Cayman GT4 Is it quick enough?

Cayman GT4 Is it quick enough?

Author
Discussion

Steve Rance

5,446 posts

231 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
Generally speaking high Revving engines are very expensive to build as they rely on a very strong bottom end. The Metz was a huge chunk of the cost of the 996/7 GT ranges. No doubt completely over the top as far as VW are concerned. Difficult trade off.

mollytherocker

14,366 posts

209 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
Steve Rance said:
Generally speaking high Revving engines are very expensive to build as they rely on a very strong bottom end. The Metz was a huge chunk of the cost of the 996/7 GT ranges. No doubt completely over the top as far as VW are concerned. Difficult trade off.
That's an interesting angle that I had not realised.

Its cheaper to build a less peaky engine then? i.e; you don't need such a high quality of components?

Steve Rance

5,446 posts

231 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
The cam profile is key to everything. In simplistic terms The rev capacity of the Metz engine has a higher capacity for outright power but is effectively detuned. They just unlocked a little more performance with each new model.

lemmingjames

7,456 posts

204 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
See Honda S2000 or the CTR/DC5 then?

bigmowley

Original Poster:

1,890 posts

176 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
I think the fully optimum solution to this first world conundrum is clearly a bit of light tuning to liberate another 30 or 40 BHP along with a bit more top end enthusiasm. The base engine is clearly up to scratch so it's intake system for more breathing, possibly but not necessarily an exhaust and a thorough remap. It's a long time to wait for the Porsche warranty to expire!

mollytherocker

14,366 posts

209 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
lemmingjames said:
See Honda S2000 or the CTR/DC5 then?
The S2000 engine is nuts! I love it. Its almost F1 screamy!

Lovely chassis too....

bigmowley

Original Poster:

1,890 posts

176 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
mollytherocker said:
lemmingjames said:
See Honda S2000 or the CTR/DC5 then?
The S2000 engine is nuts! I love it. Its almost F1 screamy!

Lovely chassis too....
It's a dreadful chassis that lets go so sharply at the back that it's almost impossible to drive at the limit. Not my cup of tea.

mollytherocker

14,366 posts

209 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
bigmowley said:
It's a dreadful chassis that lets go so sharply at the back that it's almost impossible to drive at the limit. Not my cup of tea.
Its excessively oversteery, and thats a good thing!

bigmowley

Original Poster:

1,890 posts

176 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
mollytherocker said:
bigmowley said:
It's a dreadful chassis that lets go so sharply at the back that it's almost impossible to drive at the limit. Not my cup of tea.
Its excessively oversteery, and thats a good thing!
No it's not if you cannot hold it, balance it with the throttle and bring it back without any drama. I always managed to catch the S2000 but it usually involved much sawing away at the steering and a nasty mark in my pants.

apachesmith

499 posts

120 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Possibly a stupid question so forgive me for this!

What's stopping you from installing the power kit to the GT4?

mollytherocker

14,366 posts

209 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
bigmowley said:
No it's not if you cannot hold it, balance it with the throttle and bring it back without any drama. I always managed to catch the S2000 but it usually involved much sawing away at the steering and a nasty mark in my pants.
Er....sounds like fun to me! Do you not like driving!

PorscheGT4

21,146 posts

265 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
You can fit the power kit if you wish but it's £1000's and I do mean £1000's

The GT4 has the Cayman 74MM throttle body !!!!

The 991 3.8 has a 82MM throttle body, :-)

If one wants 415bhp you fit a 82mm throttle body to the GT4 some sports manifolds and get a remap, it's all quite simple.

If you want it to rev even more you can fit the x51 engine parts which open it up at the top end.

or you can go with a 4.0L kit for about £13k (guess at 435bhp) or the whole 4.0l big bore + X51 (guess at 450bhp) kit for about £20k

It's not magic beans !!!!

MrD out !

PS my Spyder wheels go straight onto my GT4 so drops the ratio's (in real money as over all they are smaller dia)and gives less grip 235/265 from 245/295, the GT4 is quick enough, the issue is the tyre footprint, long gearing and new chassis is too good for the 385BHp.
SO while the car is quick it's feels under powered for the set up. (an M3 v8 has circa 430BHp(don't quote me) and only 235/265 tyres with no weight over the rears)

So you have 2 routes, add power or take away grip. of course if you have PCCB's you cannot down size wheels so you are a bit screwed on options.

I'll not be posting again, just thought I would put some info on here as you guys go round and round in circles. :-)

RSVP911

8,192 posts

133 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Genuine question - I know there's lots of talk about the gearing being too long and that this is an issue - are you saying they did this on purpose and they could have just as easily made it shorter , but chose not to ? I guess another thought is this : did they choose to do this as they got a benefit elsewhere by doing it ? I suppose I just don't understand why they choose to build it like this ? smile

mollytherocker

14,366 posts

209 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
RSVP911 said:
Genuine question - I know there's lots of talk about the gearing being too long and that this is an issue - are you saying they did this on purpose and they could have just as easily made it shorter , but chose not to ? I guess another Thought is this : did they choose to do this as they got a benefit elsewhere by doing it ? I suppose I just don't understand why they choose to build it like this ? smile
I believe it all comes down to emissions testing and rating.

RSVP911

8,192 posts

133 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Ah ha , I see , thanks .

In the real world is it really a problem - I've only ever driven one briefly and it didn't bother me - but in truth , I haven't had enough time in one to really assess smile

mollytherocker

14,366 posts

209 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
RSVP911 said:
Ah ha , I see , thanks .

In the real world is it really a problem - I've only ever driven one briefly and it didn't bother me - but in truth , I haven't had enough time in one to really assess smile
For the average owner, its no problem at all. Apologies if that sounds patronising, its not meant to be.

Its only a frustration if you want to maximise the times you can ring its neck near to the red line.

RSVP911

8,192 posts

133 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
mollytherocker said:
For the average owner, its no problem at all. Apologies if that sounds patronising, its not meant to be.

Its only a frustration if you want to maximise the times you can ring its neck near to the red line.
Not a problem smile
Sounds like a dangerous thing to do in the real world , on real roads and as such maybe it's fine.

lemmingjames

7,456 posts

204 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
bigmowley said:
mollytherocker said:
bigmowley said:
It's a dreadful chassis that lets go so sharply at the back that it's almost impossible to drive at the limit. Not my cup of tea.
Its excessively oversteery, and thats a good thing!
No it's not if you cannot hold it, balance it with the throttle and bring it back without any drama. I always managed to catch the S2000 but it usually involved much sawing away at the steering and a nasty mark in my pants.
So S2000 more drivers car than GT4?!?

Though TBH, if the backend starts to see saw when im driving my 6-3, im normally leaving stains as well followed by a nervous laughter laugh

bigmowley

Original Poster:

1,890 posts

176 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
Forget the 911 "power kit" type options. Whatever we do has to be bespoke to the Cayman due to the compact nature of the install esp on the intake side. There should be no need to delve inside the engine, the cost benefit ratio goes out of the window at that point. A properly developed intake, with a big throttle body along with a retuned exhaust to match and a thorough remap will be just right. It's not the work of a moment as there will be much work avoid any holes in the torque curve, not easy on these engines, hence the very complex standard variable geometry intake system. But on the plus side the variable valve timing is nice and adjustable. The standard engine cover may need to be "adjusted" as it's mighty tight under there.
Once someone has done the development work it should all be bolt on and enjoy a 420BHP GT4.

Hellers

134 posts

173 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
bigmowley said:
Forget the 911 "power kit" type options. Whatever we do has to be bespoke to the Cayman due to the compact nature of the install esp on the intake side. There should be no need to delve inside the engine, the cost benefit ratio goes out of the window at that point. A properly developed intake, with a big throttle body along with a retuned exhaust to match and a thorough remap will be just right. It's not the work of a moment as there will be much work avoid any holes in the torque curve, not easy on these engines, hence the very complex standard variable geometry intake system. But on the plus side the variable valve timing is nice and adjustable. The standard engine cover may need to be "adjusted" as it's mighty tight under there.
Once someone has done the development work it should all be bolt on and enjoy a 420BHP GT4.
.... which might make it 'feel' faster for all of 10 minutes....