Ferrari F430 Spider

Author
Discussion

Shadow R1

3,800 posts

176 months

Tuesday 8th November 2016
quotequote all
Always look forward to an update on your threads, for details like the performance data. smile


mwstewart

Original Poster:

7,610 posts

188 months

Tuesday 8th November 2016
quotequote all
An update on performance data; I've been in dialogue with Jean-Claude from http://www.asphalte.ch which is a Swiss performance car site that weighs all of the cars it tests. I now have real world data to replace the factory brochure data for the 430, Scuderia, and 458, and: Wow! the factory data is not even representative! I am informed this is the norm by a wide range of manufacturers. McLaren stand out as being accurate.

The effect on the list is quite significant because the Spider models weigh a lot more than their brouchures suggest. In due course I will have my car corner weighted to verify my changes.

F430 Spider F1 CCM = 307.04 bhp/tonne
Kerb weight: 1606 kg ( validated)
Flywheel power: 493.1 bhp (Capristo dyno - avg. of multiple runs)

16M = 326.66 bhp/tonne
Kerb weight: 1526 kg (unvalidated: F430 Spider F1 minus Ferrari claimed 80kg)
Flywheel power: 498.48 bhp (Capristo dyno - avg. of multiple runs)

F430 Coupe F1 CCM, carbon seats = 334.53 bhp/tonne
Kerb weight: 1474 kg ( validated)
Flywheel power: 493.1 bhp (Capristo dyno - avg. of multiple runs)

458 Spider = 334.91 bhp/tonne
Kerb weight: 1648.34 kg (unvalidated: 458 Italia plus Ferrari claimed 50.34 kg)
Flywheel power: 552.04 bhp (Capristo dyno - avg. of multiple runs)

458 Italia = 345.46 bhp/tonne
Kerb weight: 1598 kg ( validated)
Flywheel power: 552.04 bhp (Capristo dyno - avg. of multiple runs)

Scuderia = 350.8 bhp/tonne
Kerb weight: 1421 kg ( validated)
Flywheel power: 498.48 bhp (Capristo dyno - avg. of multiple runs)

* My car (now) = 359.8 bhp/tonne *
Kerb weight: 1505.07 kg (F430 Spider F1 minus 100.93kg)
Flywheel power: 541.52 bhp (Capristo dyno + 10bhp for my airboxes and porting)

* My car (target weight) = 371.92 bhp/tonne *
Kerb weight: 1456 kg (F430 Spider F1 minus 150kg)
Flywheel power: 541.52 bhp (Capristo dyno + 10bhp for my airboxes and porting)

* My car (target weight and Scuderia cams) = 378.79 bhp/tonne *
Kerb weight: 1456 kg (F430 brochure minus 150kg)
Flywheel power: 551.52 bhp (Capristo dyno + 20bhp for my airboxes, porting, and cams)

458 Speciale = 400.07 bhp/tonne
Kerb weight: 1490.958 kg ( validated)
Flywheel power: 596.483 bhp (unvalidated: brochure)

* My car (target weight and engine build) = 412.09 bhp/tonne *
Kerb weight: 1456 kg (F430 Spider F1 minus 150kg)
Flywheel power: 600 bhp (target 600bhp @ 9000rpm)

sealtt

3,091 posts

158 months

Tuesday 8th November 2016
quotequote all
Those numbers are all very surprising.

Cannot believe the 458 spider has a sub 10% bhp/tonne advantage over the 430 Spider! It drives immensely faster, like different world fast. Can't imagine what a beast yours is going to be like, wow!

mwstewart

Original Poster:

7,610 posts

188 months

Tuesday 8th November 2016
quotequote all
sealtt said:
Those numbers are all very surprising.

Cannot believe the 458 spider has a sub 10% bhp/tonne advantage over the 430 Spider! It drives immensely faster, like different world fast. Can't imagine what a beast yours is going to be like, wow!
Yeah, they are surprising, but also highlight the limitation of using bhp/tonne to compare different models: the torque increase and additional gear on the 458 create an advantage the significance of which is not wholly conveyed by bhp/tonne. It's normally good for a rough idea i.e. "it's close" but that's about it, however it's a useful figure for me on the project to compare the starting point and figure out the weight of the other variants.

1/4 mile times would be better if we wanted a more accurate comparison of performance across models.

TartanPaint

2,989 posts

139 months

Wednesday 9th November 2016
quotequote all
mwstewart said:
...

the torque increase and additional gear on the 458 create an advantage the significance of which is not wholly conveyed by bhp/tonne.

...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETEpDcxJ0YM


Edited by TartanPaint on Wednesday 9th November 14:17

mwstewart

Original Poster:

7,610 posts

188 months

Wednesday 9th November 2016
quotequote all
TartanPaint said:
mwstewart said:
...

the torque increase and additional gear on the 458 create an advantage the significance of which is not wholly conveyed by bhp/tonne.

...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETEpDcxJ0YM


Edited by TartanPaint on Wednesday 9th November 14:17
The Scud and 458 are very close! (I was referring to 458 and standard F430 above) The lighter Scud is more responsive up to around 100 before the 458's torque gives it the advantage.

Both are very quick cars; I wanted a bit more performance so if I'm in their kind of ball park I will be very happy.

cheddar

4,637 posts

174 months

Wednesday 9th November 2016
quotequote all
Extraordinary last couple of pages

Did you weigh the sharpie pen before and after use on the dashboard stitching?

neilbauer

2,467 posts

183 months

Wednesday 9th November 2016
quotequote all
I've lost my way with this thread a bit.
My issues are you had a real Ferrari F430 and you've now got a 16M replica.
You have spent thousands upon thousands on all of your cars and hundreds upon hundreds of man hours.
You could have afforded a real 16M or the real M3 you were building before this.
You have so much talent and skill you could probably build your own car!
So I guess what I'm saying why don't you just buy the car you want?

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 9th November 2016
quotequote all
neilbauer said:
I've lost my way with this thread a bit.
My issues are you had a real Ferrari F430 and you've now got a 16M replica.
You have spent thousands upon thousands on all of your cars and hundreds upon hundreds of man hours.
You could have afforded a real 16M or the real M3 you were building before this.
You have so much talent and skill you could probably build your own car!
So I guess what I'm saying why don't you just buy the car you want?
Cheapest 16M is £270,000 .... I assume, based on previous posts, it will come in significantly under that and specified to his exact requirements.

neilbauer

2,467 posts

183 months

Wednesday 9th November 2016
quotequote all
Trexthedinosaur said:
neilbauer said:
I've lost my way with this thread a bit.
My issues are you had a real Ferrari F430 and you've now got a 16M replica.
You have spent thousands upon thousands on all of your cars and hundreds upon hundreds of man hours.
You could have afforded a real 16M or the real M3 you were building before this.
You have so much talent and skill you could probably build your own car!
So I guess what I'm saying why don't you just buy the car you want?
Cheapest 16M is £270,000 .... I assume, based on previous posts, it will come in significantly under that and specified to his exact requirements.
I guess.

Luke.

10,996 posts

250 months

Wednesday 9th November 2016
quotequote all
You've got a screw loose. smile

mwstewart

Original Poster:

7,610 posts

188 months

Wednesday 9th November 2016
quotequote all
laugh I knew some of the recent updates had defined a new level of anality, but I'm so caught up in this now I couldn't tackle it any other way.

It would of course be a lot easier to buy a ready-made car but the satisfaction and enjoyment from this project are priceless to me. It's been the most enjoyable car related project I've done and something I’ll never forget. I also know from experience it will make the driving experience that bit sweeter.

Bungleaio

6,332 posts

202 months

Wednesday 9th November 2016
quotequote all
Hats off to you for the wiring. I can't even figure out why my main beam isn't working on my classic mini!

Matt Cup

3,161 posts

104 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
neilbauer said:
I've lost my way with this thread a bit.
My issues are you had a real Ferrari F430 and you've now got a 16M replica.
You have spent thousands upon thousands on all of your cars and hundreds upon hundreds of man hours.
You could have afforded a real 16M or the real M3 you were building before this.
You have so much talent and skill you could probably build your own car!
So I guess what I'm saying why don't you just buy the car you want?
I don't think a 16m or any other Ferrari will be screwed together better than this one, where corners appear to have been cut on Ferrari's design/production line, this fella seems to be correcting that creating the perfect platform. The attention to detail is mind blowing.

C7 JFW

1,205 posts

219 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
neilbauer said:
I've lost my way with this thread a bit.
My issues are you had a real Ferrari F430 and you've now got a 16M replica.
You have spent thousands upon thousands on all of your cars and hundreds upon hundreds of man hours.
You could have afforded a real 16M or the real M3 you were building before this.
You have so much talent and skill you could probably build your own car!
So I guess what I'm saying why don't you just buy the car you want?
This just shows how much attention you've paid to the original M3 thread.

The M3 CSL (many parts were taken from or inspired from) isn't perfect and has several undesirable spec changes. Conversely, the thread shows the benefits of engineering a car to your own spec and the adjustments put in to truly refine the formula.

The Ferrari is much the same, bringing the very best of the higher model to the existing platform, then refining and adding to it to minimise downfalls and maximise benefits.

It makes perfect sense to me and i'll be modifying whenI buy my own Ferrari too.

p1stonhead

25,549 posts

167 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
C7 JFW said:
neilbauer said:
I've lost my way with this thread a bit.
My issues are you had a real Ferrari F430 and you've now got a 16M replica.
You have spent thousands upon thousands on all of your cars and hundreds upon hundreds of man hours.
You could have afforded a real 16M or the real M3 you were building before this.
You have so much talent and skill you could probably build your own car!
So I guess what I'm saying why don't you just buy the car you want?
This just shows how much attention you've paid to the original M3 thread.

The M3 CSL (many parts were taken from or inspired from) isn't perfect and has several undesirable spec changes. Conversely, the thread shows the benefits of engineering a car to your own spec and the adjustments put in to truly refine the formula.

The Ferrari is much the same, bringing the very best of the higher model to the existing platform, then refining and adding to it to minimise downfalls and maximise benefits.

It makes perfect sense to me and i'll be modifying whenI buy my own Ferrari too.
Im 100% behind this, and its a phenomenal piece of work.

But I would personally lose the 16M badges as to me it undermines what OP has done making the car to HIS specification. Its a brilliant car, but its not a 16M and doesnt need to pretend to be IMO. It detracts from the work and makes it seem like someone has just tried to make a replica.

neilbauer

2,467 posts

183 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
p1stonhead said:
C7 JFW said:
neilbauer said:
I've lost my way with this thread a bit.
My issues are you had a real Ferrari F430 and you've now got a 16M replica.
You have spent thousands upon thousands on all of your cars and hundreds upon hundreds of man hours.
You could have afforded a real 16M or the real M3 you were building before this.
You have so much talent and skill you could probably build your own car!
So I guess what I'm saying why don't you just buy the car you want?
This just shows how much attention you've paid to the original M3 thread.

The M3 CSL (many parts were taken from or inspired from) isn't perfect and has several undesirable spec changes. Conversely, the thread shows the benefits of engineering a car to your own spec and the adjustments put in to truly refine the formula.

The Ferrari is much the same, bringing the very best of the higher model to the existing platform, then refining and adding to it to minimise downfalls and maximise benefits.

It makes perfect sense to me and i'll be modifying whenI buy my own Ferrari too.
Im 100% behind this, and its a phenomenal piece of work.

But I would personally lose the 16M badges as to me it undermines what OP has done making the car to HIS specification. Its a brilliant car, but its not a 16M and doesnt need to pretend to be IMO. It detracts from the work and makes it seem like someone has just tried to make a replica.
What P1STONHEAD said.

likesachange

2,631 posts

194 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
Yes ditch the 16m Badge and apply a 438 badge in 458 type font... that will confuse people!

Amazing what you have done to this.... Hats off

alec.e

2,149 posts

124 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
Normally I am against 'up badging' cars, but I feel this one is justified, due to all the correct detail being added plus more.

mwstewart

Original Poster:

7,610 posts

188 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
Thanks all. Custom badging is something I will explore if I go for the engine build, as then technically it wouldn't be a 430 - it'd be a 470.