C: repairable total loss – Cat C cars are allowed back on the road, as the damage is repairable, although the cost of repair is higher than the value of the car. The car must be subject to a Vehicle Identity Check (VIC).
Category D: repairable significant damage – Cat D cars are also allowed back on the road, because the damage can be repaired. Unlike Cat C, however, the repairs won’t cost more than the value of the car, but it is significant enough for the car to be written off.
Edited by Windymiller on Tuesday 28th January 17:27
Windymiller said:
You need to learn about your write-off categories...
Category A: scrap only – Cat A cars should not be allowed back on the road, but their parts can be sold for recycling.
Category B: break for parts – Cat B cars are not allowed back on the road, but there will be some parts that can be removed and sold as spares. Its shell (the main component of the car) must be crushed.
Category C: repairable total loss – Cat C cars are allowed back on the road, as the damage is repairable, although the cost of repair is higher than the value of the car. The car must be subject to a Vehicle Identity Check (VIC).
Category D: repairable significant damage – Cat D cars are also allowed back on the road, because the damage can be repaired. Unlike Cat C, however, the repairs won’t cost more than the value of the car, but it is significant enough for the car to be written off.
I know what the write off categories are, I was responding in context of the above postCategory A: scrap only – Cat A cars should not be allowed back on the road, but their parts can be sold for recycling.
Category B: break for parts – Cat B cars are not allowed back on the road, but there will be some parts that can be removed and sold as spares. Its shell (the main component of the car) must be crushed.
Category C: repairable total loss – Cat C cars are allowed back on the road, as the damage is repairable, although the cost of repair is higher than the value of the car. The car must be subject to a Vehicle Identity Check (VIC).
Category D: repairable significant damage – Cat D cars are also allowed back on the road, because the damage can be repaired. Unlike Cat C, however, the repairs won’t cost more than the value of the car, but it is significant enough for the car to be written off.
Edited by Windymiller on Tuesday 28th January 17:27
Max_Torque said:
I'd assume, given the lack of impact damage, that the M3 was stolen recovered, and subsequently had it's chassis chopped to ensure (to the satisfaction of the insurance company) that the bodyshell could never be re-used (ie. break for parts only)
Seeing as I've known many cars to be stolen and recovered, it seems odd, if no real damage, why this one was chopped.Gassing Station | Readers' Cars | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff