Prospective 981 GT4 Owners Discussion Forum.

Prospective 981 GT4 Owners Discussion Forum.

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

APOLO1

5,256 posts

194 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
DMC2 said:
APOLO1 said:
not my cup of tea......spoiled by the GT3.........
Although amazing on track the 991 GT3 is pretty numb and un-involving as a road car unless you do silly speeds. I am not saying it isn't an incredible car, but in my eyes it is too capable for road driving. Maybe a manual Cayman GT4 will turn out to be a better bet for road going involvement and fun.
I am sorry I completely disagree, the GT3 is great fun at all speeds on the road, plenty of nose back ground clatter going on at low speeds, also the low speed turn in and the rws make the car like a little dino.......and that engine.......

mrdemon

Original Poster:

21,146 posts

265 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
No one will ever agree on what car to drive for fun

Some take it all the way and buy a Caterham
Some a bit less have a Lotus
GT3
R

Some say for fun you have to have open top all the way
etc etc

Every one finds a level they are happy with to have a week end fun car, no right or wrong.
Same with PDK vs Manual

I would not be having fun in a 991 GT3 how ever great it is, even my dream 458S I doubt I would be having fun in after a while.
My GT3 was so frustrating I had to sell it.
And a lot of people don't have the cash to goto Spa every month.

I like a week end blat with mates and the R/Spyder both do that area perfect, I don't really need a GT4, just don't fancy missing out on one lol
And I always like to own the best car in that range/model.

I am a bit scared to even part with my R as it is perfect for me, but too tempted with a few more BHp and this GT4

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

196 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
APOLO1 said:
lemmingjames said:
APOLO1 said:
not my cup of tea......spoiled by the GT3.........
sure sure, weve heard that before
why would I want something with over 100bhp less?, though having said that a close ratio stick shift, 370bhp,? proper Lsd, CCBDs, bucket's......Big point for me is though the rws or lack off......
Would a Cayman need rear wheel steer though? My understanding was it is used on the 911 to overcome its inherrant tendency to understeer at corner entry due to the rear engined weight balance? Something a Cayman isn't inclined to do.

Does the 918 have it?

DMC2

1,833 posts

211 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
APOLO1 said:
DMC2 said:
APOLO1 said:
not my cup of tea......spoiled by the GT3.........
Although amazing on track the 991 GT3 is pretty numb and un-involving as a road car unless you do silly speeds. I am not saying it isn't an incredible car, but in my eyes it is too capable for road driving. Maybe a manual Cayman GT4 will turn out to be a better bet for road going involvement and fun.
I am sorry I completely disagree, the GT3 is great fun at all speeds on the road, plenty of nose back ground clatter going on at low speeds, also the low speed turn in and the rws make the car like a little dino.......and that engine.......
Okay, lets agree to disagree. I feel a car only comes alive when it starts moving and twitching, and the GT3 is so good now that it is VERY illegal to do that on the road!!! I also feel the new engine has a lot less character at average speeds than the Metzger, unless you are near the top end which again means you are doing silly speeds!!!

dom9

8,068 posts

209 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I felt like that for many years and always preferred the peaky/ revvy nature of small capacity engines but (I don't know whether it is age or spending more time driving in town) I do like a slug of torque these days. Yeah, it's not going to be a night and day difference with 200cc or 400cc extra capacity but it may be noticeable.

I know it's too early to say but I suspect this would be a keeper for me and (for once) I'll try and keep it 100% standard. I guess a 3.6 would be a good compromise with a little over 100bhp/litre and since Porsche don't use a 3.6 anywhere else at the moment, it would also be bespoke to the car, which would be a nice touch (until the Spyder comes and presumably shares the same engine).

mrdemon

Original Poster:

21,146 posts

265 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
dom9 said:
I felt like that for many years and always preferred the peaky/ revvy nature of small capacity engines but (I don't know whether it is age or spending more time driving in town) I do like a slug of torque these days. Yeah, it's not going to be a night and day difference with 200cc or 400cc extra capacity but it may be noticeable.

I know it's too early to say but I suspect this would be a keeper for me and (for once) I'll try and keep it 100% standard. I guess a 3.6 would be a good compromise with a little over 100bhp/litre and since Porsche don't use a 3.6 anywhere else at the moment, it would also be bespoke to the car, which would be a nice touch (until the Spyder comes and presumably shares the same engine).
I agree, the Cayman just needs a bit more torque imo, always nice to move the rear end under power and not lift off.

ATM if the R understeers, you have to lift off to tuck in, where with a dab more torque you can move the rear end instead with power :-)

always a nice feeling to have shove out the bends. revs fail in this dept and it revs to over 7k anyway.

dom9

8,068 posts

209 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
And that's a perfectly valid argument... I just think that a 3.4 will be an electronically tuned version of the same engine fromt he GTS. A 3.6 would likely have similar power/ torque characteristics (but a little bit 'more', a little bit 'earlier') but be bespoke, which would 'lift' it for me.

mrdemon said:
I agree, the Cayman just needs a bit more torque imo, always nice to move the rear end under power and not lift off.

ATM if the R understeers, you have to lift off to tuck in, where with a dab more torque you can move the rear end instead with power :-)

always a nice feeling to have shove out the bends. revs fail in this dept and it revs to over 7k anyway.
I can't speak from experience like you, David, but that's an interesting point of view from an owner who can peddle a bit.

A surplus of power doesn't really help much, day to day. A surplus of torque would always be nice to have on tap.

Maybe I am just looking for the diesel version wink

As much as depreciation isn't a big factor for me (with the intention of it being a life keeper) I think a 3.6 on top of GT badging would make me feel more 'comfortable' than a 3.4 (used elsewhere) and 'R' badging (though it looks like we won't get that).

Still waiting for written confirmation from my OPC to land on my door mat (though there is always a chance Bella has hidden/ eaten it)...

My ideal spec now is probably:

- Fixed, carbon buckets
- Alcantara everything (and deviated stitching, of course wink )
- Mechanical LSD
- Some aero to set it apart from GTS
- Recalibrated suspension and steering, specific to GT4
- Lift as an option, if required (my drive has a bit of a slope on entry)
- 3.6 NA flat 6 with >100bhp/litre
- Weight <1,300kg (may be easier said than done)
- PDK-S as an option (one I'd take but Manual won't prevent me from buying)

Now, I think that is all pretty achievable...

APOLO1

5,256 posts

194 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
LaurasOtherHalf said:
Would a Cayman need rear wheel steer though? My understanding was it is used on the 911 to overcome its inherrant tendency to understeer at corner entry due to the rear engined weight balance? Something a Cayman isn't inclined to do.

Does the 918 have it?
the rws acutely aides low speed turn in, the engine mounts go a long way the help with the point above.....yes the 918 has it and more.....

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

196 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
APOLO1 said:
LaurasOtherHalf said:
Would a Cayman need rear wheel steer though? My understanding was it is used on the 911 to overcome its inherrant tendency to understeer at corner entry due to the rear engined weight balance? Something a Cayman isn't inclined to do.

Does the 918 have it?
the rws acutely aides low speed turn in, the engine mounts go a long way the help with the point above.....yes the 918 has it and more.....
Cheers, what i meant by above however is unless they see an engineering/homologation reason for giving the car rws, is there any point in adding its complexity? When i had the Cayman R, the last thing i thought it needed was more turn in, though like mrD above, i did think the engine was lacking in some respects.

All speculation regarding engine sizes and power however, i don't think any of us can answer.

I'll stick with what i posted yesterday, if porsche are making this to homologate a car for GT4 entries it will simply get whatever engine they see necessary to win

isaldiri

18,537 posts

168 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
LaurasOtherHalf said:
I'll stick with what i posted yesterday, if porsche are making this to homologate a car for GT4 entries it will simply get whatever engine they see necessary to win
Ah.. the older 3.6 mezger then maybe! wink

isaldiri

18,537 posts

168 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
mrdemon said:
No one will ever agree on what car to drive for fun

Every one finds a level they are happy with to have a week end fun car, no right or wrong.
Same with PDK vs Manual

I am a bit scared to even part with my R as it is perfect for me, but too tempted with a few more BHp and this GT4
Well said, it's a bit of a siren's song to keep on looking for the next 'perfect' car but you've got one (or more) you're perfectly happy with.. ends up being probably a senseless waste of money yet oh so tempting. (off to check the classifieds again...hehe )

APOLO1

5,256 posts

194 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
LaurasOtherHalf said:
Cheers, what i meant by above however is unless they see an engineering/homologation reason for giving the car rws, is there any point in adding its complexity? When i had the Cayman R, the last thing i thought it needed was more turn in, though like mrD above, i did think the engine was lacking in some respects.

All speculation regarding engine sizes and power however, i don't think any of us can answer.

I'll stick with what i posted yesterday, if porsche are making this to homologate a car for GT4 entries it will simply get whatever engine they see necessary to win
the body is not wide enough to accommodate the servos for the rws......

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

196 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
isaldiri said:
LaurasOtherHalf said:
I'll stick with what i posted yesterday, if porsche are making this to homologate a car for GT4 entries it will simply get whatever engine they see necessary to win
Ah.. the older 3.6 mezger then maybe! wink
I see your wink and raise you a hehe if only!

Again, i make a bold if, IF Porsche want to sell some GT4s to private teams it has to be based on what they've sold as a road car.

Remember, Porsche have already competed in GT4 with a 911-guess what engine that used..... (Small clue, it was homologated way back in 2007 and was 3.6 litres wink )

The problem for porsche is if you go down that route you simply buy an old cup car and fit the GT4 parts, no £ in that for them.

If they want a successful GT4 car they first need to build a road car, and they might just want to get in there quick before all the other manufactures.

If this GT4 road car is this, we may just be getting something very special indeed, rather than a marketing department special that people are expecting.

itsybitsy

5,201 posts

185 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
Epic is the word I have heard to describe the GT 4!

Scooty100

1,469 posts

116 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
APOLO1 said:
the body is not wide enough to accommodate the servos for the rws......
APLOL1 you're not coming across as a fan of the GT4.

an I ask your views vs say a GT3? Tks

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
mrdemon said:
No one will ever agree on what car to drive for fun

I am a bit scared to even part with my R as it is perfect for me, but too tempted with a few more BHp and this GT4
I have the same problem so if the GT4 is as good as promised, I'm keeping the R as well. simple. laugh

Dr S

4,997 posts

226 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
LaurasOtherHalf said:
I'll stick with what i posted yesterday, if porsche are making this to homologate a car for GT4 entries it will simply get whatever engine they see necessary to win
Teams wanted to use the GT4 in the VLN (with plenty of Caymen around) but the car Porsche are building does not fit into any of the classes...

Edited by Dr S on Thursday 30th October 15:27

TDT

4,931 posts

119 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
I have to be honest - even though i have no real interest in a track special:
(I want something I can drive all of the time and the huge fixed wing on a car this small, precludes it from daily duty for me)

I've been waiting for what seems like forever for my Cayman GTS and am starting to have creeping thoughts about transferring my order to one of these instead.
Yes that wait would be longer again, and although the car has been confirmed - the spec hasn't, but still the idea of owning a potential landmark car like this has me second guessing myself.

Edited by TDT on Thursday 30th October 15:55

APOLO1

5,256 posts

194 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
Scooty100 said:
APOLO1 said:
the body is not wide enough to accommodate the servos for the rws......
APLOL1 you're not coming across as a fan of the GT4.

an I ask your views vs say a GT3? Tks
changed my mind, I am in........

seawise

2,145 posts

206 months

Thursday 30th October 2014
quotequote all
spoke to my friendly salesman at the OPC - all he knows is that there will be a GT4 launched early next year, probably at Geneva together with the 991 GT3 RS. as far as spec is concerned, he has no idea, just speculation and his comment was ''I'm sure you'll hear in the press before me''.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED