Finally pictures of our Twin v6 205 - Only on Piston heads

Finally pictures of our Twin v6 205 - Only on Piston heads

Author
Discussion

Jsyphil

23 posts

173 months

Monday 29th March 2010
quotequote all
Awesome. That is all. Top car pal, looks bonkers coolclap

The Black Flash

13,735 posts

198 months

Monday 29th March 2010
quotequote all
Utterly, utterly brilliant. bowclap

Any more info? I'd love to see how you've connected the drive from the two engines together.

dudleybloke

19,824 posts

186 months

Monday 29th March 2010
quotequote all
brilliant!


WEREWOLF

581 posts

230 months

Monday 29th March 2010
quotequote all
Martin ....what a crap car....lol.....you ordered my gauges and bushes yet?.....

dont think i can make it over to johnnies on sat btw...oh and you can put your graphics on pug if you want..

paul..

Edited by WEREWOLF on Tuesday 30th March 00:00

Orb the Impaler

1,881 posts

190 months

Tuesday 30th March 2010
quotequote all
What the fk!!!! yikes

Top effort! biggrin

PRD Motorsport

Original Poster:

28 posts

169 months

Tuesday 30th March 2010
quotequote all
EDLT said:
How much 205 is actually left under the bodywork?
That’s a good question! Not much at all, front chassis legs, floor pan, some of the rear chassis legs, A and B pillars and the roof, the only thing I can think of that hasn’t be modified is the windscreen of course only if you don’t regard the sun strip as a mod.

The Black Flash said:
Utterly, utterly brilliant. bowclap

Any more info? I'd love to see how you've connected the drive from the two engines together.
The engines are only connected together via shifter cables, clutch and throttle cables, all are fully adjustable including rate, balance and ramp angle. Two engines running in one car, simply creates double the torque and bhp at ANY given rpm scale. They simply work along side each other, regardless of their power differences. A simpler way to understand is imagining one person pushing a car then someone else helping out with out going into to much detail with extra weight, and how state of tune can develop different handling and balance characteristics

The rear engine is cooled via two small Civic radiators installed in each rear arch, I have used 406 drive shafts, hubs, 305mm disks, Brembo callipers all round and a 406 servo to avoid any clearance problems with the engine in the front. The exhaust has two separate systems which each have there own unique design to allow top end performance for front and low down torque on the rear, which all ends up going through one tail pipe. Rims will be fitted with 240/610/17 yoko full slicks

No traction control, no abs, no PS, no bullst


WEREWOLF said:
Martin ....what a crap car....lol.....you ordered my gauges and bushes yet?.....

dont think i can make it over to johnnies on sat btw...oh and you can put your graphics on pug if you want..

paul..

Edited by WEREWOLF on Tuesday 30th March 00:00
Paul,

Still waiting on company about the dials, although I have looking else where in the meantime. Almost bought some bushes yesterday until I started pondering about replacing with bronze rod I can machine on Johnny’s lathe. Though not to worry I guarantee they will be here way before you will need them, when its looking like my car will be finished before yours!!

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

190 months

Tuesday 30th March 2010
quotequote all
Hi there. Interestignprojct. Curoius but how does the driveline work? Presumably you have some form of centre diff or elese the engines would be fighting each other every time you went round a corner. But how do you control drive, especially when one pair of wheels lose traction or slide?

Cheers.

zakelwe

4,449 posts

198 months

Tuesday 30th March 2010
quotequote all
As Chris Goffey would say on old Top Gear "Well that's what it looks like under the bonnet, how does it go? "

Any performance figures yet?

Andy

LeoZwalf

2,802 posts

230 months

Tuesday 30th March 2010
quotequote all
Totally cracking, I love stuff like this smile What sort of 205 did it start out as? Naturally I too am curious to know how it drives and what the performance is, not to mention the sound yikes

I'm not sure why people think the engines will be fighting each other or think there must be some kind of transmission link between the two. I think the OP's explanation of one person pushing from the back and then someone else joining in by pulling at the front is a good one - the engines simply 'help' each other out plus of course you get 4wd.

Great project, very well done for sticking at it for so long, OP.

jbi

12,671 posts

204 months

Tuesday 30th March 2010
quotequote all
it's things like this that let me keep faith in my fellow man...

well done sir smile

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

190 months

Tuesday 30th March 2010
quotequote all
LeoZwalf said:
I'm not sure why people think the engines will be fighting each other or think there must be some kind of transmission link between the two. I think the OP's explanation of one person pushing from the back and then someone else joining in by pulling at the front is a good one - the engines simply 'help' each other out plus of course you get 4wd.
I don't know how it's setup. If what you say is true, then that would mean dual gearboxes, so no actual drivetrain link between the engines. But I don't know if this is how they've done it or not.

S3_Graham

12,830 posts

199 months

Tuesday 30th March 2010
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
LeoZwalf said:
I'm not sure why people think the engines will be fighting each other or think there must be some kind of transmission link between the two. I think the OP's explanation of one person pushing from the back and then someone else joining in by pulling at the front is a good one - the engines simply 'help' each other out plus of course you get 4wd.
I don't know how it's setup. If what you say is true, then that would mean dual gearboxes, so no actual drivetrain link between the engines. But I don't know if this is how they've done it or not.
thats what it sounds like to me... both running totally seperate.

snotrag

14,459 posts

211 months

Tuesday 30th March 2010
quotequote all
Yup, sounds like totally seperate to me. Seen it done in a similwar way on a few cars before. One engine drives the front, one drives the rear, easy peasy... (!)

BoRED S2upid

19,700 posts

240 months

Tuesday 30th March 2010
quotequote all
snotrag said:
Yup, sounds like totally seperate to me. Seen it done in a similwar way on a few cars before. One engine drives the front, one drives the rear, easy peasy... (!)
Its how all cars should be.

Dr G

15,175 posts

242 months

Tuesday 30th March 2010
quotequote all
BoRED S2upid said:
snotrag said:
Yup, sounds like totally seperate to me. Seen it done in a similwar way on a few cars before. One engine drives the front, one drives the rear, easy peasy... (!)
Its how all cars should be.
But with two turbo V8s biggrin

Very cool project!

r11co

6,244 posts

230 months

Tuesday 30th March 2010
quotequote all
I don't know why people are thinking two engines in one vehicle can't work. Think of aircraft!!!

Plus it's been done before many times with cars. I've seen a twin-engined (original) Mini, plus a MkII Golf with VR6 engines front and back.

james_tigerwoods

16,287 posts

197 months

Tuesday 30th March 2010
quotequote all
Bonkers - I like it thumbup

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

190 months

Tuesday 30th March 2010
quotequote all
r11co said:
I don't know why people are thinking two engines in one vehicle can't work. Think of aircraft!!!

Plus it's been done before many times with cars. I've seen a twin-engined (original) Mini, plus a MkII Golf with VR6 engines front and back.
Im not saying it can't work. I'm asking how?????

And an aircraft bears no simarity.

Nikko 40691

710 posts

190 months

Tuesday 30th March 2010
quotequote all
Any videos of this?

Matt_N

8,902 posts

202 months

Tuesday 30th March 2010
quotequote all
Bonkers!

Reminds me of this too, a twin VR6 engined Lupo:

http://forums.clublupo.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=2...