Anyone got a Singer?

Anyone got a Singer?

Author
Discussion

Koln-RS

3,856 posts

212 months

Thursday 31st July 2014
quotequote all
Some of the detailing on the Singers looks very nice, although other bits I'm not so sure about.

But, they are just a 'back dated' 964 - and I presume, if you buy one based on a rhd donor car, the V5 will still say "1990 Porsche 964" not "2015 Singer"?

It's a rich man's toy. The original RSs are now the 'holy grail'.

mollytherocker

14,366 posts

209 months

Thursday 31st July 2014
quotequote all
dugsud said:
So using that criteria this is not a Porsche either....

Not a Porsche, no. Its a RUF and registered as such.

However, its not comparable to a Singer is it? The Singer is a retro/modern take on a classic car. The Yellowbird was a highly modified re-imagining of a current model. It was explosive at the time, but sufferred from reliability issues.

The Yellowbird has of course become a bit of a legend, I guess mainly due to that video filmed round the ring with Stefan Roser getting the car at impossible angles in clouds of smoke!

OlberJ

14,101 posts

233 months

Thursday 31st July 2014
quotequote all
It's an excellent video showing the difference between power sliding and drifting though!

uktrailmonster

4,827 posts

200 months

Thursday 31st July 2014
quotequote all
OlberJ said:
Quite. The rear wheels on the singers are awful IMO.

Without the silly wide arches and rear wheels, it'd be a whole different ball game for me.
I'm sure they could build one to your exact taste if you were serious. Is that not the whole point of a totally custom build?
FWIW I don't like the silly big wheel look either.



Muzzer79

9,892 posts

187 months

Thursday 31st July 2014
quotequote all
uktrailmonster said:
OlberJ said:
Quite. The rear wheels on the singers are awful IMO.

Without the silly wide arches and rear wheels, it'd be a whole different ball game for me.
I'm sure they could build one to your exact taste if you were serious. Is that not the whole point of a totally custom build?
FWIW I don't like the silly big wheel look either.
I was just going to post this

Surely Singer build it to your exact spec?

If you don't want wide arch and wide wheels; spec it thus...

I think they're great. If I had the means....

OlberJ

14,101 posts

233 months

Thursday 31st July 2014
quotequote all
Indeed I imagine they would.

Some of the lovely bespoke interior trims and touches I love. and the built engines too.

What would they charge for it though is the real question!

bigunit00

890 posts

147 months

Thursday 31st July 2014
quotequote all
OlberJ said:
Indeed I imagine they would.

Some of the lovely bespoke interior trims and touches I love. and the built engines too.

What would they charge for it though is the real question!
i thought they were about $300k give or take.

shoestring7

6,138 posts

246 months

Thursday 31st July 2014
quotequote all
Personally I think their attention to detail is up there with Pagani's, bits you don't notice at first like the engine lid hinge, front light cluster, oil filler, rear luggage straps, plenum etc. are like jewellery. Certainly it makes a Maclaren look plasticky and very mass produced.

My take on the Singer is that to call it a back-date rather misses the point, its way more than a cocktail of bits from various era's of 911 chucked in a blender with a side order of good intentions . What they've tried to do is imagine what a 911 would be like if the impact bumper cars didn't happen, and then add a big helping of surprise and delight that demonstrates both an obsessive determination to get it right, and a deep love of Porsche's heritage. And best of all, that obsession extends to the way it goes, stops, handles and drives. I've not driven one, but both Harris and Meaden were deeply impressed - good enough for me.

SS7