The Dirty Porsche Thread - Winter 14/15 Edition

[mollytherocker]

Carl_Docklands said:

Miopyk said:

Thanks for posting, come on SUV/Panamera drivers, we know you are out there, hiding the shadows!

I doubt theres more than 1% on here?

[Carl_Docklands]

well, there is more than a flipping, ,single, solitary 1, thats for sure!

or are the cayenne owners just interested in coolant pipes?

[Dick Sternum]

Much dirtier after we got back and dumped the muddy bikes back on the roof.

DS

Edited by Dick Sternum on Monday 16th February 21:49

[Number 5]

mollytherocker said:

Carl_Docklands said:

Miopyk said:

Thanks for posting, come on SUV/Panamera drivers, we know you are out there, hiding the shadows!

I doubt theres more than 1% on here?

[Carl_Docklands]

The first Panamera, get in !

[Number 5]

Carl_Docklands said:

The first Panamera, get in !

It's because they are marmite

[IMIA]

Number 5 said:

mollytherocker said:

Carl_Docklands said:

Miopyk said:

Thanks for posting, come on SUV/Panamera drivers, we know you are out there, hiding the shadows!

I doubt theres more than 1% on here?

Wow a turbo s. Send it to 9e and the'll make that even more of a rocket ship

[SkinnyPete]

Number 5 said:

Gorgeous.

[mollytherocker]

SkinnyPete said:

Number 5 said:

Gorgeous.

The Panamera is many things, but gorgeous? Really?

[IMIA]

My Mrs loves them and face lift car a bit prettier but still a bit slab sided for my liking. However its deeply impressive. If it was a 5 seater I reckon my wife would have one.

The acceleration in this clip is just unbelievable for a two tonne car. Its actually defying physics doing 0-60 in 3.6s and 0-100 in 8.3s. Power to weight ration of 280 bhp per tonne should not be able to put those figures in so I'm guessing it has far more ponies than Porsche is letting on and at least well over 600bhp for sure. Thats as quick as a 997.1 turbo which is staggering and has 303bhp per tonne. Just blew me away what its capable of on track.

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/mercedes/s-class/8933...

[Number 5]

IMIA said:

My Mrs loves them and face lift car a bit prettier but still a bit slab sided for my liking. However its deeply impressive. If it was a 5 seater I reckon my wife would have one.

The acceleration in this clip is just unbelievable for a two tonne car. Its actually defying physics doing 0-60 in 3.6s and 0-100 in 8.3s. Power to weight ration of 280 bhp per tonne should not be able to put those figures in so I'm guessing it has far more ponies than Porsche is letting on and at least well over 600bhp for sure. Thats as quick as a 997.1 turbo which is staggering and has 303bhp per tonne. Just blew me away what its capable of on track.

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/mercedes/s-class/8933...

Thanks for the feedback everyone, like I said in an earlier post the Panamera is marmite. When the Panamera first launched I too personally thought it was ugly but as time went by it began to grow on me until it started to then make sense for me to have one. I had a 997.1 Turbo and it was a mind blowingly good car and the Panamera is in my opinion equally as quick but it has the extra practicality because of its size. This one is well specced and of course with it being a Turbo S it has a lot of the options built in as part of the package.


Here's a couple more pictures of it

Edited by Number 5 on Tuesday 17th February 06:53

[Jim909]

I always thought the Pan looked a bit odd, until i sat in 1 and had a chance to look around, totally love them now.

[MollyGT3]

Getting it dirty in Wales today

[SkinnyPete]

mollytherocker said:

The Panamera is many things, but gorgeous? Really?

Looks are subjective, but yes in the flesh I think it's a great looking car.