RS Dyno graph

Author
Discussion

jpf40

350 posts

232 months

Friday 26th May 2006
quotequote all
Mine ran 360 bhp before a remap at PARR.

The dyno figures are at the wheels.

After the remap it was just over 370 bhp.

Difficult to say what loss comes from transmission etc.

If you use 15%, then we're looking at 435 bhp at the flywheel.

Seems very optimistic. Never the less my car is quick.

It'll do 0-100 in 9.5 without trying . i.e not giving it a full bore start.

The GT3 engine is one great engine!

vixpy1

42,625 posts

265 months

Friday 26th May 2006
quotequote all
jpf40 said:
Mine ran 360 bhp before a remap at PARR.

The dyno figures are at the wheels.

After the remap it was just over 370 bhp.

Difficult to say what loss comes from transmission etc.

If you use 15%, then we're looking at 435 bhp at the flywheel.

Seems very optimistic. Never the less my car is quick.

It'll do 0-100 in 9.5 without trying . i.e not giving it a full bore start.

The GT3 engine is one great engine!


Thought Parr had a Hub dyno? So the figs would be at the hubs..

jpf40

350 posts

232 months

Friday 26th May 2006
quotequote all
vixpy1 said:
jpf40 said:
Mine ran 360 bhp before a remap at PARR.

The dyno figures are at the wheels.

After the remap it was just over 370 bhp.

Difficult to say what loss comes from transmission etc.

If you use 15%, then we're looking at 435 bhp at the flywheel.

Seems very optimistic. Never the less my car is quick.

It'll do 0-100 in 9.5 without trying . i.e not giving it a full bore start.

The GT3 engine is one great engine!


Thought Parr had a Hub dyno? So the figs would be at the hubs..


Yes, hubs my mistake.

weltmeister

448 posts

232 months

Friday 26th May 2006
quotequote all
Charlie [Vixpy] is correct. Parr do indeed have a Hub Dyno, so no comparison is possible. However most operators of hub dyno's report figures as "extrapolated flywheel"

Cheers

Allan McKee