Russian airforce at it again...

Russian airforce at it again...

Author
Discussion

SVX

Original Poster:

2,182 posts

211 months

Saturday 30th April 2016
quotequote all
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-36175973

I bet the cockpit voice recording of the US aircraft would make for interesting listening. I wonder what type of "reconnaissance" aircraft it was?

markmullen

15,877 posts

234 months

Saturday 30th April 2016
quotequote all

ecsrobin

17,118 posts

165 months

Saturday 30th April 2016
quotequote all
SVX said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-36175973

I bet the cockpit voice recording of the US aircraft would make for interesting listening. I wonder what type of "reconnaissance" aircraft it was?
I believe it was a P8 Poseidon.

Fabric

3,819 posts

192 months

Saturday 30th April 2016
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
I believe it was a P8 Poseidon.
It was an RC-135.

ETA: There was however a similar incident with a P-8 over the Kamchatka Peninsula reported very recently too.

TEKNOPUG

18,950 posts

205 months

Saturday 30th April 2016
quotequote all
If they are that much of a danger, shot them down.

Or quit whining.

16v_paddy

360 posts

192 months

Saturday 30th April 2016
quotequote all
TEKNOPUG said:
If they are that much of a danger, shot them down.

Or quit whining.
I think it'd struggle to shoot anything down tbh shoot


All that jazz

7,632 posts

146 months

Saturday 30th April 2016
quotequote all
blurb said:
Mr Hernandez said the Su-27's "erratic and aggressive manoeuvres" also threatened the safety of the US aircrew, coming within 7.6m (25ft) of the fuselage of the American plane before conducting its barrel roll.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Friday defended the flybys of warplanes over the US Navy destroyer in the Baltic Sea, insisting they were looking at the ship only "from a safe distance".
rofl

MartG

20,677 posts

204 months

Monday 2nd May 2016
quotequote all
Maybe some form of non-lethal retaliation is needed.....like chaff canisters filled with paint fired so the Russian aircraft flies through the paint cloud and returns to base covered in pretty colours wink


TEKNOPUG

18,950 posts

205 months

Monday 2nd May 2016
quotequote all
16v_paddy said:
TEKNOPUG said:
If they are that much of a danger, shot them down.

Or quit whining.
I think it'd struggle to shoot anything down tbh shoot

This wouldn't though..


Steve_D

13,747 posts

258 months

Monday 2nd May 2016
quotequote all
MartG said:
Maybe some form of non-lethal retaliation is needed.....like chaff canisters filled with paint fired so the Russian aircraft flies through the paint cloud and returns to base covered in pretty colours wink

I had similar thoughts along the lines of 'How far could I throw a bucket of galley waste'

Steve

Quattromaster

2,907 posts

204 months

Monday 2nd May 2016
quotequote all
16v_paddy said:
Trick of the lens or am I going mad but has this aircraft got different engines on each wing.

Condi

17,190 posts

171 months

Monday 2nd May 2016
quotequote all
It does amaze me that the US accuse the Russians of aggression when the US are camped off their coastline. Had it been in the Mid-Atlantic or near the US coast I can understand, but you cant expect to put military assets near someone else's water and not expect some company.

MartG

20,677 posts

204 months

Monday 2nd May 2016
quotequote all
Condi said:
It does amaze me that the US accuse the Russians of aggression when the US are camped off their coastline. Had it been in the Mid-Atlantic or near the US coast I can understand, but you cant expect to put military assets near someone else's water and not expect some company.
Can you imagine how folk like Trump would react to a Russian fleet a few miles off New York eek

DMN

2,983 posts

139 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2016
quotequote all
MartG said:
Can you imagine how folk like Trump would react to a Russian fleet a few miles off New York eek
Like most commentators he'd be impressed they managed to get that far from base without breaking down.

FourWheelDrift

88,516 posts

284 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2016
quotequote all
MartG said:
Condi said:
It does amaze me that the US accuse the Russians of aggression when the US are camped off their coastline. Had it been in the Mid-Atlantic or near the US coast I can understand, but you cant expect to put military assets near someone else's water and not expect some company.
Can you imagine how folk like Drumpf would react to a Russian fleet a few miles off New York eek
They do send things over though.

Surveillance ship - http://news.sky.com/story/1546736/russian-military...

Occasional bomber - http://www.cbsnews.com/news/norad-fighter-jets-scr...

motomk

2,150 posts

244 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
Quattromaster said:
Trick of the lens or am I going mad but has this aircraft got different engines on each wing.
Just painted a different colour on the inside. I think the ones on the other wing will be black too if you looked at it from the other wing.

FourWheelDrift

88,516 posts

284 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
motomk said:
Quattromaster said:
Trick of the lens or am I going mad but has this aircraft got different engines on each wing.
Just painted a different colour on the inside. I think the ones on the other wing will be black too if you looked at it from the other wing.
Why? Like all modern cars, black is the new white!;)
Photography related I think I read somewhere???
No it is painted black, as is the right wing.

RC-135 Cobra Ball - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_RC-135#RC-135...


DMN

2,983 posts

139 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
No it is painted black, as is the right wing.

RC-135 Cobra Ball - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_RC-135#RC-135...

Key point of that link:

"The Cobra Ball monitors missile-associated signals and tracks missiles during boost and re-entry phases to provide reconnaissance for treaty verification"

So the plane has every right to be where it was.

Vitorio

4,296 posts

143 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
DMN said:
Key point of that link:

"The Cobra Ball monitors missile-associated signals and tracks missiles during boost and re-entry phases to provide reconnaissance for treaty verification"

So the plane has every right to be where it was.
That is an extrapolation, depending on what the treaty mentions as valid means of verification, this may or may not be valid, and depending on previous deployments of those aircraft, this might have been an unusual move anyway.

Mike Random

466 posts

170 months

Monday 9th May 2016
quotequote all
MartG said:
Maybe some form of non-lethal retaliation is needed.....like chaff canisters filled with paint fired so the Russian aircraft flies through the paint cloud and returns to base covered in pretty colours wink

Great movie, "woof woof, will you quit with those negative thoughts"