Porsche Boxster 986 - engine swap project

Porsche Boxster 986 - engine swap project

Author
Discussion

HughG

3,547 posts

241 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
chuntington101 said:
Escy said:
I don't think the hoses will need protecting but it's something I'll keep an eye on.

Yes, the engine radiators will be less efficient but it's no different to having a big intercooler in front of a water radiator and that's common practice.
No less effective than when you are running AC in sure! Lol

Only question is have is how are the radiator configured? Are you running them in serries or parallel? The size of the pipework looks pretty small so would think that parallel would be the best option.
That's an interesting question. If parallel does halving the flow rate increase the time exposed to cool? Or does that temperature mean less temperature difference and therefore less effective? Or both? Can someone cleverer than me answer that?

Fastdruid

8,639 posts

152 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
Well it's been a *long* time since I looked at heat exchangers in university but the higher the temperature differential between the two the better the efficiency so I'd expect that parallel would be best.... however that's theoretical, differences in flow rates could scupper things.

Escy

Original Poster:

3,930 posts

149 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
purpleliability said:
Using water wetter is useful in charge coolers (I had one on my GT4) to help with cavitation. It's also worth protecting the charge cooler from any radiant heat underneath.

I've never added any additional cooling the the charge cooler itself but you could try some heatsinks on the top of the polished surface (plenty of space there) to increase the thermal efficiency of the box itself? Maybe some ducting to air cool the box too? Great project by the way, excellent work.
Thanks for the advice. I'll see how hot the charge cooler gets before I change anything. I think it's going to stay quite cool in the boot, there is the factory heat shield protecting the boot floor, it is mounted 15mm clear of the boot carpet so there is air circulation around it and it's directly above the gearbox rather than the exhaust. The tank does sit above the exhaust but that's likely to be warm anyway as it's just come from the charge cooler.

chuntington101 said:
Only question is have is how are the radiator configured? Are you running them in serries or parallel? The size of the pipework looks pretty small so would think that parallel would be the best option.
The pipe work is 19mm. I'm running them parallel on the advice of Max Torque. I'm going to be data logging the charge cooler temperature so if I don't get the desired results i'll try them in series.

purpleliability

627 posts

185 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
These guys fitted heat sink fins to the core of their best intercooler : http://www.litchfieldimports.co.uk/Nissan-GTR/Race...

Air to air rather than water to air I admit but it might add a bit of stamina to your charge cooler core.

chuntington101

5,733 posts

236 months

Tuesday 27th September 2016
quotequote all
HughG said:
chuntington101 said:
Escy said:
I don't think the hoses will need protecting but it's something I'll keep an eye on.

Yes, the engine radiators will be less efficient but it's no different to having a big intercooler in front of a water radiator and that's common practice.
No less effective than when you are running AC in sure! Lol

Only question is have is how are the radiator configured? Are you running them in serries or parallel? The size of the pipework looks pretty small so would think that parallel would be the best option.
That's an interesting question. If parallel does halving the flow rate increase the time exposed to cool? Or does that temperature mean less temperature difference and therefore less effective? Or both? Can someone cleverer than me answer that?
In terms of cooling I think there is little difference. The key thing I not limiting flow of water. The AC pipe worked looked a little small that was all.

Escy

Original Poster:

3,930 posts

149 months

Tuesday 27th September 2016
quotequote all
The ac pipe work was replaced, the inlet/outlet pipes on the ac condensers are now the same diameter as the pump.

Justin S

3,641 posts

261 months

Tuesday 27th September 2016
quotequote all
Where did you get those bleed points from as been looking for one for my car.

Escy

Original Poster:

3,930 posts

149 months

Tuesday 27th September 2016
quotequote all

ooid

4,087 posts

100 months

Sunday 16th October 2016
quotequote all
Escy said:
Yes, the engine radiators will be less efficient but it's no different to having a big intercooler in front of a water radiator and that's common practice.
super interesting project, been following for sometime. beer

Mini question; What if you actually remove AC condensers and use original side radiators for your turbo cooling, and use the original main-front radiator of boxster S for the engine cooling? Making sure that also using waterless coolant (EVANs) -Not sure if its possible in your project? - so that even in extreme conditions you can avoid over-heating and etc..


chuntington101

5,733 posts

236 months

Sunday 16th October 2016
quotequote all
ooid said:
Escy said:
Yes, the engine radiators will be less efficient but it's no different to having a big intercooler in front of a water radiator and that's common practice.
super interesting project, been following for sometime. beer

Mini question; What if you actually remove AC condensers and use original side radiators for your turbo cooling, and use the original main-front radiator of boxster S for the engine cooling? Making sure that also using waterless coolant (EVANs) -Not sure if its possible in your project? - so that even in extreme conditions you can avoid over-heating and etc..
I doubt that would provide enough cooling for the engine! If he Boxster S needed the third rad I can see how an additional double BHP could run on only the third radiator.

Escy

Original Poster:

3,930 posts

149 months

Monday 17th October 2016
quotequote all
The middle radiator isn't very big, apparently it's not up to the task of cooling the charge cooler system on track, let alone the engine. I did look into the Evans waterless coolant but it seemed like it might be more trouble than it's worth.

Escy

Original Poster:

3,930 posts

149 months

Monday 31st October 2016
quotequote all
Little update. It's nearly ready for a test drive but i've got a couple of issues stopping the show, it's got a leak on the charge cooler system, i'm looking into using different radiators. I'm also having problems with the oil return on the turbo, it's leaking oil past the seals into the exhaust, ordered a few bits that will hopefully put it right.

I installed a catch can so that's the engine bay finished off. This is what I started with. That's the gear selector cables that run over the inlet manifold. Seems a bit of a lazy effort from Porsche. I've got them running under the inlet manifold on the V6.





This is how much space I have in front of the engine. I'm sure anyone with a 2.7t engine in an Audi will be jealous. I fancy my chances doing a cambelt change in-situ if required. Normally when doing an engine swap I find you end up with lots of straightforward maintenance jobs that become a nightmare. I don't think there is a single job that's going to be more difficult on this car than would be on a standard Boxster or Audi S4. You can see just by looking at the flat 6 how difficult access for various jobs, the V6 is a much easier engine to work on (provided it's not in an Audi!)




I added a heat shield to protect the CV boot from the exhaust.

alec.e

2,149 posts

124 months

Monday 31st October 2016
quotequote all
Fantastic work! Cant wait to see it moving.

gregs656

10,876 posts

181 months

Tuesday 1st November 2016
quotequote all
Superb effort.

Shadow R1

3,800 posts

176 months

Tuesday 1st November 2016
quotequote all
Great stuff, any chance of video once you get it out on the road ?

gf15

985 posts

266 months

Tuesday 1st November 2016
quotequote all
Of the two differenty engine pictures, I think that the Audi engine looks more OEM and the more professional installation IMHO.
Superb work.

Escy

Original Poster:

3,930 posts

149 months

Tuesday 1st November 2016
quotequote all
Thank you. I have to say i'm pleased with how at home it looks. That side of the build went alot smoother than I expected.

ooid

4,087 posts

100 months

Tuesday 1st November 2016
quotequote all
Are you using the power steering pump pulley from Boxster? I would not say they are reliable, mine just gone this summer, not a great experience! biggrin



Escy

Original Poster:

3,930 posts

149 months

Tuesday 1st November 2016
quotequote all
I'm using the Audi power steering pump with the Boxster pulley. The pump is basically the same but Porsche have the reservoir built into the back of the pump.

piers1

826 posts

194 months

Tuesday 1st November 2016
quotequote all
Looking fantastic, what a cracking job, cannot wait to see the finished machine and vids of it on the move