981 Boxster Silverstone Pre Launch Event

981 Boxster Silverstone Pre Launch Event

Author
Discussion

Chins

Original Poster:

138 posts

170 months

Wednesday 11th April 2012
quotequote all
mayes911 said:
SFO said(less power than a spyder and slower than a spyder on paper)
0-62 for Spyder: 5.1 sec
0-62 for 981S: 5.1 sec

Top speed Spyder: 166mph
Top speed 981S: 173mph


yes the o-62 times are the same but 0-99mph the manual spyder is 0.2 second quicker and the pdk spyder in sport plus is nearly half a second quicker.but more importantly is the flexibility,50-75mph in 5th gear
spyder is 6.1secs manual
981s is 6.7secs manual

so on paper the spyder is quicker manual or pdk

Edited by mayes911 on Tuesday 10th April 23:01
The PDK's flexibility from 50-75 is 3.0 vs 3.1 in favour of the Spyder. So not a lot in it. Your next post shows that it's the weight saving of 40kg that helps make some of the difference. In reality though most Spyders have aircon and radio spec'd back in. That nearly halves the weight saving. Ditch the buckets and the Spyder is nearly the same weight. In fact when you can spec the buckets in the 981 it will save 12kg.

90% of Spyders I have seen for sale, my own one included had air and radio at least.

With the rumoured turbo charged Boxster on the way in the next 18-24 months they need to leave a gap power wise. That said I would still of liked a few more ponies

AndyWoodall

2,625 posts

259 months

Wednesday 11th April 2012
quotequote all
Going to the local OPC towards the end of this month to see the launch cars, I can't wait, it looks fantastic.

I'm a big Boxster fan, but my budget doesn't stretch to a new one, so get buying folks, I'd like a 2.7 manual with very few options in a nice colour please. smile

Interesting the split in PDK/Manual, although not surprising. It would have to be manual for me, though I do get the PDK as a sensible choice.


Not Ideal

2,899 posts

188 months

Wednesday 11th April 2012
quotequote all
Good write up thanks for that.

Shame you didn't get to try a non-PASM car as that comparison would be most useful.

Absolutely love it!

mrh1275

922 posts

202 months

Wednesday 11th April 2012
quotequote all
SFO said:
mayes911 said:
(less power than a spyder and slower than a spyder on paper)
0-62 for Spyder: 5.1 sec
0-62 for 981S: 5.1 sec

Top speed Spyder: 166mph
Top speed 981S: 173mph
Spyder 4.6 sec = manual car.
I have also timed mine and it is quicker than 5.1 thumbup

mayes911

5,203 posts

185 months

Wednesday 11th April 2012
quotequote all
Spyder 4.6 sec = manual car


was that with a v-box to 60mph
also did you get 0-100mph time?

khushy

3,964 posts

219 months

Wednesday 11th April 2012
quotequote all
on another forum the timed a Spyder at 4.3s to 62!!!!

FFS

mayes911

5,203 posts

185 months

Wednesday 11th April 2012
quotequote all
PDK sport plus ffs

dazren

22,612 posts

261 months

Thursday 12th April 2012
quotequote all
To FFS or not to FFS? That is the question.

Frankly we'd rather you didn't. Thanks. Raise the bar please gents.

DAZ smile

Old Trout

1,667 posts

175 months

Thursday 12th April 2012
quotequote all
Chins? Did you used to be on Scoobynet - or is it a coincidental moniker?

Chins

Original Poster:

138 posts

170 months

Thursday 12th April 2012
quotequote all
Old Trout said:
Chins? Did you used to be on Scoobynet - or is it a coincidental moniker?
Yes I am the stupid git that had about 9 Scoobies in 4-5 years smile

Zyp

14,698 posts

189 months

Thursday 12th April 2012
quotequote all
Chins said:
Old Trout said:
Chins? Did you used to be on Scoobynet - or is it a coincidental moniker?
Yes I am the stupid git that had about 9 Scoobies in 4-5 years smile
Did you also have a Focus RS mk1?

Chins

Original Poster:

138 posts

170 months

Thursday 12th April 2012
quotequote all
Zyp said:
Chins said:
Old Trout said:
Chins? Did you used to be on Scoobynet - or is it a coincidental moniker?
Yes I am the stupid git that had about 9 Scoobies in 4-5 years smile
Did you also have a Focus RS mk1?
Never managed one of them

mrdemon

21,146 posts

265 months

Thursday 12th April 2012
quotequote all
But he had a nice TTRS

Chins

Original Poster:

138 posts

170 months

Thursday 12th April 2012
quotequote all
mrdemon said:
But he had a nice TTRS
Your right - 4 Mk2 TT's. Don't really miss the TTRS though. After the PSE on the Spyder the noise from the TTRS always sounded false/wrong for some reason. Damn fast car though both in regards to speed and depreciation frown can't wait for the 981

Old Trout

1,667 posts

175 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
Chins said:
Yes I am the stupid git that had about 9 Scoobies in 4-5 years smile
Hey Jonathan,

It's David/Rannoch - remember I took you for a passenger ride in my StI V at Bedford and we got black flagged for noise because they thought I was Craig Hardman (who is also on here with a 911)

Good to see you in sensible metal!

SonnyM

3,472 posts

193 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
mayes911 said:
oh i forgot power
spyder 320 hp/370nm torque
981s 315hp/360nm torque
weight
spyder 1275kg
981s 1320kg

usually new porsches have more power than the out going model?( ie 987gen1 295hp rs60 303hp gen2 310hp???????)
so why didnt the 981s have at least 325hp?

Edited by mayes911 on Tuesday 10th April 23:02
With 325hp could it close the gap with base 991?

Stats aside isn't the 981 much faster than 987 around the Nurburgsing?

Chins

Original Poster:

138 posts

170 months

Saturday 14th April 2012
quotequote all
Old Trout said:
Chins said:
Yes I am the stupid git that had about 9 Scoobies in 4-5 years smile
Hey Jonathan,

It's David/Rannoch - remember I took you for a passenger ride in my StI V at Bedford and we got black flagged for noise because they thought I was Craig Hardman (who is also on here with a 911)

Good to see you in sensible metal!
Some good times. Age and money helps in the selection of car nowadays smile Still see STI V's though and smile.