Stability

Stability

Author
Discussion

topcat1

Original Poster:

342 posts

139 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Evening all,

After enjoying my first weekend with the Tuscan in absolutely ages, it's so much fun and still enjoy it, but aside from needing a few minor jobs doing it keeps reminding me how incredibly unstable it is at anything over 60~. It gets worse with speed, I had the chance to give it a right good blast up a straight (but slightly bumpy) road and I had to back off as I couldn't keep it in a straight line, twitchy doesn't start to describe it!

It's a 2000 non S, I don't think the lack of a splitter will be the cause of this problem, as it's not a particularly high speed problem, and it doesn't feel like lift, more like completely garbage geometry!!

I know I need to start by checking geo, but could the steering rack height be why it is so nervous (bump steer)? It would be nicer if the rack was slightly less sensitive, but I know I can't change that.

Any thoughts welcome!

Richie C

637 posts

206 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Based on knowledge gleaned from here and my own car, getting decent handling comes down to a combination of:

  • Geometry and ride height
  • Later wishbone design
  • Steering rack height
  • Front wheel spacers to increase track
  • Tyre choice and pressures

nrick

1,866 posts

163 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
I am beginning to think that the MK1 is just like that, you can improve it but the rack rate, geo angles and ofset of wheels is more difficult to alter.

Things I have learnt from my Mk1

Very selective on tyres, especially the front.
Spacers
Rack height
Geo setup (not all setups are the same)
Suspension
Tyre pressure
Wheel size (16's are better than 18's)
rack height (not changed on mine)
ride height
wishbone bushes


Any I have missed? The strange thing is that the MK2 vert has a completely different feel to it, much more relaxed and confident.

Sagi Badger

590 posts

193 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Posted similar before but my MK1 is a good as my Sag in my opinion. I have 19" wheels on Michelins with Gaz pros and poly bush black throughout. I run quite a lot of camber on the rear with neutral/zero toe on the front and a touch more camber than standard with caster at 5deg, I want to put more caster on so will make half spacers soon and try. The rack is spaced 3mm. It is very low. The front offset is a long way out, simply because the bling wheels that were on it didn't clear the calipers so it had spacers, it drove quite well so they stayed on... despite new bells and bespoke capliper brackets to move the calipers back.

Yep unbelievable but it drives well.

Tyre pressures make a big difference. Remember these cars are light so take some air out and try, as long as you don't flex the sidewall too much you will be OK. 19s Vs 16s can be softer as you have more on the road.

Keep us posted.

J

R7EBO

501 posts

142 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Sounds a lot like mine! Very scary on occasion, & oddly is worse since fitting shocks from an S - lots of bump steer which I never had before. Went out with my local club on Thursday night last week & had shoulder ache all the next day from clinging on down the B roads!

I've not had a geo setup done but tried different tyres & pressures with little difference. Also have the spacers fitted. If anyone has a genuinely really good geo set up, knows the figures & doesn't mind sharing then please do so! beer

nrick

1,866 posts

163 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Do we have a definitive list of changes Mk1 - Mk2 - Mk2 '06 ?

I know

Rack changed to lazier rack
Electric power steering
suspension to Eibach/Bilstein

Anything else?

The Sag has different wishbones, wider track, different pick up points.

blueg33

35,772 posts

224 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
My mark one was the same. I got fed up in the end, the Evora is wsy quicker from a to b despite slower acceleration.

Basil Brush

5,080 posts

263 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
I don't think the rack actually changed. The top wishbone shape was changed to allow the wheel to turn further, giving more lock. This meant more turns lock to lock but I think this gets confused with rack ratio being slowed.

Sag and later Tuscan wishbones are the same. The mounting points are higher and further out on the Sag chassis giving the added track.

alspeed

297 posts

206 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Does anyone have any issues when braking hard from speed ? have had a couple of major brown trouser moments doing this, car feels really unsettled and weaves from side to side. Big fight to keep it pointing

forward, feels like its about to swap ends at any second,

Not investigated yet but car has been well maintained (I have receipts for 20k + spent over last 5 years by previous owner on routine maintenance and servicing at a TVR specialist garage)

they seem to have picked up on even the most mundane stuff so would be surprised if they have missed worn bushes etc, pads and discs including rear calipers are all fairly new

In for MOT this week, so will check brake balance, am wondering if one of the new rear calipers is not bled up properly

Also suffers from bump steer and is hard to drive briskly on bumpy B roads.

Still loving it, just need to be very careful.....am planning a good fettle over winter including some handling mods.

Edited by alspeed on Monday 20th July 21:35

Basil Brush

5,080 posts

263 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
I used to have the same braking reaction on mine. The biggest benefit came from setting the rack height properly to get rid of the bump toe in my early Mk1 had with the standard set up. I also swapped wishbones and uprights to the later Tuscan spec which improved things again.

The brake balance was also too rear biased as standard but upping the front discs to 322 and leaving original size rears has helped.

alspeed

297 posts

206 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Basil Brush said:
I used to have the same braking reaction on mine. The biggest benefit came from setting the rack height properly to get rid of the bump toe in my early Mk1 had with the standard set up. I also swapped wishbones and uprights to the later Tuscan spec which improved things again.

The brake balance was also too rear biased as standard but upping the front discs to 322 and leaving original size rears has helped.
When you refer to "later Tuscan spec" is that MK2 ? my car is a 2003 Mk1 I understand the last Tuscans shared wishbones (so i guess uprights too) with the Sagaris

nrick

1,866 posts

163 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
Three different part numbers for

Mk1
Mk2 t350 tam
Sag

Can't find any rack ratio data though

Basil Brush

5,080 posts

263 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
nrick said:
Three different part numbers for

Mk1
Mk2 t350 tam
Sag

Can't find any rack ratio data though
What part are you referring to?

Basil Brush

5,080 posts

263 months

Monday 20th July 2015
quotequote all
alspeed said:
When you refer to "later Tuscan spec" is that MK2 ? my car is a 2003 Mk1 I understand the last Tuscans shared wishbones (so i guess uprights too) with the Sagaris
Late Mk1 and 2 are the same in terms of top wishbone length and uprights. That's what I have on the front of my early Mk1, along with electric PAS pump.

nrick

1,866 posts

163 months

Tuesday 21st July 2015
quotequote all
Basil Brush said:
What part are you referring to?
Steering racks

nrick

1,866 posts

163 months

Tuesday 21st July 2015
quotequote all
The rack lengths may just be different

phazed

21,844 posts

204 months

Tuesday 21st July 2015
quotequote all
Your problems sound awful, should have bought a chim wink

Seriously, my handling was that poor when I swapped to a new set of dampers by a well known manufacturer. Country lanes were downright dangerous with the car bumping, skipping and being thrown off line by the slightest irregularity in the road.

I changed back to my Gaz Monos and the problem was solved.

Sounds like your damping is way too hard or your units are shot/useless/ set up very badly.

topcat1

Original Poster:

342 posts

139 months

Tuesday 21st July 2015
quotequote all
I'm planning on getting the geo done shortly, then will look at the 3mm spacers. What should the tyre pressures be on 18" spiders? The owners manual just states 22psi for 16" wheels!

I'd love the rack to be less sensitive, similar to your Evora, I reckon I could get from A to B much faster in my Mrs' Audi TT, I can have the wheels struggling for grip right up to 4th whilst pushing it round a corner, if I tried anything like that in the Trev I probably wouldn't be here to tell the tale!

alspeed

297 posts

206 months

Tuesday 21st July 2015
quotequote all
Interesting previous thread on the subject........


http://www.pistonheads.com/Gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

davidsc

325 posts

152 months

Tuesday 21st July 2015
quotequote all
Mine was pretty scary when I first got it.

Since then I've done the following...

Re-gassed Nitrons
Changed all suspension bushes
Raised rack 10mm
3mm wheel spacers
Tyre dropped to 22psi
Geo set up

Now it drives like a 3 series :-)

  • edit* do the later Sag/Tuscan upper wishbone fit an early chassis and would this make a noticeable difference to the way the earlier car drives? I was advised to stick with the standard upper wishbons when I replaced the bushes - if it hadn't been for this then I would have bought the later, slightly longer top wishbones.